Pro or con spoilers, please mind the one-week rule

Advertisement

Advertise with us

The cruellest spoiler I have ever seen was not in a headline or in a tweet, but written in the dust on a dirty car parked on a busy Winnipeg street.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/04/2023 (1257 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

The cruellest spoiler I have ever seen was not in a headline or in a tweet, but written in the dust on a dirty car parked on a busy Winnipeg street.

Instead of the usual crude rendering of male genitalia or a directive to “wash me,” someone used their index finger to print out a three-word spoiler for The Rise of Skywalker, which had just come out, on the vehicle’s back window.

Now, I had already seen the movie so I can say this is also the funniest spoiler I have ever seen. The brevity and creativity were, honestly, very impressive. With a simple formula — MAIN CHARACTER + KEY VERB — this person revealed a major plot point. (Apparently something similar happened, though on a much bigger scale, spoiling the sixth Harry Potter book; the formula was the same but, in that case, it was a full banner suspended over a U.K. highway.)

A still from HBO show “Succession”. (HBO via The Associated Press files)

A still from HBO show “Succession”. (HBO via The Associated Press files)

But I know, too, that it was only funny because, for me, it wasn’t a spoiler.

Last week, it was as though MAIN CHARACTER + KEY VERB (and it’s always the same key verb) was written all over the internet about the patriarch of the Roy family at the heart of the HBO drama Succession, reigniting a conversation about spoiler etiquette.

Obviously, spoilers are mostly unavoidable if you’re on social media, what with the rise of live-tweeting TV episodes as though they are one-night-only entertainment events and the fact that, very often, people are still scrolling on their small screens while watching something on their big screens.

But with this particular episode of Succession, the Take Machine was working overtime. It was like people couldn’t wait to ruin it for everyone else.

The traditional advice in these cases is to stay offline until you’ve caught up, which, OK, sure, you can try. But headlines in traditional media have become just as bad. If you hadn’t watched Succession when it aired on Sunday night, it was very possible to have it ruined for you by your newspaper, as was the case for Irish viewers who learned what happened in Succession via an Irish Times headline.

Or, an article could have a “major spoilers ahead” alert, as a New York Times piece made sure to include, only to have the spoiler in the sentence immediately following it.

All of these examples are symptoms of an attention economy hungry for your eyeballs. People want to be “part of the conversation,” and they want to be part of it as it’s happening. And so, we get the proliferation of hot takes and recaps from everyone from casual fans to the podcasters, newsletter writers and legacy media entertainment columnists whose entire jobs are to recap the thing we all (supposedly) just watched. Consume the content to create more content, same as it ever was.

But because everything moves faster, the half-life of content is getting shorter, and more players are jockeying for your attention, there’s even more of a premium placed on being first, so spoiler-riddled content is getting pushed through feeds quicker. Which is how you end up with unwanted spoilers from unexpected sources.

Some people are impervious to spoilers; other people get so upset about them they send people death threats (which, relax, it’s a TV show). It’s understandable why spoilers rob enjoyment from a first-time viewing. They can blunt the emotional impact of a big reveal or a didn’t-see-it-coming plot twist. They turn the act of watching a television show you enjoy into yet another to-do list item to “get done” or “catch up on” before it “gets ruined” or you “fall behind.”

But, as with many things, time heals. A spoiler years later is different from a spoiler on opening weekend or minutes after a bombshell episode airs. And eventually, spoilers themselves become recognizable pop culture references in their own right. Like the identity of Luke Skywalker’s father, for one. Or the identity of Rosebud in Citizen Kane. Or the identity of Keyser Soze in The Usual Suspects. Or who shot J.R.. Or who shot Mr. Burns. This knowledge doesn’t make the source material any less enjoyable because storytelling is more than just plot points.

Still, if you know who KEY VERB in a movie or television episode, maybe wait on broadcasting that, whether via Twitter or on a parked car, for at least one (1) week.

jen.zoratti@winnipegfreepress.com

Jen Zoratti

Jen Zoratti
Columnist

Jen Zoratti is a columnist and feature writer working in the Arts & Life department, as well as the author of the weekly newsletter NEXT. A National Newspaper Award finalist for arts and entertainment writing, Jen is a graduate of the Creative Communications program at RRC Polytech and was a music writer before joining the Free Press in 2013. Read more about Jen.

Every piece of reporting Jen produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

 

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

How confusing; seems there’s more than one candidate in Hanover named Shayne Barkman

Dan Lett 5 minute read Preview

How confusing; seems there’s more than one candidate in Hanover named Shayne Barkman

Dan Lett 5 minute read Thursday, Sep. 24, 2026

It’s not entirely clear when or why Hanover trustee Shayne Barkman became one of Manitoba’s best-known anti-LGBTTQ+ crusaders.

Back in 2022, when he ran as a candidate for Hanover school board for the first time, there was nary a hint that socially conservative culture wars were going to be a large part of his identity as an elected official.

In a Steinbach Online profile published before the 2022 municipal elections, Barkman highlighted his background as a successful farmer. He said he was entering politics to be a “listening ear” who could promote understanding.

“I would love to kind of just be a voice of reason amongst all the problems coming down the pipe,” Barkman said

Read
Thursday, Sep. 24, 2026

Letters, Sept 26

7 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Important lessons lost

Re: Parents still in charge amid health curriculum overhaul: premier, Sept. 23

The premier’s assurance that parents could continue to “opt-out” their children from health education classes on the premise that specific topics clash with their “personal beliefs” is, at once, disappointing and concerning.

To be blunt, such an approach is Trumpian. It condones “othering.”

Public versus private schooling

John R. Wiens 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

A Recent Maggie Macintosh piece (Enrolment up at alternative schools, Sept. 7) and several letters to the editor touted the benefits and values of private schooling. The executive director of the Manitoba Federation of Independent Schools, Andrew Micklefield, emphasized schools of choice and governmental cost-saving. A private, formerly public, schoolteacher emphasized finances, academics and parental support.

None are wrong in their arguments, but they are missing the main reasons for the existence of public schools, which has less to do with money and academics than with inclusion and equality. Nor do they adequately acknowledge the downsides of exclusion and elitism fostered by some aspects of choice and inequality. The increase in numbers of private schools and their attendees is a cause for some public concern.

Micklefield’s assertion is that private schools save the government money. Letter-writer Paulo Borges intimates he saves the province $52,500 ($15,000 each for three home-schooled children and $7500 for one private-school tuition), further suggesting that the savings are not used wisely by governments in supporting public schools.

In the front-page article, Micklefield and others go further to suggest that the main reason parents choose private schools is to receive an education in a Christian setting. That is a very limited rationale and certainly does not include the much larger variety of reasons why people choose private schooling or an even more restricted version of schools of choice, home schooling.

Sequestered skivvies seem like last straw

Maureen Scurfield 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My husband, who earns a hefty income, stayed in the city most of the summer working, except for a few long weekends with the kids and me at the cottage. He has giant work projects that need daily tending.

I work hard, too, with our four kids, two dogs and a cat. But I have to tell you I got a shock last week after coming home to organize my family team for a thorough cleaning of our three-storey home.

You’ll never guess what they found up in the attic — hidden boxes of sexy women’s lingerie that all looks brand-new.

I’ve kept my mouth shut so far, but my mind is spinning.

U of W marks 10 years of Indigenous education requirement

Maggie Macintosh 5 minute read Preview

U of W marks 10 years of Indigenous education requirement

Maggie Macintosh 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

The University of Winnipeg is collecting course outlines, historic concerns about systemic racism on campus and related records to mark the 10-year anniversary of mandating Indigenous studies.

The unveiling of a new archive drew nearly 200 people to Centennial Hall on Thursday afternoon to reflect on how the Indigenous course requirement, also known as “the ICR,” came to be.

University archivist Brett Lougheed told the crowd its inception is “an amazing story” of student activism that, until now, wasn’t accurately reflected in U of W records.

“What little material we had told the story of administration’s role in developing the ICR as though it was the ultimate driver… and not a student-led response to racism,” Lougheed said.

Read
Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

Happy email debt forgiveness day

Tory McNally 8 minute read Preview

Happy email debt forgiveness day

Tory McNally 8 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

There are few things more capable of producing an immediate feeling of guilt than opening your inbox and seeing an email you have not answered.

You know the one. It has been sitting there for three days or three months or perhaps long enough that responding now feels less like answering an email and more like reopening a historical case. You read it, think, “I really need to deal with that,” and then close it again.

The next week you see it, feel slightly worse and tell yourself you will answer it when you have more time. A month later, you are considering whether it would be less embarrassing to change your name and move to another province.

Fortunately, there is a solution: Sept. 30 is Email Debt Forgiveness Day, and I think it may be one of the most compassionate holidays we have invented.

Read
2:01 AM CDT