X is a cesspool of misogyny, so why is anyone still on it?

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Why on earth are people still on X?

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/01/2026 (258 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Why on earth are people still on X?

The social media platform owned by Elon Musk plunged to horrible new depths earlier this month when Grok, a chatbot integrated within X, was used to produce sexual abuse imagery of women and children — an estimated three million sexualized images in less than two weeks, according to the U.K.’s Center for Countering Digital Hate, including 23,000 images appearing to show children.

This is it, right? This is when everyone abandons X? We all know by now that years of harassment and doxxing campaigns directed at women weren’t enough to sink the cursed app formerly known as Twitter, but surely AI-generated child sexual abuse images is the line, right?

The Associated Press Files
                                How bad does a social media platform need to get to make people log off forever?

The Associated Press Files

How bad does a social media platform need to get to make people log off forever?

No one should be on X in 2026. Certainly not Canadian politicians, and yet, still they remain.

In an interview with the Free Press about the role of X in public and political life in light of Grok, Manitoba Sen. Marilou McPhedran correctly called online abuse out as “highly profitable misogyny.”

But she still uses X, as do many other Manitoban and Canadian politicians.

“As odious as it often is to even go on X, I think it remains a primary communication tool,” McPhedran said. “As a parliamentarian, I’m looking at ways, first of all, to be on social media, be as open in communication and responsive as possible, and to call out, name and work against the exploitation.”

Respectfully, a primary communication tool for whom, exactly? Who is still using it, besides bots, ragebaiters and the creators of child sexual abuse images?

There’s nothing to save, nothing to make better. It’s a social media platform run by a billionaire who allows this stuff to happen. The decision to leave should be easy.

How bad does it need to get, exactly, to make people log off forever?

● ● ●

You know times are tough when people are nostalgic for 2016.

Shortly after the calendar flipped over to 2026, I saw an influx of social media posts on platforms that are not X celebrating what many consider the Last Good Year. At least until November, I guess.

I bristled when I saw these posts, thinking: Was it actually better in 2016 or were you just very young? Sure, it was pre-pandemic and (barely) pre-Trump, but take it from an elder millennial who was 31 in 2016: things were not as rose gold as those millennial pink walls on Instagram would have you believe.

It wasn’t so much the Last Good Year as it was the Beginning of the End.

The peachy millennial vibes that gen Z is craving via these nostalgia posts were already starting to curdle. We were imprisoned in skinny jeans. What’s become known as “Obama-era optimism” was already under threat; the toxicity of girlboss feminism and hustle culture was starting to show through the Glossier sheen. #MeToo was still a year away.

And, oh yeah, women were getting harassed on Twitter.

Recall that 2016 was also the year that people were so upset about the idea of a female Ghostbusters that star Leslie Jones was subject to a barrage of sexist, racist tweets. And that’s just a single example.

One of the greatest lies ever told was that anyone “needed” to be on Twitter “for work,” particularly people in public-facing fields such as politics and journalism. It was easy to be seduced by its promise — a town square, the world at your fingertips, a chance to swap pithy one-liners or share in a cultural moment.

Back then, Twitter was at its best and most fun during televised events such as awards shows, political debates, elections, a big season finale or the Olympics.

It feels vaguely embarrassing, now, how much stock we put into live-tweeting press conferences and slinging media gossip — mostly for the benefit of other journalists.

Even at its most popular, its usage was nowhere near that of Facebook or Instagram among the general public.

It’s incredible how much harassment and misogyny women put up with as being par for the course because we “needed” to be on Twitter, and how little was ever done about it. Yes, some people wanted to be there, but eventually the question became, for what?

And then Musk bought it 2022, and now it’s an unusable cesspool of slop, abuse and propaganda.

I held on to my account for far too long, tweeting links to my Free Press articles into the abyss and being harassed by men until, finally, I obliterated it for good last year.

I don’t miss it. I don’t even think about it.

It’s beyond time for everyone who is still on it to do the same.

winnipegfreepress.com/jenzoratti

Jen Zoratti

Jen Zoratti
Columnist

Jen Zoratti is a columnist and feature writer working in the Arts & Life department, as well as the author of the weekly newsletter NEXT. A National Newspaper Award finalist for arts and entertainment writing, Jen is a graduate of the Creative Communications program at RRC Polytech and was a music writer before joining the Free Press in 2013. Read more about Jen.

Every piece of reporting Jen produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

 

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Bit of creepy consultation could go a long way

Maureen Scurfield 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: Halloween has always been my favourite time of year. I do my house up with lots of spooky lighting and characters on the lawn with eerie sounds booming out.

But last year I got seriously hassled by some people in the neighbourhood who thought it was too creepy. How do I get them on board this year? I don’t want to fight with them again.

— Want to Be Good Neighbour, River Heights

Dear Good Neighbour: Go to your close neighbours and explain what you want to do with your yard for Halloween this year, and also provide them with a firm time by which the celebrating will wrap up and things can quiet down.

X is a cesspool of misogyny, so why is anyone still on it?

Jen Zoratti 5 minute read Preview

X is a cesspool of misogyny, so why is anyone still on it?

Jen Zoratti 5 minute read Saturday, Jan. 24, 2026

No one should be on X in 2026. Certainly not Canadian politicians, and yet, still they remain.

Read
Saturday, Jan. 24, 2026

PCs renew calls for CFS inquiry

Carol Sanders 6 minute read Preview

PCs renew calls for CFS inquiry

Carol Sanders 6 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 7:54 PM CDT

The Progressive Conservatives renewed calls to put Manitoba’s child and welfare system under the microscope Thursday, tabling a motion that urged the province to appoint a commissioner to lead a public inquiry.

Families critic Jodie Byram’s opposition day motion, which was ultimately defeated by the NDP majority, reiterated demands for an inquiry into the systemic failures of Child and Family Services, more than 20 years after the death of Phoenix Sinclair first prompted demands for answers.

“We have seen far too many children die under the care of CFS, and we need to determine where the gaps are in the system in order to make the system a safer place for children,” Byram told reporters before the motion was defeated in the legislature.

Families Minister Nahanni Fontaine said in an interview that her department, CFS agencies and authorities are “doing good work” and won’t call an inquiry.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 7:54 PM CDT

Booze sales down, gaming and cannabis up in Manitoba

Carol Sanders 4 minute read Preview

Booze sales down, gaming and cannabis up in Manitoba

Carol Sanders 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

MANITOBA Liquor and Lotteries delivered $724.1 million in profits to the province in 2025-26, with the lion’s share coming from alcohol, even as booze sales continue to shrink.

The Crown corporation’s contribution to Manitoba’s general revenues decreased by $6 million or 0.8 per cent from last year’s allocation of $730.1 million, its annual report shows.

That indicates stable overall performance “despite a changing operating environment,” the recently-released report said.

Those changes include the order from Premier Wab Kinew last year to remove U.S. alcohol from Liquor Mart store shelves after President Donald Trump launched a trade war against Canada as well as Manitobans’ changing tastes.

Read
Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Dozens of Uber, Lyft drivers switched to cheaper insurance coverage: MPI probe

Erik Pindera 5 minute read Preview

Dozens of Uber, Lyft drivers switched to cheaper insurance coverage: MPI probe

Erik Pindera 5 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 6:09 PM CDT

Ride-service drivers have been defrauding Manitoba Public Insurance by improperly insuring their vehicles as for personal use.

The public insurer and the City of Winnipeg, which regulates ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft, discovered the widespread fraud after MPI conducted a review in December last year.

“When a driver changes their coverage from ride-share insurance to a personal vehicle coverage and continues to operate as a ride-share driver, that is fraud, plain and simple,” said MPI chief executive officer Satvir Jatana at a news conference Thursday.

MPI’s review looked at a random sample of 408 ride-hailing vehicles and found 108 were operating without the proper vehicle-for-hire insurance coverage. In order to register with the city as a ride-service driver, a vehicle must have such insurance and proof must be provided to the ride-booking company.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 6:09 PM CDT

Sex offender who changed name sent back to prison

Dean Pritchard 7 minute read Preview

Sex offender who changed name sent back to prison

Dean Pritchard 7 minute read Wednesday, Oct. 7, 2026

The father of a boy repeatedly abused by convicted sex predator Ryan Knight said he believes his son would have been kept safe had there been a law in place preventing sex offenders from legally changing their name.

Read
Wednesday, Oct. 7, 2026