On this, Ricky Gervais and I will never agree
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Monthly Digital Subscription
$1 per week for 24 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $4.00 plus GST every four weeks. After 24 weeks, price increases to the regular rate of $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
Monthly Digital Subscription
$4.99/week*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Billed as $19.95 plus GST every four weeks. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
*Your next subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $16.99 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $23.99 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
There’s plenty to like about Ricky Gervais: his acerbic wit, his fierce advocacy for animals, his merciless skewering of celebrities during his Golden Globes hosting gig and his emotionally intelligent and empathetic writing in great shows like After Life and Derek.
I can say with unabashed star-struckedness (or at least I could if that was a word) that one of the highlights of my experience on X (then Twitter) was when he responded to one of my tweets about his unerring depiction of dementia on After Life.
But there are some issues where we are decidedly not in the same lane.
NETFLIX
A scene from Ricky Gervais: Armageddon on Netflix. Columnist Pam Frampton is a fan of the British comic — except for his recent Grammy post on social media.
I don’t like his anti-trans jokes.
I don’t share his fascination with the four-letter C-word.
And I completely disagree with his social media post about the 2026 Grammy Awards, held Feb. 1.
The high-profile celebration of music was particularly notable this year for its political content. Multiple artists — including Canadians Joni Mitchell and Justin Bieber — wore “ICE out” pins as a means of signalling their opposition to the recent thuggery of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, while other artists used their moments in the winner’s circle to get their activist messages out.
“From acceptance speeches to red carpet accessories, the ceremony became a co-ordinated display of opposition to the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown,” Forbes reported the day after the show in an article by Hannah Abraham aptly headlined Every reference to ICE at the 2026 Grammy Awards.
From Billie Eilish’s unadorned “F—k ICE” to Bad Bunny’s heartfelt “We’re not savages, we’re not animals, we’re not aliens, we are humans and we are Americans,” artists used the spotlight to illuminate ICE activities. And no wonder. Around 70,000 people have been detained as of early January 2026 — “the highest level in recorded history,” Forbes reported.
In response to all of this political messaging, Gervais tweeted a quote from his 2020 Golden Globes monologue in front of Hollywood royalty: “If you do win an award tonight, don’t use it as a platform to make a political speech. You’re in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg.”
Gervais prefaced the Feb. 2 post with the words “They’re still not listening” and a “face with tears of joy” emoji.
But guess what? A lot of people who may have been laughing then aren’t laughing now.
As of this writing, the post had been retweeted 56,000 times (not that that’s a clear indication of support for or opposition to Gervais’ original statement) and had garnered close to 7,000 responses — many of them in agreement, but some pointing out his hypocrisy.
From someone who sells out arenas with his wildly popular standup act, the British comic seems to have failed somewhat in his reading of this room.
“Privilege is a helluva drug,” someone with the X handle BrooklynDad_Defiant! posted. “Imagine being so unaffected by the plight of those less fortunate than you that a few words said on behalf of them seem more unbearable than the reality of those things (that) are happening.”
@GretaGrace20 commented: “We now have state-sponsored assassination of American citizens. Your once-funny line is two murders past its expiration date, dude,” in reference to the shooting deaths of ICE observers/protesters Renée Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis at the hands of an ICE officer and border patrol agents, respectively.
Gonzalo wrote: “Does this apply to you, Ricky? Or just to the rest of showbiz personnel.”
Now, everyone knows that being an artist and being intelligent are not mutually exclusive, so I’ll ignore Gervais’ Thunberg crack. It’s a cheap joke and he’s done much better.
But the rest of what he said is troubling.
Gervais has used various platforms for political discourse on many occasions, speaking out on topics that include animal cruelty, policies that encourage homeless people to abandon their pets, censorship (in the context of ads for his Dutch Barn vodka), atheism and wokeism. More power to him.
So why shouldn’t he expect angry artists with a microphone and an audience numbering in the millions to do the same?
Does Gervais himself reflect his knowledge of the “real world” when he posts photos of his newish multi-million-dollar Hampstead Heath mansion on X? I, for one, don’t begrudge his posh digs, but could it be that he has become so accustomed to the trappings of fame that he sometimes forgets we aren’t all living in La-La Land?
I would expect someone as outspoken and free-thinking as Gervais to encourage artists not to play it safe and to call out intimidation, oppression and state-endorsed violence whenever they have the opportunity.
And perhaps he should revisit this quote of his: “How arrogant are you to think that you deserve to go through life with no one ever saying anything that you don’t agree with or like?”
Pam Frampton lives in St. John’s. Email pamelajframpton@gmail.com | X: @Pam_Frampton | Bluesky: @pamframpton.bsky.social
Pam Frampton is a columnist for the Free Press. She has worked in print media since 1990 and has been offering up her opinions for more than 20 years. Read more about Pam.
Pam’s columns are built on facts, but offer her personal views through arguments and analysis. Every column Pam produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press‘s tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press’s history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.