Supreme Court to review mandatory minimum sentence in prostitution case
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.99/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/04/2025 (340 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to examine the constitutionality of a mandatory minimum sentence for purchasing sexual services from someone under age 18.
The decision comes in a case involving police publishing fictitious online escort service ads.
An undercover police officer told a man at least four times that a female escort was a minor.
The man was arrested after turning up to meet the supposed escort.
He was convicted and sentenced to six months behind bars — the mandatory minimum sentence under the Criminal Code provision.
The Quebec Court of Appeal dismissed the man’s appeal of his conviction and affirmed the sentence, but declared the mandatory minimum to be unconstitutional and of no force or effect.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 24, 2025.