Ostrowski files $16-M wrongful conviction lawsuit
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Winnipeg Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*$1 will be added to your next bill. After your 4 weeks access is complete your rate will increase by $0.00 a X percent off the regular rate.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 16/06/2020 (1907 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
Nearly two years after Manitoba’s highest court added his name to the list of the province’s wrongfully convicted, Frank Ostrowski has filed a $16-million lawsuit against those he alleges played a role in sending him to prison for 23 years for a murder he says he didn’t commit.
Ostrowski, 70, was convicted in 1987 of orchestrating the drug-related shooting death of 22-year-old Robert Nieman and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years.
In 2018, nine years after he was released on bail pending a federal review of his case, the Manitoba Court of Appeal stayed Ostrowski’s murder conviction — ruling an undisclosed prosecution deal with police informant Matthew Lovelace, in return for his testimony, resulted in a miscarriage of justice.

Also not disclosed to the defence were notes and a report from a Winnipeg Police Service officer, Sgt. N. Jacobson, who had a phone conversation with the informant a few hours before the slaying, during which Lovelace identified another man, not Nieman, as the target of a shooting.
A statement of claim filed Monday names 12 defendants, including the Attorney General of Canada, retired Manitoba judge Judith Webster, veteran defence lawyer Hymie Weinstein and former Winnipeg police chief Herb Stephen.
The lawsuit alleges the defendants “willfully disregarded” Ostrowski’s constitutional right to make full answer and defence to the charges against him.
“The conduct of the defendants was malicious, high-handed, outrageous, reckless, wanton, entirely without care, intentional,” alleges the lawsuit.
Reached by phone, Ostrowski declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying only, “It’s a long time coming,” before referring a reporter to his lawyer.
The senior prosecutor in the case was George Dangerfield, the same prosecutor tied to the wrongful convictions of Kyle Unger, James Driskell and Thomas Sophonow.
In 1986, Weinstein was representing Lovelace on drug trafficking charges when he made a deal with federal prosecutors to stay the charges if Lovelace testified against Ostrowski. At Ostrowski’s 2009 bail hearing, Weinstein testified he asked that no one tell Lovelace of the deal at the time, as it would “taint his evidence.”
At a hearing before the Manitoba Court of Appeal in 2017, Webster — a federal prosecutor in 1986 — testified she had “no memory” of the Ostrowski file, and said she did not know specific details of the deal with Lovelace.
Another then-federal prosecutor assigned to the case died one day after testifying before the Manitoba Court of Appeal in November 2016. An obituary notice in the Free Press makes no mention of the cause of death.
“The federal Crowns, Weinstein and (Jake) Haasbeek (a city police officer and defendant involved in Lovelace’s initial arrest) ignored that the Lovelace deal was ‘subject to confirmation with the provincial Crown,’” says the lawsuit. “The federal Crowns, Weinstein, and Haasbeek never advised or sought permission from the provincial Crowns about the Lovelace deal. They treated the Lovelace deal as if it was an unconditional three-party agreement.”
At Ostrowski’s trial, Dangerfield, who is not a named defendant, “presented Lovelace to the jury as reformed and having decide to get out of the criminal underworld and to live a legitimate lifestyle,” says the lawsuit. “According to Dangerfield, his motive for testifying was therefore purely altruistic.”
Ostrowski was convicted of trafficking in 1992, and sentenced to 15 years in prison. But for his murder conviction, he would have been eligible for day parole after serving 2 1/2 years, says the lawsuit.
The allegations have not been proven in court and no statements of defence have been filed.
dean.pritchard@freepress.mb.ca

Dean Pritchard is courts reporter for the Free Press. He has covered the justice system since 1999, working for the Brandon Sun and Winnipeg Sun before joining the Free Press in 2019. Read more about Dean.
Every piece of reporting Dean produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.