Thrills and chills eerily absent
Reboot/sequel diminishes the threat of previous films
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 06/02/2017 (3471 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
The movie Rings represents the third time in a month when major studios put out a major release onto theatre screens while largely ignoring the nicety of pre-screening the film for critics. The other two films were Resident Evil: The Final Chapter and Underworld: Blood Wars.
Since Rings doesn’t have a colon in the title, we must assume the reason for the screening omission is that studios tend to handle genre movies… gingerly.
In fairness, there’s sound reasoning behind the strategy. Generally, mainstream critics don’t have a lot of respect for the horror genre. So studios are generally content to release the movies and let the fans decide for themselves if it’s worthy.
Our vote on Rings: not worthy. This reboot/decade-later sequel follows a convoluted horror franchise that began in Japan (Ringu, 1998) and was remade for North American audiences (The Ring, 2002). The big problem with Rings is that it diminishes the threat of the original films, even as it tries to replicate their chills.
The designated damsel in distress is Julia (Matilda Lutz), a young woman compelled to intervene when her boyfriend Holt (Alex Roe) goes missing while attending college.
The opening scene of the film establishes some background. We see the demonic, video-spawned young girl Samara’s sphere of influence includes people on passenger planes. Airport security means nothing to this double-jointed hellspawn.
A victim’s VHS video — remember, the enclosed art film promises death within seven days to anyone who watches it — lands in the hands of bargain-hunting college biology professor Gabriel (Johnny Galecki).
Yep, Holt happens to be one of Gabriel’s students. Panicked by Holt’s refusal to take her calls, Julia heads to the school and finds herself enmeshed in something like an extracurricular death cult that has sprung up around the video.
Gabriel, still alive weeks after seeing the cassette, has determined the curse is lifted when the victim passes the curse on to someone else. (This is not news for anyone who has seen the original.) Gabriel tries to scientifically suss out the deeper meaning of the menace while glibly putting his own students at risk.
When Julia herself sees the video, the race is on to uncover more information about Samara’s origins as yet unexplored in previous Ring movies.
The investigation takes Julia and Holt to a rainy Washington state village where they elicit the help of Burke (Vincent D’Onofrio), a genial blind man with his own dark insights into Samara’s past.
Director F. Javier Gutiérrez has cobbled together a decent-looking film that makes the most of its doom-laden Pacific Northwest atmosphere. But like the other recent reboot/sequel Blair Witch, while it faithfully replicates the scare tactics of its inspiration, it doesn’t bring anything fresh to the game save a technological upgrade, in this case from VHS to digital.
Especially baffling is Gutiérrez’s choice to pretty much ignore the “clock,” that is: the seven-day countdown meant to layer time-is-running-out anxiety onto the premise.
Possibly, the director realized the clock doesn’t matter because the main characters are two good-looking Stepford millennials with no histories or discernible personalities of their own. Their sheer blankness is almost scary, which is as scary as this movie gets.
randall.king@freepress.mb.ca
Twitter: @FreepKing
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Move review
Rings
Starring Matilda Lutz and Vincent D’Onofrio
Polo Park, St. Vital, Towne
14A
103 minutes
★ 1/2 out of five
Other voices
At no point does the movie manage even a single sequence of sustained tension, or a frisson of genuine terror.
— Justin Chang, Los Angeles Times
Far too much effort is expended on larding in ridiculous elements and characters that send the story in all directions, none of them involving brain cells or any real sense of dread.
— Peter Howell, Toronto Star
Essentially a well-produced, easily accessed B-movie. Still, it wouldn’t kill you to watch it, and it does more than expected to reinvent its particular wheel.
— Mike McCahill, Guardian
See Julia get trapped and terrified in a crypt. See her get strangled by a murderous blind man. See her cough up the world’s longest hairball.
— Steve Newton, Georgia Straight
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Advertisement Advertise With Us
Advertisement Advertise With Us
