‘Bouncing’ Bombers are due for disaster

Form chart says they're sure bets to lose today

Advertisement

Advertise with us

When a thoroughbred immediately follows an unusually strong performance with an unusually weak performance, the term used in horse racing is that the horse "bounced."

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$0 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*No charge for 4 weeks then price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 13/10/2012 (4773 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

When a thoroughbred immediately follows an unusually strong performance with an unusually weak performance, the term used in horse racing is that the horse “bounced.”

The bounce theory — widely credited to an American handicapper named Len Ragozin — postulates that thoroughbreds are particularly prone to sub-par performances immediately after they have put forth a peak effort.

 

WAYNE GLOWACKI / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS
Bombers strong-side linebacker Jovon Johnson will have his hands full with Stamps receiver Nik Lewis today.
WAYNE GLOWACKI / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Bombers strong-side linebacker Jovon Johnson will have his hands full with Stamps receiver Nik Lewis today.

In a sport where past performance is generally expected to dictate future performance, Ragozin’s theory — because it so counter-intuitive — is often used by handicappers to spot upsets before they happen, allowing them to cash in long shots at big prices.

We interrupt your regularly scheduled coverage of the Canadian Football League with that little piece of trivia from the Sport of Kings because the last time the Bombers won two games in a row was August, 2011. That’s a span of 26 games — 12 last year, including two playoff games, and 14 this year — without consecutive victories.

The particulars:

Since capping a five-game winning streak with a 30-27 win over Hamilton at home on Aug. 26, 2011, the Bombers record has looked like this: two losses, a win, two losses, a win, a loss, a win, two losses, a win (in the 2011 East final), a loss (in the Grey Cup), four losses (to start this season), a win (over Edmonton), a loss, a win (over Hamilton), four losses, a win (over Hamilton), a loss (to Toronto) and finally a win over Montreal last weekend.

A novice handicapper — or a second-grader — could tell you what is most likely to happen next in that particular pattern. All of which brings us to this afternoon’s game (noon, TSN, CJOB) at Canad Inns Stadium between the Bombers and the Calgary Stampeders.

As hard as it is to fathom given the trials of this Bombers team and their woeful 4-10 regular-season record, the Bombers continue to retain multiple legitimate paths to the post-season.

But while the pathways are varied, they will all lead nowhere over the course of the final four weeks of this tortured season unless the Bombers can finally figure out a way to actually win more than just once in a row.

“In the CFL, you need to string wins together. And that’s been our pitfall,” safety Ian Logan said in the Bombers locker-room Friday morning following a brief and chilly light practice. “Our problem has been, play well one week and then not play well the next week. Each individual has to take it upon themselves to bring their A-game every single day.

“This is our profession and what we do. There’s no excuses for not showing up for a game.”

So if there’s no excuses, how come it keeps happening? Offensive lineman Glenn January says sometimes a banana is just a banana.

“Some things in life just can’t be explained,” said the veteran tackle with a laugh. “And this is probably one of them.”

In racing, the bounce theory presupposes that horses regress off peak efforts because they are still in a recovery period from an episode of maximum physical exertion. But that doesn’t really apply in football — or at least it shouldn’t apply in a sport where, like Logan says, the players are supposed to make a maximum physical effort every single time they’re on the field.

You could argue the Bombers haven’t won consecutive games this season for the simple reason that they just aren’t very good, not to mention the revolving door at starting quarterback. But how does that explain why they also couldn’t do it for the better part of last year in a season in which they opened at 7-1 — including that five-game winning streak; had the same starting quarterback for 18 of 20 games; and went all the way to the Grey Cup?

A punter — the horse racing kind, not the football kind — would tell you it doesn’t matter why. What matters is that for the past 14 months, the surest bet in all of sport has been against the Bombers a week after a win.

paul.wiecek@freepress.mb.ca

Report Error Submit a Tip

Columnists

LOAD MORE