Potter prequel not exactly spellbinding Second in wizarding series mostly a setup for followup films

One wants to refer to the new cycle of “Wizarding World” movies centred on magical zoologist Newt Scamander as a trilogy. But apparently, that is not a done deal. No one really seems to know how many Newt movies are coming down author J.K. Rowling’s Floo Network, although the number five has apparently been floated.

Read this article for free:


Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe with this special offer:

All-Access Digital Subscription

$1.50 for 150 days*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Pay $1.50 for the first 22 weeks of your subscription. After 22 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 per month. GST will be added to each payment. Subscription can be cancelled after the first 22 weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 15/11/2018 (1483 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.


One wants to refer to the new cycle of “Wizarding World” movies centred on magical zoologist Newt Scamander as a trilogy. But apparently, that is not a done deal. No one really seems to know how many Newt movies are coming down author J.K. Rowling’s Floo Network, although the number five has apparently been floated.

Even so, the second instalment, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald has a Two Towers vibe to it as it continues the story of the first movie but doesn’t tie the many narrative threads into a nice package by the end.

What the film does do is establish interesting sets of parallels in an increasingly complex plot. After an impressive prelude showing outlaw dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) escaping from the custody of the American Magical Congress, it emerges that our politically non-committal hero Newt (Eddie Redmayne) is staying in the Grindelwald business at the behest of his former Hogwarts teacher Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law). Dumbledore cannot personally move against the increasingly authoritarian Grindelwald — call him a wizard nationalist — and needs Newt as his proxy.

The second film in the Fantastic Beasts series is top-heavy with ideas and magical clutter. (Warner Bros. Pictures)

Harry Potter fans who have done a deep dive into the Great Lake of wizarding lore already know Dumbledore and Grindelwald started off as close friends. (Rowling has acknowledged they were, in fact, lovers.) And just as Dumbledore needs someone to fight his battle, so too does Grindelwald. That is one of the reasons he seeks out the still-alive Credence Barebone (Ezra Miller), an “obscurial” — essentially a closeted wizard whose magic bursts out in uncontrolled storms of destruction. (Man, there’s lots of sexual subtext in this new cycle of films.)

Another unexpected parallel: Dumbledore is living with the guilt of letting his sister die (which you can read about in the seventh Potter book Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows). That links him to Newt’s ex-girlfriend Leta Lestrange (Zoe Kravitz), likewise wrestling with her own past sins, something that might have driven her from Newt and into the arms of Newt’s older brother Theseus (Callum Turner), a dark wizard-fighting auror. “You never met a monster you couldn’t love,” Leta tells Newt in their sad reunion.

Both Newt and Grindelwald search for Credence in Paris, an exercise complicated by the appearance of American witch Queenie Goldstein (Alison Sudol) and her literally entranced Muggle boyfriend Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler). Through Queenie, Newt learns the reason why Queenie’s auror sister Tina (Katherine Waterston) has grown cold towards him. (Spoiler alert: It was a misleading cutline.)

Of course, Fantastic Beasts wouldn’t be Fantastic Beasts without … well, you know. The adventure in Paris also puts Newt on the hunt for a Zaowu, a creature from Chinese mythology, and also puts Newt in the proximity of Nagini, a cursed witch destined to permanently assume the form of a snake. (Nagini will figure prominently in the Potter series, of course.)

Rowling, who assumed screenwriting duties for this series, throws in a lot of moving parts. It falls on director David Yates to herd these Nifflers into a coherent narrative, something he does with practised ease. (Yates directed the last four of the eight Potter films and knows his way around the mythology.)

If Depp’s reveal at the end of the first film felt like a disappointing bit of stunt casting, he redeems himself somewhat here as the psychopathic villain, proving he can do charming, cold and soulless.

Redmayne too is more engaging this time around, toning down the eccentricity and social awkwardness to tolerable levels, thankfully.

It’s good fun, but also needlessly complex. The film is a little top-heavy with ideas and magical clutter and at least one baffling plot turn. In taming these Beasts into screenplays, one wishes the novelist Rowling had maintained the services of a good editor.

Twitter: @FreepKing

If you value coverage of Manitoba’s arts scene, help us do more.
Your contribution of $10, $25 or more will allow the Free Press to deepen our reporting on theatre, dance, music and galleries while also ensuring the broadest possible audience can access our arts journalism.
BECOME AN ARTS JOURNALISM SUPPORTER Click here to learn more about the project.

Randall King

Randall King

In a way, Randall King was born into the entertainment beat.

Movie Review

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

Starring Eddie Redmayne, Johnny Depp and Jude Law

Grant Park, Kildonan Place, McGillivray, Polo Park, St. Vital, Towne.


134 minutes

★★★ out of five

Other voices

The Crimes of Grindelwald is often dazzling, occasionally wondrous and always atmospheric. But is also a bit of a mess. Even magic bags can be overweight.

— Jake Coyle, The Associated Press

There might not be a more gorgeous-looking movie this year than Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald.

— Leah Greenblatt, Entertainment Weekly

The trick, which Crimes of Grindelwald doesn’t completely pull off, is to make us care about yet another dark wizard… Depp’s amazing performance as the dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald anchors the film.

— Julie Washington, Cleveland Plain Dealer

The world Rowling dreamt up during the Tony Blair era is getting no richer after this installment, but its creator and various producers certainly will be.

— Oliver Jones, Observer

After an hour I wanted to take a six-week sabbatical: to study more deeply the ensorcelling relationship between movie audiences and inflated movie drivel.

— Nigel Andrews, Financial Times

Report Error Submit a Tip