Landlocked pipelines wasting our potential

Advertisement

Advertise with us

Imagine if Brian Epstein had never seen the Beatles. If John, Paul, George and Ringo had continued to play, undiscovered, in the Cavern Club, how many people would have heard them? What would their estates and copyrights be worth today? Hard to imagine squandering such natural gifts.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe with this special offer:

All-Access Digital Subscription

$1.50 for 150 days*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Continue

*Pay $1.50 for the first 22 weeks of your subscription. After 22 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 per month. GST will be added to each payment. Subscription can be cancelled after the first 22 weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 14/10/2016 (2243 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Imagine if Brian Epstein had never seen the Beatles. If John, Paul, George and Ringo had continued to play, undiscovered, in the Cavern Club, how many people would have heard them? What would their estates and copyrights be worth today? Hard to imagine squandering such natural gifts.

It’s not a lot different, when you think of it, with Canada’s natural resources. And squandering, in effect, is what we’re doing today with the economic potential of our oil resources. They are effectively landlocked, due to the inability to get the barrels to seaport and a broader market. Alberta’s oil is locked to North America, especially U.S. distribution, which cuts the per-barrel price by about $14 as of August, when Alberta crude was selling for about $31/barrel.

Without pipeline access to tidewater — and therefore to new international markets — Canada will continue to pay an economic penalty.

No one is saying this country, or its producers, should build pipelines without diligent and sensitive consideration and mitigation of environmental impacts — protecting sensitive or at-risk territories, waterways and species. That’s not the Canadian way.

Recent approvals — the $36-billion Pacific Northwest LNG project, for example — should give all Canadians, including those whose communities and traditional lands are most directly affected, comfort in the environmental review and vetting process. The Trudeau government last week gave the LNG project the green light, predicated on 190 conditions.

The careful, public environmental review (combined with regulated monitoring and reporting during project development, construction and lifetime operation) illustrates the value Canadians place on their land, water and communities and on respect for the constitutional rights of indigenous people.

But landlocking the country’s natural wealth is beyond misguided. It wastes Canada’s potential to realize economic growth and security — the lifeblood of our governments’ treasuries, revenues which support the social programs that make our standard of living the envy of the world. It also stymies the development of the best human talent in science, engineering and industry innovation. Why would we turn our backs on our youth, send them packing for careers and jobs elsewhere?

What, in hard numbers, are we “turning our backs” on? Here are a few things:

According to a 2015 Conference Board of Canada report, the $6.8-billion Trans Mountain pipeline expansion holds 678,000 person-years of employment.

Energy East would be worth $16.8 billion in GDP for the Canadian economy during the nine-year development and construction phase alone, according to a report commissioned by the company behind it.

Enbridge says its $7.9-billion Northern Gateway pipeline project would create up to 3,000 jobs during peak construction.

Long-term employment connected to the three projects would be more than 38,000 total jobs per year.

This is important to the West, and to all of Canada. Pipelines, as with all strategic infrastructure investments, are key to the country’s economic prosperity. They, like roads and rail and marine assets, deserve to be supported through careful and wise public policy. They are what Prime Minister Justin Trudeau refers to when he talks about “nation-building” projects in his government’s infrastructure-investment plan.

These projects are the foundation for future-wealth generation to support jobs, good incomes and strong communities. They provide the silk for the fabric of our social-welfare programs.

Chris Lorenc is president of the Manitoba Heavy Construction Association.

History

Updated on Saturday, October 15, 2016 10:51 AM CDT: Deck removed.

Report Error Submit a Tip

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Analysis

LOAD MORE ANALYSIS