Not intense enough for the times
Cutthroat drama underwhelming amid real world's larger-than-life politics
Advertisement
Read this article for free:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Digital Subscription
One year of digital access for only $205*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.
To continue reading, please subscribe:
Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional
$1 for the first 4 weeks*
- Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
- Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
- Access News Break, our award-winning app
- Play interactive puzzles
*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.
Read unlimited articles for free today:
or
Already have an account? Log in here »
Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 09/12/2016 (3573 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
If it had been released in any other election year, the movie Miss Sloane might have impressed as a brisk, intelligent political thriller about the intrinsically dramatic field of political lobbying.
It’s not the fault of director John Madden and screenwriter Jonathan Perera that political reality became so surreal.
Madden, who directed Shakespeare in Love, The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel and thriller The Debt, is a solid, practical storyteller.
But this year, only the most baroque of stylists — say, Terry Gilliam — could have been able to do justice to a Donald Trump-infused political climate characterized by outrageous misinformation and crude showbiz bombast.
Is there room for a thinking person’s political thriller in an environment in which reactionary passions supersede reason?
Hopefully, yes.
This particular film is about not an election, but the ongoing struggle for hearts and minds in the debate over gun legislation. Elizabeth Sloane (Jessica Chastain) is the weapon of choice for a high-powered Washington lobbying firm run by George Dupont (an atypically sleazy Sam Waterston).
A loner insomniac with a penchant for pharmaceutical stimulants and tailored black evening wear, she is all about winning, with little consideration for whether her blitzkrieg lobbying campaigns serve the common good.
But Elizabeth seems to hit her limit when she takes a meeting with a gun-industry honcho (Canadian actor Chuck Shamata convincingly plays a pistol-packing American archetype) who asks her to devise a campaign that will get women voters to oppose impending gun legislation.
Elizabeth not only refuses the assignment, but she goes to work for the opposing side, a conscientious lobbyist named Rodolfo Schmidt (Mark Strong), taking her team with her.
The affronted Dupont feels compelled to “annihilate” her. And notwithstanding the icy, impenetrable exterior she shows to the world, Elizabeth proves to be vulnerable, not only due to her pill-popping but in her choice of sexual partners, specifically the studly Robert Forde (Jake Lacy) who, in his way, embodies the current phenomenon of “pay-for-play.”
Also, while Elizabeth may be on the side of the angels on this particular issue, she can’t turn off her manipulative style, even at the risk of hurting fellow campaigner Esme Manucharian (Gugu Mbathu-Raw), a woman with her own personal reasons for fighting for sane gun legislation.
While the film offers an often-startling portrayal of how lobbying campaigns work, its star is the most compelling reason to watch. Unafraid of taking on a character who is at best enigmatic and at worst unpleasant, Chastain plays the character as it lays. She makes no attempt to soften or validate a woman who, at bottom, defies our sympathy.
Usually, only men get to play such characters, and Chastain makes the most of it with a performance that reflects the go-for-broke ethos of the character.
randall.king@freepress.mb.ca Twitter: @FreepKing
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
