Alberta judge rejects Super Channel parent’s request to block sale of set-top boxes
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 03/05/2021 (1966 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
EDMONTON – An Alberta court has rejected an Edmonton company’s request to block four Canadian retailers from selling set-top boxes that allegedly can be used to illegally access its programming offerings.
Allarco Entertainment named Staples Canada, Best Buy Canada, London Drugs and Canada Computers in its application for an injunction to protect its Super Channel pay-television service from intellectual property theft.
Allarco also asked Alberta’s Court of Queen’s Bench to issue an order against an unknown number of unidentified customers of the retailers as well as unidentified equipment suppliers.
But Justice Michael Lema completely rejected Allarco’s requests for court injunctions in a ruling dated April 30.
Lema’s 33-page ruling says Allarco failed to provide any legal justification for preventing the retailers from selling this type of set-top box, or that Super Channel’s subscriber base declined because consumers used such devices to access its content illegally.
The judge also said the retailers are entitled to have Allarco pay for the cost of defending the action but didn’t set an amount and invited the defendants to make further submissions by May 7.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 3, 2021.