Musk, Trump and Mao
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.00 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.75/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
The only place where some people still see Elon Musk as a political genius is China. “Brother Musk, you’ve got over a billion people on our side backing you,” wrote a fan on Weibo, China’s biggest social media site. “If Elon Musk were to found a political party,” wrote another, “his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics.”
Distance lends enchantment, but the home market is a harder sell. Back in the U.S. a few days later, when Musk announced the foundation of the “America Party,” the public response fell considerably short of rhapsodic. Tesla shares fell 7.5 per cent the next day and Musk’s personal stake in the company fell by US$10 billion.
U.S. President Donald Trump pretended pity for his former ally for about 10 seconds — “I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely off the rails” he posted online — before reverting to form: “The one thing third parties are good for is the creation of complete and total disruption and chaos.”
Like a stopped clock, Trump is occasionally right, and this may be one of those times. Musk may seem completely out of control, but if he gets the strategy right, his new political party could spread disruption and chaos right within the ranks of the Republican Party.
Most American political analysts have dismissed the electoral prospects of Musk’s new party. After all, new third parties have not broken the grip of the two-party system in the United States for more than a century. However, third parties have often determined the outcome in races between the two big parties.
There isn’t time for Musk to build a countrywide third party in the 20 months between now and the midterm elections for the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives in November 2026. That’s when he plans to launch his first challenge to Trump, but he doesn’t need a nationwide party for that. Indeed, he probably never intends to go that route.
All Musk has to do in 2026 is unseat two or three Republican incumbents in the Senate and half a dozen in the House, and the Republicans lose control of both houses of Congress. Concentrate on 20 Republican-held Senate seats and 50 marginal House seats and spend a hundred million dollars in each one. That ought to do the trick.
Would Musk really do that? It would be one of history’s biggest tantrums, and all he would get out of it is the satisfaction of creating a potential majority in congress that might repeal or at least modify Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill.” Trump would still be president, but Musk really seems to believe that an extra US$3 trillion on the national debt matters.
Would Musk get away with it? Of course not. However, the measures Trump would take to thwart Musk’s strategy might mark a decisive break with the current constitutional order. Many people fear it’s coming anyway, but in practice it needs a crisis. This could be it.
Foreign analysts can sometimes see analogies and parallels in American politics that Americans themselves miss. Some Chinese scholars, in particular, make disturbing comparisons between Trump and Mao.
Zhang Qianfan, a constitutional law professor in Beijing, calls the rapid Trumpist takeover of U.S. politics against only feeble resistance “America’s Cultural Revolution.” Ding Xueliang, once a Red Guard and now professor of Chinese politics at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, says “It’s not identical, but there are certainly parallels.”
Many people in China see the war on “woke” and on elite universities in America, the mistrust of bureaucracy, the hatred of the “deep state,” and the cult of the leader as symptoms of an anti-intellectual drive as strong as that in China under Mao. Above all, they remember that Mao destroyed the bureaucracy, purged the Party, and effectively made himself emperor.
“During Trump’s presidential inauguration speech, Republican lawmakers all stood up and applauded with such fervor that it rivaled North Korea. These are deeply troubling signs,” Zhang said. Or as Trump said when Xi Jinping abolished term limits and made himself president-for-life: “I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot someday.”
Gwynne Dyer’s new book is Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World’s Climate Engineers.