You and ex-wife could work again — with help

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My divorced wife came back to visit me and said, “I’ve reached the point I don’t want a baby anymore, and I want you back!” This woman left me and broke my heart because she couldn’t get pregnant by me. She put the blame on me for her heartache.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 20/09/2024 (696 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: My divorced wife came back to visit me and said, “I’ve reached the point I don’t want a baby anymore, and I want you back!” This woman left me and broke my heart because she couldn’t get pregnant by me. She put the blame on me for her heartache.

But life’s tough, and it turned out her second husband couldn’t get her pregnant either. Now he’s left her, because he was so tired of her pestering him for a baby, and she’s just hitting menopause. Now she’s looking back over her shoulder at me, the guy who loved her and treated her like gold.

Why? Because she’s finally given up on the family idea (or so she says) and she “still loves” me. Miss L., we had a lot of great sex trying to start a family, and we were really good sex partners. We were deep friends, too. Also, let’s be realistic, I have a lot of money, and she really liked that aspect.

Now I’m trying to decide what to do. I haven’t met anyone better, but she broke my heart when she left me. What do you think of this mess?

— Bitter, but Interested, North Kildonan

Dear Bitter: You still care about your ex, so you might need to give this a try. It may or may not work, depending on how much bitterness still exists over the marriage breakup. You’ll definitely need to go for serious talks with an open-minded relationship counsellor to see if the anger between you two can be resolved.

Also, you’ll need to look at your future and what style of life you’d want together, beyond the materialistic. Is the desire for children, from any source, totally done now? If not, some couples find a deep connection and happiness in adopting children — and not necessarily infants.

Others find the need to parent satisfied through welcoming animals into their home. Maybe you need a little place in the country. Bottom line? If you take this woman back, you’re going to get a lot of unasked-for criticism from friends who are worried for you. Luckily, it’s not their business, but make sure to tell them that nicely.

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: My son’s recently-dumped girlfriend cheated on him, the minx. If I weren’t desperate for a way to fill my time, I wouldn’t let her in my door!

She’s trying to get him back by being sweet to me. I’m a widow the last five years and live all alone. She’s been bringing gifts for me — baked treats — and she always asks to play cards with me. I enjoy the games, but I’m not fool enough to help her in this obvious scheme.

I’ve told her bluntly I’m not her way back into my son’s heart! She just shrugs and deals the cards. What do her little shrugs mean? She keeps coming back to my door uninvited, every week.

— Hard to Say No, Westwood

Dear Hard to Say No: The shrugs mean she doesn’t care what you think. This “minx” sees you as an avenue to your son, and she digs out more valuable information at every visit. Unfortunately, her unscheduled drop-ins may be keeping your son from visiting you. It’s time to replace this woman with friends closer to your own age, and let her find a different way to keep tabs on your son.

The good news? You can stop feeling hopeless about finding friends to play cards and enjoy other activities with you. The Manitoba Association of Senior Communities (manitobaseniorcommunities.ca) now has numerous centres in Winnipeg offering many great activities — such as the card games you love. You’ll be meeting a fun crowd closer to your age, and you’ll have a good chance at making new friends by getting involved in different activities.

For more online information, go to the Manitoba Seniors Guide (mb.211.ca/mb-seniors-guide), or phone 211 and ask where you can find the nearest seniors’ centre. Then get yourself well-involved.

Then, the next time your son’s ex-girlfriend comes calling, tell her it isn’t really appropriate to be hanging out with her.

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Maureen Scurfield

Maureen Scurfield
Advice columnist

Maureen Scurfield writes the Miss Lonelyhearts advice column.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Where paths cross

Carina Blumgrund 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Every so often, an ordinary moment turns out to be about something else entirely.

I watched two women meet outside a grocery store recently. Neither seemed to know the other. One had dropped a bag, oranges rolling across the wet pavement, and the other bent down without a word to help gather them. It took maybe 40 seconds. They exchanged a few sentences I couldn’t hear, laughed once, and went their separate ways. I don’t think either of them thought about it again.

I did, though. I kept thinking about how neither woman had planned to meet the other that morning. Their separate mornings happened to touch for less than a minute, and then continued on, changed by some small amount neither could probably name.

For a long time, when I thought about what brings people together, bridges were the image that came to mind. Bridges connect two known sides. They’re built on purpose, toward a destination already identified. I still believe in that kind of work. Deliberate bridges, built with intention toward a place meant to be reached, matter enormously.

Letters, Aug. 17

6 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Be statesmanlike, Pierre

Re: Canadians have moved on, Poilievre hasn’t (Aug. 7); Poilievre’s trade bluster a desperate bid for attention (Aug. 12)

If I were Pierre Poilievre, I wouldn’t be just thinking about becoming the next prime minister. I’d be thinking about legacy in larger terms — meaning how would I ultimately want to be remembered.

And I would want to be remembered as the politician who, even if not having achieved the ultimate goal of becoming prime minister, left the political world as a respected statesman. As such, with respect to trade and the relationship with the United States, I would be guided by the following maxim found in Tom Brodbeck’s Aug. 12 column: The goal should be to maximize Canada’s leverage while reducing its vulnerability.

Murphy helps Goldeyes battle back to beat Explorers

Mike McIntyre 5 minute read Preview

Murphy helps Goldeyes battle back to beat Explorers

Mike McIntyre 5 minute read Yesterday at 5:55 PM CDT

Max Murphy didn’t hesitate when asked to describe his season so far.

“It’s been terrible,” the veteran Winnipeg Goldeyes outfielder told the Free Press.

Murphy is admittedly critical of himself, the product of a high standard he’s set during a pro baseball career that began in 2014 and has included the past six years with the Fish, where he’s established new franchise records for home runs and RBIs.

So you can imagine the relief felt on Sunday when he looked a lot more like the Murphy of old in leading his team to a 6-2 comeback victory over the Sioux City Explorers to close out a six-game homestand at Blue Cross Park in front of a season-high crowd of 6,825.

Read
Yesterday at 5:55 PM CDT

Take advantage of hydroelectric potential

Jerry Storie 5 minute read Preview

Take advantage of hydroelectric potential

Jerry Storie 5 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

Manitoba Hydro tells us that we are going to need significant new electricity generation over the coming decades.

Hydro, like every other utility in the world has recognized this fact. Around the world, new generating capacity is being built. Countries that have access to hydroelectric potential are building dams and planning for the future. Other countries, without the natural advantage rivers provide, are building nuclear energy capacity. And yes, in almost all those countries solar and wind generating capacity are being developed as quickly as possible.

All that additional energy capacity is needed to fuel our endless need for technology, data storage and a thousand other things. Quickly moving to electric vehicles from combustion engines will also drive up demand.

Although it is tempting to think that ever larger and better battery storage will help, it will only help in how energy is distributed. The introduction of more and better battery storage is not likely to limit the total demand for energy. The enthusiasm for battery storage is understandable, but it is certainly possible that battery storage will effectively increase our use of energy, simply because it can be so reliably accessed from our battery storage systems.

Read
2:00 AM CDT

A better approach, but not yet enough

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

A better approach, but not yet enough

Editorial 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

In late June, when the Winnipeg Police Service launched a 10-day ‘crackdown’ on open drug use and illegal drug sales in areas in and around downtown, it did so without consulting or informing community outreach and social services agencies working in the targeted areas.

Inevitably, the WPS action drew criticism from several front-line agencies, which issued a collective statement just two days after the police operation began, pointing out that heavy-handed policing would drive vulnerable people away from the help they desperately need.

“Every day we work to build trust with people who have experienced trauma, discrimination, and barriers to care,” Kate Sjoberg, executive director of Resource Assistance for Youth, said at the time. “Actions that create fear around accessing services can undo months or years of relationship-building and place people at greater risk of preventable harm.”

At the time, WPS Chief Gene Bowers held up his hand and said, “That’s on me.”

Read
2:00 AM CDT

Lasting legacy or pining for a pipe dream?

Laura Cameron 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

The federal government is investing in major infrastructure, promising to expedite “projects of national interest” and pitching them to private investors at a summit in September.

The Manitoba government has its sights set on a pipeline and LNG export terminal at Churchill. Instead, Manitoba should be putting forward feasible, future-facing infrastructure proposals that would leave a positive lasting legacy of energy affordability, independence and security for Manitobans.

A pipeline and LNG terminal at Churchill are not viable for several reasons — the technical challenges of building a pipeline over thawing permafrost; the prohibitive cost of ice-breaking tankers to move LNG through the Arctic; and a forecasted global oversupply of LNG and uncertain long-term export markets.

Given these challenges, a private company coming out of the woodwork to invest seems exceptionally unlikely. Private proponents are also not interested in building oil pipelines to the west, and Prime Minister Mark Carney has now made clear his priority to work with Premier Danielle Smith on a West Coast pipeline, which would cost upwards of $35 billion (on top of the over $34 billion in public funds already spent on the Trans Mountain pipeline). It would seem this pours more cold water on the idea of a third publicly funded pipeline to Hudson Bay.