Federal-provincial deal could improve quality, access to health-care data

If Ottawa’s new health-care funding agreement with the provinces provides Canadians with improved data on wait times and medical outcomes, there could be something to salvage out of this deal, after all.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$1 per week for 24 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Winnipeg Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*$1 will be added to your next bill. After your 4 weeks access is complete your rate will increase by $0.00 a X percent off the regular rate.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 14/02/2023 (935 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

If Ottawa’s new health-care funding agreement with the provinces provides Canadians with improved data on wait times and medical outcomes, there could be something to salvage out of this deal, after all.

But don’t hold your breath.

The premiers this week accepted Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s new funding offer, which includes $46 billion over 10 years in extra cash (an annual top-up of about $166 million for Manitoba). It won’t have a material impact on health-care delivery, largely because Canada’s government-controlled system of rationing medical services won’t change.

There is more money on the table, which may slightly improve the quality of medical services Canadians receive. To unlock the full cash amount, provinces must play along with the federal government’s “targeted spending” initiatives (where federal politicians buy photo ops with provincial health ministers on specific funding announcements).

Beyond that, it will be business as usual for Canada’s medicare system — a collection of 13 provincial and territorial insurance plans that run independent of Ottawa under the loosely enforced Canada Health Act.

 

There may be one exception that could come out of this deal: improved health-care data for Canadians. Ottawa says some of the new funding is contingent on provinces upping their game on collecting and disseminating statistics that measure wait times and hospital operations. It’s unclear what that means specifically, or how those conditions would apply. Like most aspects of this deal, few details have been released.

Still, if it forces provinces to provide Canadians with a clearer picture of how their health dollars are spent, it could be one of the few tangible benefits to emerge from the agreement.

Health-care data in Canada is a mess. Not only is there no uniform way of collecting it nationally, the methodology often differs within provinces, sometimes from one hospital to the next. Statistics published by provincial governments are usually incomplete, unreliable or out of date.

In Manitoba, for example, most wait-time data is not published at all, largely because there are no central wait-time registries for procedures such as shoulder surgery or hernia operations. Even data that is published for procedures such as hip and knee replacements or cardiac surgery is dated. Some of it is misleading.

The Stefanson government dumped $110 million into its Diagnostic and Surgical Recovery Task Force last year to clear COVID-19 pandemic backlogs. Among its tasks is to publish accurate, up-to-date data to show progress on reducing wait times. However, there’s only a handful of surgical and other medical procedures listed on the task force’s online dashboard. For the most part, government simply reformatted existing Manitoba Health statistics (which have been available online for years) and posted them on the new site.

SEAN KILPATRICK / CANADIAN PRESS FILES
                                Prime Minister Justin Trudeau flips open a briefing book titled ‘Working Meeting of First Ministers On Health Care’ as he meets with Canada’s premiers in Ottawa last week. Premier Heather Stefanson sits to his right and Quebec Premier Francois Legault to his left.

SEAN KILPATRICK / CANADIAN PRESS FILES

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau flips open a briefing book titled ‘Working Meeting of First Ministers On Health Care’ as he meets with Canada’s premiers in Ottawa last week. Premier Heather Stefanson sits to his right and Quebec Premier Francois Legault to his left.

It’s also old information. As of Tuesday, the most recent wait-time data available on the task-force dashboard is from November.

And it’s incomplete, not including the time it takes for Manitobans to see a specialist (only the time from specialist to surgery). It includes only “median” wait times, not those in the 90th-percentile (which provides a more realistic estimate of how long many people are waiting). And the dashboard goes back only to 2019, even though government has data that dates back to the early 2000s.

Manitoba’s wait-time data for cataract surgery is so misleading, it’s essentially useless. Most surgeries are performed on each eye separately, usually days apart. The wait time for the first eye is the long one — sometimes a year or more. The time between the first and second eye is much shorter, usually a few days or a week. Instead of publishing the wait time for the first eye, which is how long people truly wait for cataract surgery, government calculates the average of the first and second eye and publishes that as the “median wait time for cataract surgery.” It’s a deliberate attempt to mislead.

Will the new health accord fix any of this? Will provinces be forced to improve the quality of the data they publish, including making it more comprehensive? Will they at least be encouraged to do so? We can only hope.

tom.brodbeck@freepress.mb.ca

Tom Brodbeck

Tom Brodbeck
Columnist

Tom Brodbeck is an award-winning author and columnist with over 30 years experience in print media. He joined the Free Press in 2019. Born and raised in Montreal, Tom graduated from the University of Manitoba in 1993 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics and commerce. Read more about Tom.

Tom provides commentary and analysis on political and related issues at the municipal, provincial and federal level. His columns are built on research and coverage of local events. The Free Press’s editing team reviews Tom’s columns before they are posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press’s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip