Judge rules some redacted police docs to be made evidence in ‘Freedom Convoy’ trial
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 03/11/2023 (705 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
OTTAWA – The judge in the criminal trial of two “Freedom Convoy” organizers ruled on Friday that portions of redacted internal police documents should be admitted as evidence.
Justice Heather Perkins-McVey said some information that police initially redacted from documents is protected by solicitor-client privilege, but some of it has to do with opinions or statements by officers that should be admissible.
Crown prosecutors and the Ottawa Police Service had argued that the documents should stay redacted because they concerned lawyers’ advice or were irrelevant to the proceedings.
Perkins-McVey explained that communications between a solicitor and client that are related to legal advice and intended as confidential are covered, but that privilege is waived when documentation is voluntarily or inadvertently disclosed to a third party.
“There is no dispute that legal advice from the Crown to police can be covered by solicitor-client privilege, (but it) may fall within an exception,” she said in her decision’s summary.
“Some of it is properly claimed as solicitor-client privilege, some of it is waived, or it is the musings or opinion of the officer, not coming from the Crown.”
The documents contain emails as well as information about a software update for officers’ cellphones after the end of the early 2022 demonstrations, which may have deleted messages between organizers and police liaison officers.
Chris Barber and Tamara Lich face multiple charges, including mischief, counselling others to commit mischief and intimidation in relation to the protests against COVID-19 public-health measures.
The Crown is seeking to prove that Lich and Barber exerted influence over protesters’ actions.
The matter adjourned early in the day on Friday. A hearing is expected to be held on Nov. 8 to set more trial dates.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 3, 2023.
Related Articles
Defence begins its case in convoy trial
Advertisement Advertise With Us