Mind your Ps and Qs and who’s who in group chats

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Earlier this week, Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, made the incendiary revelation that the Trump administration accidentally texted him its war plans.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 29/03/2025 (529 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Earlier this week, Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, made the incendiary revelation that the Trump administration accidentally texted him its war plans.

Goldberg was mistakenly included in a group chat (a group chat!) among U.S. national-security leaders discussing upcoming military strikes in Yemen. Obviously, Goldberg wasn’t supposed to see … any of that.

How does something like this even happen? Great question. Why does this group chat even exist? Also a great question.

Kiichiro Sato / The Associated Press
                                Top-secret war plans were sent on the Signal app.

Kiichiro Sato / The Associated Press

Top-secret war plans were sent on the Signal app.

Now, no government officials have ever texted me their war plans, but I do know a thing or two about group chats.

In the spirit of learning from others’ horrifyingly reckless mistakes and applying some take-home lessons to our own lives, let’s review some basic group-chat ground rules.

You should know who is in your group chat. This one seems like it should be pretty obvious but apparently it’s not. Top tip: know who is in your group chat. If you don’t know who is in your group chat, how can you be confident that what’s mentioned in the group chat will stay in the group chat?

Remember that different group chats serve different purposes. You might have multiple group chats representing different spheres of your life — colleagues, friends from college, parents from your kid’s school, family, book club, that one cursed chat that’s always muted — and some of these chats might be large and unwieldy.

For the sharing of high-level information — which, for regular people, means hot goss — the group chat should be small, ideally no more than four participants. To be clear, I don’t think anyone should be texting things such as war plans to anyone ever, but having 18 (!) people in a group-chat about bombing Houthi targets in Yemen, for a completely random example, is absolutely wild.

Be careful when sharing sensitive information. We all possess and handle sensitive information all day long. Sure, your sensitive information may not be a powerful nation’s full-on war plans, but it might be petty screenshots of an infuriating text thread from another group chat, or deep-in-the-creep recon about your best friend’s ex-husband’s new girlfriend.

Listen: classified info is classified info. Handle with care and utmost discretion, cut and paste with exacting precision.

Consider your use of emojis and what you are trying to convey. Whether you need to react to messages quickly or just passively acknowledge them, emojis can be useful in keeping the group chat rolling (laughing face, melting face, eye-roll face, crying face or the heart — but use with caution). But sometimes, they can be wildly inappropriate.

Again, just spitballin’ here, but maybe using the fist bump, American flag and fire emojis — or two prayer hands, a flexed bicep and two American flags — are not cool when talking about war?

We should all probably say way less in the group chat. THINK is an acronym you may have come across online encouraging people to be more thoughtful about what they post to social media by taking a quick sec to consider whether or not it’s True, Helpful, Inspiring (I would also accept Incriminating), Necessary or Kind.

It’s trite, maybe, but it’s also not wrong — especially if you value your reputation, credibility and relationships. Before participating in a group chat at all, it’s worth thinking about what you are actually contributing or — and this is key — if what’s being discussed is even group-chat material at all.

I also think it’s healthy to live with a mild fear of screenshots. After all, you just never know what might end up in a national publication.

jen.zoratti@winnipegfreepress.com

Jen Zoratti

Jen Zoratti
Columnist

Jen Zoratti is a columnist and feature writer working in the Arts & Life department, as well as the author of the weekly newsletter NEXT. A National Newspaper Award finalist for arts and entertainment writing, Jen is a graduate of the Creative Communications program at RRC Polytech and was a music writer before joining the Free Press in 2013. Read more about Jen.

Every piece of reporting Jen produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

 

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Parts of River Heights hammered by storm

Melissa Martin 5 minute read Preview

Parts of River Heights hammered by storm

Melissa Martin 5 minute read Yesterday at 5:54 PM CDT

A powerful storm cut a swath of destruction through River Heights on Sunday, leaving much of the area without power.

Nobody was hurt in the storm.

By the time it subsided, parts of the quiet neighbourhood, especially Borebank and Lindsay streets between Grant and Taylor, had been ravaged: power lines downed, Manitoba Hydro poles toppled, trees splintered and crashed down on vehicles and homes.

In one case, a vehicle was flipped into a yard and sat under a partially downed tree. Shingles were stripped from roofs. Some residents described looking out during the storm and seeing power lines ablaze and the blue glow of electricity arcing over their backyards.

Read
Yesterday at 5:54 PM CDT

Puzzles Palace

1 minute read Monday, Jul. 27, 2026

To solve our puzzles, please subscribe with this special offer: |

Manitoba doctor denies working to revive Carberry ER in response to recruitment lawsuit

Erik Pindera 4 minute read Preview

Manitoba doctor denies working to revive Carberry ER in response to recruitment lawsuit

Erik Pindera 4 minute read Sunday, Sep. 6, 2026

A Manitoba doctor has denied he was working as a recruiter after an Ontario doctor accused him of misleading him about a position at the Carberry hospital.

Dr. Klevis Iliriani, who worked at the hospital in Carberry from May to August 2024, filed his statement of claim in Court of King’s Bench earlier this year.

Iliriani, who lives in an Ottawa suburb, has alleged recruiters negligently misrepresented the job at the Carberry hospital and breached the terms of his contract, which resulted in less pay than promised.

His court filing names defendants Dr. Dave Maharajh and Barry Banek as the recruiters.

Read
Sunday, Sep. 6, 2026

Thousands affected by storm-related power outages

1 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 8:45 PM CDT

Thousands are still without power in Winnipeg after high winds and thunderstorms knocked out power lines Sunday.

About 4,000 Manitoba Hydro customers were still dealing with outages this morning after crews worked to restore power in the Westwood and River Heights areas, Hydro spokesman Peter Chura said. On Sunday, Hydro reported outages affecting approximately 6, 700 customers.

The high winds and heavy rain brought down trees and broke power poles, causing "very severe damage," in River Heights, one of the hardest-hit neighbourhoods, while some of the damage in the Westwood area appeared to be caused by lightning strikes, Chura said.

Thunderstorms rolled in at about 6 p.m. Sunday and brought heavy rain and high winds to some areas of the province. Winnipeg received about 35 mm of rain, while some areas got almost double that. More than 62 mm was recorded at The Forks and 68.8 mm was recorded at Portage Southport, according to Environment Canada.

Labour board ruling halts Dynacare strike

Carol Sanders and Erik Pindera 6 minute read Preview

Labour board ruling halts Dynacare strike

Carol Sanders and Erik Pindera 6 minute read Updated: 5:58 PM CDT

The Manitoba Labour Board has cut short a strike by 350 lab workers employed by Dynacare who administer blood and urine tests for patients in Winnipeg, Brandon and surrounding communities.

The board ruled late Tuesday afternoon that the workers, who hit the picket line at 6 a.m., must return to work Wednesday.

Jason Linklater, president of their union, the Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals, slammed the board’s decision.

“The Manitoba Labour Board is doing exactly what the government asked them to do: they are taking away our members’ right to fight for fairness,” he said in a statement.

Read
Updated: 5:58 PM CDT

Carney warns of tough times ahead in national address as retaliatory tariffs begin

Nick Murray, The Canadian Press 5 minute read Preview

Carney warns of tough times ahead in national address as retaliatory tariffs begin

Nick Murray, The Canadian Press 5 minute read Updated: 4:10 PM CDT

OTTAWA - Canada's pivot away from the United States will "come at a cost" but the alternative would be far worse, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Tuesday.

Carney made the remarks in a video released just hours after his government made good on a promise to implement retaliatory tariffs on the United States. Those tariffs respond to American duties imposed last month by U.S. President Donald Trump, after the two countries could not come to an agreement to settle some outstanding trade irritants.

Carney spent much of the video laying out Canada's response to Trump's protectionist trade policies, including expanding trade with other countries and building more capacity domestically.

But he said it "won't be easy."

Read
Updated: 4:10 PM CDT