‘You could say there’s a real problem in the pews’

Advertisement

Advertise with us

God as a three-in-one, Jesus as divine, the resurrection of Jesus from the dead — these are traditional church teachings that all Christians are assumed to believe. But a recent study by Cardus and the Canadian Bible Society has found that assumption to be unfounded.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/05/2024 (872 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

God as a three-in-one, Jesus as divine, the resurrection of Jesus from the dead — these are traditional church teachings that all Christians are assumed to believe. But a recent study by Cardus and the Canadian Bible Society has found that assumption to be unfounded.

Titled “Still Christian(?): What Canadian Christians Actually Believe,” the study’s author, Andrew Bennett, found the beliefs of many Canadian Christians don’t match up with what their churches teach on these and other doctrines.

For example, when asked to agree or disagree with the statement “there is one true God in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit,” 89 per cent evangelicals agreed, as did 51 per cent of Catholics and 57 per cent of mainline Protestants.

When asked if the resurrection of Jesus Christ was a historical event, 81 per cent of evangelicals said yes, as did 48 per cent of Catholics and 55 per cent of mainline Protestants.

As for whether Jesus was God, 74 per cent of evangelicals said yes, as did 46 per cent of Catholics and 42 per cent of mainline Protestants.

Are all religions equally true? The study found that 20 per cent of evangelicals agreed, as did 54 per cent of Catholics and 57 per cent of mainline Protestants.

When it comes to whether Christian moral teachings should evolve with changes in society, 45 per cent of evangelicals said yes, as did 72 per cent of Catholics and 61 per cent of mainline Protestants.

The study of 2,026 randomly selected Canadian adults was conducted by the Angus Reid Institute in February. Along with questions about doctrines, it also asks respondents for their views on things like abortion, same-sex marriage, heaven and hell and church attendance.

For Bennett, who is program director for Faith Communities at Cardus, the results are startling. “You could say there’s a real problem in the pews,” he said.

While evangelicals are more likely to hold to their denominational doctrines, there is “still some level of incoherence there,” he said, adding that especially for Catholics and mainline Protestants there are hints of “deep fractures” within those groups.

Although many diverged from traditional teachings, Bennett noted they still viewed themselves as Christians. “This fact is significant in itself,” he said.

One surprising finding from the study is that younger Canadian Christians display stronger commitments to traditional teachings compared to older generations. One reason for this, suggested Bennett, is that at a time when Christianity is no longer a cultural norm in Canada, some younger people “may be making deliberate, counter-cultural choices to adhere to the beliefs and devotional life of historical Christianity.”

For Sam Reimer, who teaches sociology at Crandall University in Moncton, the Cardus study mirrors his own research into the disparity between what Canadian evangelical clergy believe and what their denominations teach.

“Even active evangelicals will disagree knowingly with their church’s or denomination’s position on a moral or doctrinal belief,” said Reimer. He thinks this is because what used to be an accepted external locus of authority — church teaching — has been replaced by an internal locus where Christians think each person can decide what they want to believe “based on what works for them.”

Kevin Flatt studies religion at Redeemer University in Ancaster, Ont., For him, the results “are not surprising since they are consistent with longstanding patterns and trends in Christianity in Canada.”

What stands out for him is how evangelicals seem to have resisted an erosion of traditional doctrines, compared to Catholics and mainline Protestants — even if that group shows some significant differences of opinion.

“Overall, I would have expected to see secularization having more of an impact on evangelicals as well,” he said, suggesting evangelicals are more resistant to secularization than other groups.

For Andrew Rampton, rector at St. John the Evangelist, an Anglican church in Hamilton, the problem is that denominations like his haven’t done a good job of teaching their members the foundational Christian beliefs.

“We were so very drunk on Christendom for such a very long time,” said Rampton of the Anglican Church of Canada, noting that for a very long time the values of the surrounding culture supported Christian belief and practice — teaching about it wasn’t as necessary.

That led Anglicans to rely on something he called “liturgical osmosis,” or just assuming everyone would figure it out just by being in Canada.

But now that Canada is less Christian — “not a bad thing for the church in my estimation,” he offered — “we have to remember how to be a group who are not the dominant cultural mindset.”

Rampton also has seen evidence of how young people are more likely to hold traditional beliefs. “Most of the young people I know in the Anglican Church are there by choice,” he said, noting they were very deliberate about choosing that option

As for the study itself, one question it doesn’t ask is whether the beliefs it highlights are still the ones Christians most need to be faithful in the 21st century; is the problem really as big as the study’s author suggests?

Or maybe something is happening in Canadian churches today as people find new ways of expressing and practising faithfulness — ways that go beyond the need to believe certain things in order to be a Christian. For that, we might need a different study.

The full Cardus study can be found at https://www.cardus.ca/research/faith-communities/reports/still-christian/?utm_source=Still+Christian+NR&utm_medium=Cision&utm_campaign=Still+Christian(%3f)

faith@freepress.mb.ca

The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba through our Religion in the News project. This reporting continues because readers like you step forward to fund it.

Donate now to support our reporting on religion.

Your donation is eligible for a charitable tax receipt. BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER

John Longhurst

John Longhurst
Faith columnist & reporter

John Longhurst has been writing for Winnipeg's faith pages since 2003. He also writes for Religion News Service in the U.S., and blogs about the media, marketing and communications at Making the News.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

The Free Press acknowledges the financial support it receives from members of the city’s faith community, which makes our coverage of religion possible.

More Stories

Infill development on minds of all three River Heights-Fort Garry candidates

Joyanne Pursaga 4 minute read Preview

Infill development on minds of all three River Heights-Fort Garry candidates

Joyanne Pursaga 4 minute read Yesterday at 1:07 PM CDT

A trio of candidates will compete to become the first new city councillor in River Heights-Fort Garry since 2009.

Coun. John Orlikow, who won the seat in a byelection, is not running for another term.

Georgina Sabesky, who served as Orlikow’s executive assistant for 17 years, is now one of the candidates vying for the council seat.

Sabesky said that job gave her ample knowledge of the ward.

Read
Yesterday at 1:07 PM CDT

This week’s silly geopolitical spat

Gwynne Dyer 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

“I would not like to call this an incident. Let’s say it’s a diplomatic misunderstanding,” said Ukrainian Foreign Affairs Minister Andrii Sybiha. But the South Korean president definitely sees it as a serious incident, and he has already gone public with it.

“If (Ukraine’s) refusal to acknowledge the facts and issue a public apology continues, we will take additional measures,” President Lee Jae-myung wrote on X. He probably means cutting the non-military aid South Korea gives to Ukraine. (There is no military aid, since the constitution bans Seoul from providing arms to a country actively involved in a war).

What monstrous misdeed did the Ukrainian government commit to deserve such harsh words from a country that is generally sympathetic to Ukraine’s struggle against its giant neighbour? Have the South Koreans discovered Ukrainian spies in the Blue House?

No, it’s what we professionals call a “spat.”

Letters, Oct. 7

6 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

On diet and humanity

Re: “Maybe ASI will need us” (Letters, Oct. 5)

Mr. Martin, humans eating animals is not part of the circle of life. Many cultures with abundant plant resources, or for religious beliefs, have historically subsisted on largely or strictly vegetarian diets. Likewise, in extreme environments such as the Arctic, Inuit rely heavily on animal products due to the near-absence of arable land. Humans adapt locally to their environments and do not have a single ancestral diet.

Clearly vegetarian or vegan diets are not fringe, as evidenced by plant-based products on main-stream grocery store shelves. To suggest the Free Press is morally endorsing a fringe diet is rubbish, (the newspaper) merely gives the public a platform for diverse opinions, thus generating individual, thought-provoking ideas and conversations — a practice that is desperately needed these days.

Khan’s abrupt departure presents desperate Tories with a valuable opportunity

Tom Brodbeck 5 minute read Preview

Khan’s abrupt departure presents desperate Tories with a valuable opportunity

Tom Brodbeck 5 minute read Yesterday at 1:06 PM CDT

If the Manitoba Progressive Conservatives are serious about getting out of the political wilderness, they should start by electing a progressive conservative leader.

Read
Yesterday at 1:06 PM CDT

AI governance: Canada’s next structural test

Anne Thompson 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Artificial intelligence is accelerating faster than the governance structures meant to contain it. Canada now faces a structural test — whether our institutions can protect autonomy, dignity, and continuity in an era when decision-making is increasingly mediated by systems we did not design, cannot fully audit, and do not yet constitutionally constrain.

This is not a technological problem. It is a governance problem.

AI systems influence how information flows, how institutions behave, and how decisions are made. They shape the conditions under which harm becomes predictable. They amplify both the strengths and weaknesses of the systems into which they are deployed. And they do all of this at a scale and speed that outpaces traditional regulatory tools.

Canada’s current approach to AI governance relies heavily on policy, guidelines, and sector-specific regulation. These are important, but they are not sufficient. What is missing is structural clarity — a constitutional-grade framework that defines authority, responsibility, accountability, and the minimum conditions under which AI systems may operate without undermining human dignity or institutional credibility.

Puzzles Palace

1 minute read Monday, Jul. 27, 2026

To solve our puzzles, please subscribe with this special offer: |