Music industry asks MPs for action on unauthorized use of works by generative AI
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 08/10/2025 (354 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
OTTAWA – The music industry called on the government to take action Wednesday to address unauthorized use of music by generative AI systems, helping the industry move toward a licensing system.
Representatives from music industry groups appeared before the House of Commons heritage committee, which is studying the effects of AI on creative industries.
They maintain unauthorized use amounts to theft and told members of Parliament they want copyright protection to apply. They also called for transparency requirements on AI systems’ use of copyrighted materials.
The CEO of the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada said AI companies should be required to disclose which copyright-protected works are ingested and stored in their systems.
“Without such transparency, rights holders are unable to negotiate on a level playing field and cannot prove when their works are used,” Jennifer Brown said.
She said a successful approach would “lead to a vibrant licensing market where the benefits of AI are shared with those who are vital to its development.”
Music Canada, which represents large music labels, says the government must recognize such unauthorized use as copyright infringement.
CEO Patrick Rogers pointed to how widespread piracy of music used to be before consumers shifted to online services that license music.
“We are in the Napster era of AI in the marketplace. We need to get to the iTunes stage so we can get to streaming,” he said.
Margaret McGuffin, CEO of Music Publishers Canada, said the music industry has licensing regimes already set up, including for online platforms like TikTok and Instagram.
“We’re in the business of licensing. We know how to do it. And this now needs to extend to the AI companies,” she said.
McGuffin told the committee that so much scraping of content by large tech companies has taken place that “nearly every song ever written by a Canadian songwriter has already been scraped and is already stolen by these AI companies without consent, credit or compensation.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2025.
