Crown appeals Vancouver Island sexual-assault case tossed over ‘unreasonable’ delays
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.99/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 07/05/2025 (323 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
VANCOUVER – Crown prosecutors in British Columbia have filed an appeal in a sexual-assault case that was tossed out over unreasonable delays last month.
The accused, who is only identified by his initials because of a publication ban, was charged with sexual assault causing bodily harm and assault involving two alleged victims after he was arrested in July 2023.
Provincial Court Judge Ted Gouge ruled in Duncan last month that the delays in the trial were beyond the 18-month “presumptive ceiling” set by the Supreme Court of Canada in provincial criminal prosecutions.
Gouge’s ruling says the “window” for the case to be tried in a reasonable time ended in late March, and the Crown did not blame any of the trial delays on the man’s defence lawyer.
An earlier ruling in the case dealt with disclosure of “several thousand text messages” exchanged by the two female complainants after the alleged assaults on June 30, 2023, and Gouge ordered them disclosed to the defence in January.
The Crown’s appeal filed in Vancouver on Tuesday says Gouge was wrong to find the delays were unreasonable and it’s seeking a new trial on the same charges.
The provincial court judge found that disclosure of the text messages he ordered “remained incomplete” in late January, and a lawyer for one of the complainants applied in B.C. Supreme Court in February to quash the order for the texts to be disclosed.
“Of interest to the defence, some of the text messages refer to the complainants’ alcohol consumption that evening, and its effect on their memory of the events,” Gouge’s January ruling says. “Others discuss what remedies the complainants might seek and their interactions with investigating police officers.”
The judge found that disclosure issues in the case unlikely to be “resolved” before the trial was to begin, and no investigating police officers gave “evidence to identify any unusual difficulties faced by them in their attempts to comply with the Crown’s disclosure obligations.”
The accused’s defence lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the appeal.
A lawyer for one of the complainants seeking to quash the disclosure order for the text messages declined to comment on the Crown’s appeal, and the other complainant’s lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the case.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 7, 2025.