Madrid judge hears arguments for and against Super League
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 14/03/2024 (932 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
MADRID (AP) — A Madrid judge heard arguments for and against the Super League on Thursday, less than three months after the European Union’s top court said UEFA and FIFA acted unlawfully to block the rebel competition.
The Madrid court had asked the European Union to weigh in on whether the soccer governing bodies breached European law by allegedly abusing their market dominance. The European court said they did.
The Spanish judge heard new arguments by the parties promoting and opposing the competition, and it was expected to make a ruling in a few weeks.
Among those in the Madrid court on Thursday were lawyers for the Super League, UEFA and A22 Sports Management, the Madrid-based company trying to promote the competition.
There were no representatives of Real Madrid or Barcelona, the only clubs still left in the breakaway project that was launched in 2021 and quickly collapsed after protests by fans across Europe.
José Antonio del Valle, a partner at Cremades & Calvo-Sotelo law firm, said the difference between this court’s decision and the one made by the European court is that this ruling must directly address the Super League.
“It is not a minor question,” he told The Associated Press in a written response. “The Spanish judge will have to make her interpretation and issue a ruling about the concrete suit of the Super League.”
Del Valle added that the ruling will likely be appealed to a higher Spanish court by one side or the other.
Promoters of the new competition lost a recent legal battle when the EU Intellectual Property Office said it cannot be registered under the Super League trademark because it is “conceptually identical” to the Super Liga in Denmark.
___
AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer