Both you and your pooch barking up the wrong tree

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My small male dog has a major crush on the larger female dog next door. Here’s where it gets awkward: I also have a little crush on the female dog’s owner.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 02/08/2023 (1145 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My small male dog has a major crush on the larger female dog next door. Here’s where it gets awkward: I also have a little crush on the female dog’s owner.

My pooch gets out on the porch and yearns for her dog — whining and whimpering and jumping around like crazy when she’s out in her yard.

When they go to doggie daycare on the same day, he’s on this female’s case from the minute he gets there, according to the staff. She’s fixed and so is he, but this is bigger than hormones; he really loves that dog!

I suggested to my neighbour that we make a play date for our dogs. She looked me straight in the eye and told me she already had “a full-time job and a steady boyfriend.” So now what? I’m not the type to give up. What should I try next?

— Needing a New Move, Fort Rouge

Dear Needing: You and your hot-to-trot little dog, have a lot in common. You finally know the score, and you’ve been told rather coldly there will be no get-togethers. Yet, you still won’t give up. Both you and your canine need to get away from the home base and broaden your fields of interest.

It’s time you researched the possibilities for dog park socializing, other canine daycares and dog-and-owner training classes. They should be well away from your neighbour lady’s haunts with her canine.

“Don’t waste your time where you’re not wanted” is the lesson both you and your pup need to learn, so you can find amenable companions and happiness.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: I regularly get little drop-in visits to my farm from my two old boyfriends, which is just great, as we’re old friends. This bothers my new husband as he’s only had one wife before me. He was true to her from age 18 until the day she died.

I know he finds it a bit upsetting that I still have old boyfriends as pals who “knew me” in the religious sense of the word, way before he did. He doesn’t say much about that, because he was darn happy to “know me” after his wife died, after he had thought he may never experience physical love again. He was too shy and religious to even chase a woman.

Luckily, I finally came along and chased him. So now he has me, and I spoil him, and he’s never had it so good. But he’s also stuck with my favourite old boyfriends dropping in here and there, and they always come bearing gifts. That drives him crazy. Yesterday he said, “Don’t you see what they want in return? They’re bringing gifts, woman!”

Last night it came to a head when an old beau dropped in, and brought a rose bush. When he finally left my husband said, “I can’t stand your old boyfriends coming over, and looking at you like they’re hungry.”

I asked, “What do you want me to do?” and he said, “Break up with them!” I said I did that years ago, and he replied, “But they haven’t broken up with you.”

I realize there was some truth in that, but do I owe it to my husband to cut them off, just like that?

— Lady With Old Friends, southern Manitoba

Dear Lady: Turn this around. How would you feel if your current husband had two women who still came over to see him, and always arrived bearing gifts for him? Wouldn’t you want to chase them off?

You have to know that the old boyfriends are not giving off friendly vibes toward your guy. How much of the conversation is actually directed at him?

If you want to have coffee with these guys and a catch-up talk, don’t bring them to the home you share with your husband.

And, if you’re going to have a phone chat, do it when you’re alone. That’s showing love and respect for the current man who loves you deeply, and lives with you.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Desperate Poilievre wants Canadians to believe the sky is falling when it’s just cloudy outside

Tom Brodbeck 5 minute read Preview

Desperate Poilievre wants Canadians to believe the sky is falling when it’s just cloudy outside

Tom Brodbeck 5 minute read Friday, Sep. 18, 2026

Pierre Poilievre has a problem.

Canadians just don’t seem to be paying much attention to him anymore.

So, naturally, the Conservative Opposition leader has decided to turn up the volume.

At a recent party caucus retreat in Penticton, B.C., Poilievre delivered the familiar message: Canada is in trouble, Canadians are hurting and the Liberal government is making everything worse.

Read
Friday, Sep. 18, 2026

Not falling back means time loop remains unclosed

Jen Zoratti 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

I demand restitution. Where’s my hour?

In the traditional fall-back, spring-forward time change set up — you know, ol’ trusty that’s been effect for lo these 63 years — we lost an hour in the spring that we got back in the fall.

That was the social contract: you commit to feeling like you’re on cold medication for a week in March because you know a glorious extra hour of sleep will be returned to you in November. (Unless, of course, you have little kids, but look: we all make our choices.)

Well, that transaction, flawed as it was, isn’t happening this year. That hour you sacrificed to the sun gods in the spring? Gone. Not coming back. We’ve sprung forward and we shan’t be falling back — not in November, and (possibly) not ever. The scale shall remain unbalanced and the loop shall remain unclosed as Manitoba has adopted permanent daylight time.

Winnipeg Jets at Edmonton Oilers

0 minute read Yesterday at 3:22 PM CDT

Canada must not accept another Iranian autocracy

David Matas 5 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Iran is a state run by a radical government victimizing its citizens and its neighbours. How do we change that? Any regime change that repeats the mistakes of the past is not a solution.

What went wrong in the past which led to the current regime? One answer is the U.K. and American aided coup which led to the ouster in 1953 of a democratically elected government headed at the time by Mohammad Mossadegh and its replacement with an American friendly autocrat, the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

The Shah imposed his rule through the Iranian National Intelligence and Security Organization — SAVAK, the acronym of its Persian name. SAVAK systematically inflicted torture, arbitrary killings and extra-judicial killings on perceived opponents of the regime. It was only a matter of time before repression of a regime directed to serving foreign interests would be overthrown.

What replaced the regime of the Shah, in 1979, the current regime of the mullahs, is a regime as intolerant and violent as the regime of the Shah and then some. That was not inevitable. But neither was it surprising. The vicious nature of the current regime, following the example set by the Shah, and its hatred for the United States, reacting to the U.S. aided imposition of the Shah, both echoes and reacts to the past. In 1979, the U.S. reaped what it sowed in 1953.

‘She was looking to destroy me’: convicted harasser faces new charges

Dean Pritchard 5 minute read Preview

‘She was looking to destroy me’: convicted harasser faces new charges

Dean Pritchard 5 minute read Thursday, Sep. 17, 2026

When Agnieszka Ciochon-Newton moved into the 55-plus apartment building on Stradbrook Avenue last year, she came across as “timid, soft-spoken and sensitive,” said building manager Tanya Owen.

Little did Owen know the meek-looking 58-year-old woman would soon turn her life and the lives of many of her tenants upside down and threaten her career and family.

“She was looking to destroy me for a simple tenant disagreement,” Owen said Thursday.

Court records show Ciochon-Newton was arrested earlier this month and charged with seven counts of criminal harassment, two counts of uttering threats and one count each of fraud, breaking and entering, attempting to obstruct justice, intimidation of a justice official, mischief and defamatory libel.

Read
Thursday, Sep. 17, 2026

Former Bombers linebacker Gauthier enjoying career as electrician

Taylor Allen 6 minute read Preview

Former Bombers linebacker Gauthier enjoying career as electrician

Taylor Allen 6 minute read Friday, Sep. 18, 2026

Most professional football players don’t ride off into the sunset on their own terms.

Shayne Gauthier was well aware of that, but it didn’t make it sting any less when the Winnipeg Blue Bombers informed the veteran linebacker that they weren’t bringing him back for 2026.

“I was really hoping to play one more (season) because it would have been my 10th season, so, I’d say it didn’t really end the way I wanted,” Gauthier recently told the Free Press.

“It left a little sour taste in my mouth, but that’s part of pro sports. If everybody got the ending that they wanted, then it wouldn’t really work.”

Read
Friday, Sep. 18, 2026