Louis Riel teachers prepare for AI impact

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Teachers in the Louis Riel School Division have drafted guidelines to leverage and regulate artificial intelligence in their classrooms.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Monthly Digital Subscription

$1 per week for 24 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

Monthly Digital Subscription

$4.75/week*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Winnipeg Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

No thanks

*$1 will be added to your next bill. After your 4 weeks access is complete your rate will increase by $0.00 a X percent off the regular rate.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 24/02/2025 (219 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Teachers in the Louis Riel School Division have drafted guidelines to leverage and regulate artificial intelligence in their classrooms.

“Instead of trying to ignore this society-changing technology that’s integrating into everything at lightning speed, as a team we decided to not shy away,” said Matt Stelmack, a Grade 9 teacher at Nelson McIntyre Collegiate.

“If we don’t get ahead of it, our students are going to use it and use it improperly.”

Mike Sudoma / Free Press files
                                Instructional support teacher Melissa Burns says she is realistic about students’ screen-time habits and that they typically interact with tech through a ‘passive lens’ at home.

Mike Sudoma / Free Press files

Instructional support teacher Melissa Burns says she is realistic about students’ screen-time habits and that they typically interact with tech through a ‘passive lens’ at home.

Stelmack often uses chatbots — software applications or web interfaces designed to have textual or spoken conversations — to reduce mundane and time-intensive tasks, such as rewriting texts to be at various levels so all of his students can participate, regardless of their comprehension skills.

He is one of 42 high school teachers who participated in weekly meetings last winter to discuss how AI was changing their teaching methods and assessment practices.

The group’s consensus? AI can be used to personalize student lessons and save time, but teachers have to be co-learners with their students because the tech is ever-changing.

The emergence of “generative tech” — AI that can create content in multiple forms — has allowed Stelmack to provide “on the fly feedback” with quick turnaround replies to student submissions. He said it has also forced him to rethink online homework and assign students handwritten projects to deter AI-related shortcuts.

The November 2022 release of ChatGPT immediately raised concerns among teachers that it could replace their jobs and tempt students to cheat by simply inserting a prompt and clicking a button.

As the platform grew in popularity and other tools appeared online, including Google Gemini and Microsoft’s Copilot, Melissa Burns began researching the emerging technology’s potential and pitfalls for LRSD.

Within a year, the instructional support teacher was planning “AI cohorts” to hear teachers’ concerns and policy proposals for positive use in local public schools. Educator groups met weekly last year, between February and June.

Burns said she is realistic about her students’ screen-time habits and the fact that they are typically interacting with tech through a “passive lens” at home.

Her hope is that bringing AI into the classroom allows for critical reflections and “uncomfortable conversations around the impact of technology on society, on our planet, etc.,” she said.

Burns and her boss updated school trustees and administrators on their AI-related research at a recent board meeting.

During their presentation, information systems director Clarke Hagan spoke about AI being the latest “major disrupter” in education, arriving long after calculators and computers.

“We’re going to proceed slowly and carefully,” Hagan said.

The manager recalled a society-wide debate over blocking AI in schools when ChatGPT was invented and Supt. Christian Michalik’s “right answer” — the division did not keep students from it.

“This is not something we can hide from and, so, whatever is going to come our way, the only way through it is education,” Hagan, who likens AI to “a helpful assistant with a very smart brain,” told the meeting.

LRSD has invited Katina Papulkas, a Pickering, Ont.-based education strategist at Dell Technologies, to run a professional development session for staff in the spring.

Papulkas is expected to discuss different entry points for teachers to use chatbots and the importance of writing clear and informed prompts so tools generate useful answers.

As division leaders makes sense of the new technology, Michalik said issues including academic integrity, equitable access to AI tools and the prospect of using it to better personalize lessons are all top of mind.

“We have to concern ourselves with privacy, because what makes AI work, of course, is data,” he said, noting that users must also be wary of algorithm bias.

Formal guidance for AI use in LRSD classrooms, including necessary safeguards for students and staff, is on track to be finalized before the end of the school year.

The Manitoba Association of Education Technology Leaders created an informational poster for teachers shortly after ChatGPT was released.

The group urged educators to explore AI tools while prioritizing “actual intelligence” before using them. MAETL endorses reviewing a program’s terms of service and privacy policy and respecting others’ intellectual property.

maggie.macintosh@freepress.mb.ca

Maggie Macintosh

Maggie Macintosh
Education reporter

Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Free Press. Originally from Hamilton, Ont., she first reported for the Free Press in 2017. Read more about Maggie.

Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative.

Every piece of reporting Maggie produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Local

LOAD MORE