Field of dreams (of growing cannabis)

Our enlightened advice columnist answers your questions about becoming a legal cannabis farmer, plus the thorny topic of whether marijuana is addictive

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Dear Herb: I have a medical cannabis licence to grow my own medicine presently. Will I have the opportunity to grow cannabis as a business once it's legal in Canada? — Future Farmer

Read this article for free:


By clicking the button above, an account will be created and you will begin to receive some of our recommended newsletters. You may opt out of any newsletter by visiting your Email and Communication Preferences page or by clicking "unsubscribe" at the bottom of any email.

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $1.44 a week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $5.77 plus GST every four weeks. After 52 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 27/12/2017 (3223 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Dear Herb: I have a medical cannabis licence to grow my own medicine presently. Will I have the opportunity to grow cannabis as a business once it’s legal in Canada? — Future Farmer

Dear Future Farmer: Your question gets to the heart of an important policy question about cannabis legalization: Should Canadians with prior experience growing cannabis be allowed to contribute to the legal supply of the plant?

Herb answers your questions about legal consumption and growing, the law, etiquette — you name it, he'll look into it.
Herb answers your questions about legal consumption and growing, the law, etiquette — you name it, he'll look into it.

At first, it looked like the federal government’s answer to that question was “no.” As you probably know, Ottawa’s existing rules for legal medical cannabis limits large-scale production to a group of authorized licensed producers, who adhere to a strict regulatory scheme called the ACMPR.

Those licensed producers will also be the source of cannabis sold for recreational purposes after legalization. (Individual medical cannabis users like yourself are also allowed to grow their own, as are some “designated growers” who grow on behalf of other medical users.)

Critics of the government’s legalization plan, though, have argued that restricting legal production of recreational cannabis to licensed producers would leave lots of people (like yourself) out in the cold. Preventing Canadians with existing cannabis production experience from taking part in the legal industry, those critics argue, is a recipe for continuing the black market.

Plus, it ignores the fact that people like you have valuable skills — why shouldn’t you be able to monetize your bud-growing talent and contribute to the economy?

Those arguments might have made a difference. In November, the federal government announced draft regulations that could allow people like you to grow cannabis for sale to the general public after legalization.

Those proposed regulations would allow “micro-cultivation” of cannabis on a much smaller scale than the big licensed producers, under slightly less onerous rules. Health Canada is still figuring out exactly how “micro” a micro-cultivation operation would have to be.

If you’re interested, I strongly recommend you read through the proposed regulations in full.

Remember, Future Farmer: These regulations aren’t written in stone, and Health Canada has asked Canadians to give feedback before the rules are finalized. You have until January 20 to share your thoughts as part of the consultation process.

If you end up become a micro-cultivator in the future, please let me know! I’d love to tour the farm. Good luck!

 

***

Dear Herb: I always have thought pot was pretty harmless and not addicting. Now I know many people that are (at least) mentally very addicted to it. My opinion is they are using it as a coping mechanism and have done so for years.

Is this something anyone else has noticed? Or am I just now experiencing the ‘pothead’ culture? — Social Smoker

Dear Social Smoker: Thanks for the question. The issue of cannabis addiction is confusing and controversial, but I’ll do my best, as always!

Your query itself hints at part of the answer: You mentioned that you know people who are “mentally” addicted to cannabis. These days, experts generally consider cannabis to have the potential for psychological addiction, but not physical addiction like heroin or cocaine. (That said, some heavy cannabis users have reported experiencing unpleasant physical withdrawal symptoms if they quit cold turkey.)

In other words, people can become psychologically dependent on the emotional and cognitive effects of cannabis — just like someone can become psychologically dependent on any other pleasurable substance or experience (food, pornography, smartphones, Star Trek reruns, collecting stamps, etc.)

It’s definitely possible that cannabis can be used as a “coping mechanism,” as you said, but so can all kinds of things.

If cannabis can cause psychological dependence, the question becomes: How likely is a cannabis user to actually become dependent on the drug? Here’s where things get a little sketchy.

The most frequently cited statistic on this topic is that “nine per cent of cannabis users become dependent.” (Sometimes this is rounded up to ten per cent; it’s also expressed as “one in 11 users.”)

As best I can tell, that figure traces back to a 1994 study by James C. Anthony, Lynn A. Warner, and Ronald C. Kessler published in the journal Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, called “Comparative Epidemiology of Dependence on Tobacco, Alcohol, Controlled Substances, and Inhalants: Basic Findings From the National Comorbidity Survey.”

The researchers relied on a sample of 8,098 participants in the U.S., each of whom was interviewed about their substance use between 1990 and 1992. To be termed “dependent” on a substance, the subjects had to meet at least three of nine criteria for dependence set out in the third edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which was published in 1980.

(Perhaps you’re starting to see the issues with relying on the “nine per cent” figure nowadays: It’s based on 25-year-old research, and uses a definition of “dependence” that’s almost four decades old.)

“Within the study population, an estimated 46.3% had used cannabis at least once, but only 9.1% of the users had developed cannabis dependence. For every user with a history of cannabis dependence, there were 10 users who had not become dependent,” wrote the authors.

“By comparison, an estimated 16.2% of the study population had tried cocaine at least once, and 16.7% of them had qualified as cocaine dependent.”

My point here isn’t that cannabis doesn’t cause dependence — clearly, it can. But we need much, much better research on the topic before we can make any trustworthy claims about the exact likelihood of that dependence.

In the meantime, maybe you can chat with your buddies about how they’re using cannabis. With legalization on the horizon, I’m finding people are becoming more honest about their marijuana use.

 

***

Got a question about cannabis? Herb answers your questions about legal consumption and growing, the law, etiquette — you name it, he’ll look into it.  Email dearherb@theleafnews.com or to submit anonymously, fill out this form:    

(dearHerbForm)

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Security under magnifying glass after suspicious death on Mountain Avenue

Morgan Modjeski 5 minute read Preview

Security under magnifying glass after suspicious death on Mountain Avenue

Morgan Modjeski 5 minute read 8:15 AM CDT

Homicide detectives are investigating the suspicious death of a 70-year-old man at a seniors high-rise on Mountain Avenue.

Forensic investigators and detectives have been at the building, at 595 Mountain Ave., and questioning residents about the death of Richard Boychuk, whose body was found in his second-storey suite Tuesday morning.

The 70-year-old, who used a wheelchair, had lived in the Winnipeg Housing Rehabilitation Corp. apartment for several years, said close friend Angela Abdilla.

She would clean, shop and take care of Boychuk, a former Elvis impersonator.

Read
8:15 AM CDT

What $4 pumpkin can teach us about workplace culture

Tory McNally 7 minute read Preview

What $4 pumpkin can teach us about workplace culture

Tory McNally 7 minute read 2:02 AM CDT

There are few things more revealing about a workplace than what happens when someone suggests a little fun.

Put a pumpkin on the reception desk, announce a Halloween costume day or suggest that everyone take 20 minutes to enjoy some candy and you may discover that your organization falls into one of two camps.

There are those who embrace the opportunity to do something different and those who immediately begin calculating the cost of lost productivity.

Somewhere, a manager is currently wondering whether the employee who spent 15 minutes decorating their office door could have used that time to answer three emails. Another is worried allowing costumes will somehow lead to a complete collapse of professional standards. A third is quietly trying to figure out whether a bowl of miniature chocolate bars can be claimed as a business expense.

Read
2:02 AM CDT

Puck set to drop on Heritage Classic festivities

Mike McIntyre 7 minute read Preview

Puck set to drop on Heritage Classic festivities

Mike McIntyre 7 minute read Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026

It’s the ultimate Manitoba mash-up: Cottage country meets hockey heaven.

And it will be the central theme for the 2026 Tim Hortons NHL Heritage Classic, which features the Winnipeg Jets and Montreal Canadiens facing off Sunday evening at Princess Auto Stadium.

“We’re really excited about this one. It pops. It looks amazing. We think this is one of our better-looking field designs,” Steve Mayer, the president of NHL content and events, told reporters this week as preparation of the outdoor rink and related components reached a fever pitch.

“We want people to walk in the stadium and go, ‘Wow.’”

Read
Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026

Reynolds exerts ‘maximum effort’ to boost Winnipeg after quick meet with mayor

Gabrielle Piché 3 minute read Preview

Reynolds exerts ‘maximum effort’ to boost Winnipeg after quick meet with mayor

Gabrielle Piché 3 minute read Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026

Ryan Reynolds wasn’t wearing his Deadpool suit, but that didn’t stop Mayor Scott Gillingham from wanting to talk about films with the Vancouver-born Hollywood movie star.

Reynolds, who appeared at IG Wealth Management's 100th anniversary celebration Wednesday at the RBC Convention Centre, took to social media afterward, sharing a photo of himself with Gillingham and trumpeting the province’s tax incentives.

“An incredible place to shoot,” the Instagram post read.

On Thursday, Gillingham said the actor, best known for portraying an irreverent, erratic anti-hero on the big screen, is a “really nice gentleman.”

Read
Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026

Opening of Portage and Main shows even seemingly insurmountable impasses can be overcome

Jason Syvixay 10 minute read Preview

Opening of Portage and Main shows even seemingly insurmountable impasses can be overcome

Jason Syvixay 10 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

There are places in a city that become more than places. Portage and Main is one of them. For generations of Winnipeggers, the intersection has represented downtown, traffic, development and civic identity. Its reopening to pedestrians in 2025, after 46 years of closure, was about more than crossing a street. It was a reminder that decisions made by one generation can shape the choices available to another — and that even seemingly permanent decisions can be reconsidered.

I have spent much of my professional life thinking about Winnipeg as a planner, working in public, private and non-profit settings. My PhD research gave me an opportunity to examine Portage and Main differently: not simply as a debate about cars and pedestrians, but as a window into how power operates in a city. I reviewed 569 archival documents spanning the 1960s to the present, interviewed 48 planners with experience in Winnipeg, and mapped the relationships between planners, politicians, developers, engineers, residents, businesses and advocacy groups.

What emerged was a story about how planning decisions become embedded in a city’s institutions, agreements, infrastructure, professional practices and political expectations — shaping not only what gets built, but who gets to influence what gets built.

The closure of Portage and Main in 1979 did not remain a decision confined to a particular political moment. Over time, it was reinforced by development agreements, physical infrastructure, property relationships, traffic-engineering practices, administrative routines, and public narratives about mobility and downtown revitalization. The people who made many of those original decisions eventually left office. The arrangements they created remained. Later planners inherited them.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Eadie faces crowded field — including former councillor — in bid for fifth term in Mynarski

Malak Abas 8 minute read Preview

Eadie faces crowded field — including former councillor — in bid for fifth term in Mynarski

Malak Abas 8 minute read Yesterday at 6:00 AM CDT

The city’s most crowded council race has a little bit of everything: a long-serving incumbent, a former ward councillor in the 1980s, an unsuccessful candidate in the last municipal election seeking a rematch and three political newcomers.

Mynarski has long been led by Coun. Ross Eadie, who was first elected in 2010 and is seeking his fifth term. Five challengers want the job: Natalie Smith, who ran in the ward in 2022 and came in second, Terry Wachniak, Harold Brazil, Laurie Kozak and Ayaz Noor Mohammed.

It’s the city ward with the largest number of candidates this year.

Eadie describes himself as “a dancer, a singer and a city councillor” who has made inroads on garbage pickup, back-lane cleaning and earning the respect of his fellow council members by being the first Mynarski councillor to be appointed to executive policy committee, the mayor’s inner circle, in decades.

Read
Yesterday at 6:00 AM CDT