Time to limit pool privileges to all-weather pals

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I’m a single-again guy who got the house with the pool in my divorce. It has been a big attraction for fair-weather friends the last couple of years. They’re eager to come over in June before the peak summer holiday weeks, and then go missing in early July. They start calling me again in late August, when they miss partying by the water… and my pool will do.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 19/08/2023 (1127 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I’m a single-again guy who got the house with the pool in my divorce. It has been a big attraction for fair-weather friends the last couple of years. They’re eager to come over in June before the peak summer holiday weeks, and then go missing in early July. They start calling me again in late August, when they miss partying by the water… and my pool will do.

I’m just guessing they don’t invite me to anything at their cottages or lake rentals because I have my own puddle, er, pool?

I’d like to know how to handle “buddies” who are starting to call up again, obviously looking for invitations. I thought of telling them my pool is “under repair” though that’d be a lie.

— Unwilling Host, Winnipeg

Dear Unwilling: Explain to these users you’ll only be having people over to repay them for having you to their pools or cabins, and there’s not much time left! That’ll introduce them to the idea of give-and-take. When they start stuttering, just say, “Thanks for calling, though. Give me a call in a few weeks when you want to go out and do something.” Say it in a pleasant voice, to confuse them. You’re not being totally antagonistic, you’re just telling them what’d work better for you.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: I’m a middle-aged woman and have had very good relationships with co-workers for the last 20 years. I’m always the one that people come to when they’re having personal or work problems, especially one good friend I consider like a brother.

Yesterday he asked me to meet him for drinks, to catch up. Everything was normal until he was leaving, and he said, “Don’t tell anybody we met for drinks.” Then he added to make especially sure not to tell the woman who works under him. I was taken aback, but agreed. He came to my desk today, and joked around like normal.

Another co-worker asked me to stop by her cabin on the long weekend, but then said, “But only if my husband isn’t there! Text when you want to come, and I’ll let you know if it’s OK.”

Finally — and this really did it — my caretaker who tells me daily about her problems and says I’m like a sister to her, just said to me, “Let’s go for dinner, but we’ll have to meet outside the neighbourhood. I don’t want any of the other tenants to know how close we are.”

I feel like everyone’s dirty little secret! My friendships have privacy conditions. Is this my life, to only have conditional friendships?

— Hurt and Embarrassed, Silver Heights

Dear Hurt: Don’t take offence too quickly, as these are not really insults. You’re a special intimate kind of friend who can converse on a deep level with people. They will cross usual “lines” because they really want to be closer with you.

It’s time to expand your friendships, to include other people who don’t need you as a free counsellor.

As for your girlfriend with the cabin, that’s a different situation. Cabins are known for not having thick walls. She wants to have intimate girlfriend talks and laughs with you, but not if her nosy husband is listening in, as she’ll likely be discussing him at times. How can planning for that situation be an insult to you?

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Hellebuyck standoff caused by… Nathan MacKinnon?

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Preview

Hellebuyck standoff caused by… Nathan MacKinnon?

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Yesterday at 6:34 PM CDT

Looking for someone to blame in the Connor Hellebuyck fiasco and cast as public enemy No. 1? How about long-time Winnipeg Jets nemesis Nathan MacKinnon?

Allow us to explain as we fire up the time machine and head back to February in Italy.

Oh, what could have been if MacKinnon had been able to score on what appeared to be an open net late in the third period of the men’s gold medal game with Hellebuyck down and seemingly out of position.

Instead, the star forward fired wide, keeping the score deadlocked at 1-1 as the clock ticked down on regulation.

Read
Yesterday at 6:34 PM CDT

Puzzles Palace

1 minute read Monday, Jul. 27, 2026

To solve our puzzles, please subscribe with this special offer: |

Today’s horoscope

Georgia Nicols 4 minute read Preview

Today’s horoscope

Georgia Nicols 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

MOON ALERT: After 12:15 a.m., there are no restrictions to shopping or important decisions today. The moon is in Capricorn.

ARIES (March 21-April 19)

This is a tricky day. Don’t be too ambitious. It’s totally OK to kick back and relax. But be aware that communications with parents and authority figures might be confused, vague or subject to misunderstandings. Nevertheless, romance is sweet and cosy!

TAURUS (April 20-May 20)

Read
2:01 AM CDT

Steinbach Credit Union member warns others after scammer steals $10K

Scott Billeck 5 minute read Preview

Steinbach Credit Union member warns others after scammer steals $10K

Scott Billeck 5 minute read Yesterday at 5:19 PM CDT

A Winnipeg single mother whose bank account was drained of nearly $10,000 says Steinbach Credit Union needs to warn its members about what she believes is a broader security problem.

The woman, who is not being named to protect her identity, said a scammer gained access to her account earlier this week after calling SCU’s contact centre, claiming to be her and successfully completing the credit union’s authentication process.

She said she knows of at least six others who have experienced similar incidents in which callers impersonate SCU account holders and pass the authentication checks.

The woman discovered something was wrong when her minor son asked why money had been transferred out of an account they jointly hold.

Read
Yesterday at 5:19 PM CDT

Canada must not accept another Iranian autocracy

David Matas 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Iran is a state run by a radical government victimizing its citizens and its neighbours. How do we change that? Any regime change that repeats the mistakes of the past is not a solution.

What went wrong in the past which led to the current regime? One answer is the U.K. and American aided coup which led to the ouster in 1953 of a democratically elected government headed at the time by Mohammad Mossadegh and its replacement with an American friendly autocrat, the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

The Shah imposed his rule through the Iranian National Intelligence and Security Organization — SAVAK, the acronym of its Persian name. SAVAK systematically inflicted torture, arbitrary killings and extra-judicial killings on perceived opponents of the regime. It was only a matter of time before repression of a regime directed to serving foreign interests would be overthrown.

What replaced the regime of the Shah, in 1979, the current regime of the mullahs, is a regime as intolerant and violent as the regime of the Shah and then some. That was not inevitable. But neither was it surprising. The vicious nature of the current regime, following the example set by the Shah, and its hatred for the United States, reacting to the U.S. aided imposition of the Shah, both echoes and reacts to the past. In 1979, the U.S. reaped what it sowed in 1953.

Gillingham in lead with decided voters

Nicole Buffie 6 minute read Preview

Gillingham in lead with decided voters

Nicole Buffie 6 minute read Yesterday at 6:55 PM CDT

A cloud of uncertainty is hanging over Winnipeg as October’s municipal election nears.

Three months after a poll showed more than 40 per cent of Winnipeggers wanted to see someone other than current mayor Scott Gillingham elected, a new Abacus Data poll indicates more than half of Winnipeg voters are undecided heading into next month’s civic election.

Of decided voters, 55 per cent favour Gillingham compared to 23 per cent for former councillor and provincial cabinet minister Kevin Klein and 11 per cent for funeral director Mike Vogiatzakis.

Of all respondents, just over 50 per cent said they were unsure while 13 per cent said they will not vote.

Read
Yesterday at 6:55 PM CDT