Ex-judge found guilty of killing his wife

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 15/06/2012 (5154 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

QUEBEC — An emotional courthouse scene erupted as Jacques Delisle, believed to be the first Canadian judge to ever stand trial for murder, was found guilty Thursday of having shot his wife in the head with a pistol.

The first-degree murder verdict means the 77-year-old retired judge will automatically receive the sternest possible punishment in the Criminal Code: life in prison, with no possibility of parole for a quarter-century.

The voice of the presiding judge, Claude C. Gagnon, trembled as he explained the sentence. Delisle buried his face in his hands upon hearing the verdict. He slammed his fist into a table and said, “For God’s sake, no.”

There were pained screams from his family. Over in the public gallery, Delisle’s son inexplicably removed his jacket and began unbuckling his belt, before being ordered to calm down by courthouse constables. He pleaded for the chance to hug his father — and was denied.

With that, the once-prominent judge was escorted from the courtroom as a convict. It had taken an eight-man, four-woman jury just under three days to reach its decision.

The Crown prosecutor said the outcome proved “nobody is above the law, regardless of title, regardless of profession, regardless of someone’s place in society.”

But he did express sympathy for the son following the emotional scene: “The mother is dead, and then the father is in jail for the rest of his life,” said Crown lawyer Steve Magnan. “So I do understand the reaction that they had.”

It will now be up to Delisle’s lawyers to decide on an appeal. It’s also up to them to request special prison security, if they want it, for the former judge. They did not comment Thursday.

On Nov. 12, 2009, Delisle said he found his wife already dead when he walked into the condo they shared in Quebec City. She lay on a sofa, a .22-calibre pistol at her side and a bullet wound in her head. He called 911, telling the operator his wife had committed suicide.

Delisle’s wife, Marie-Nicole Rainville, was paralyzed on her right side by a stroke two years earlier and had just undergone therapy for a hip fracture that summer.

The accused wept while listening to testimony at his trial about his wife’s physical challenges, including the loss of the ability to speak foreign languages, play bridge and do puzzles because of her brain damage.

One Quebec legal observer said he expects an appeal because, at this point, Delisle has nothing left to lose.

He said the verdict was predictable, however, for two reasons: First, Delisle never testified in his own defence and juries in murder cases often react badly to that. Also, the forensic evidence was devastating, said criminal-law expert Robert LaHaye.

Police originally appeared to accept Delisle’s explanation for his wife’s demise and the death was officially listed as a suicide. But further investigation led to first-degree murder charges against the retired Quebec Court of Appeal justice.

The Crown argued during Delisle’s month-long trial that he killed his 71-year-old spouse because he wanted to avoid a costly divorce and wanted to move in with his former secretary, with whom he had been having an affair.

 

— The Canadian Press