Memory may be mutable, but insights last a lifetime

Advertisement

Advertise with us

When I was a just-new 60-something, I gave a presentation at a retirement community complex located in Winnipeg’s West End. It was based on a novel I had written that had found some favour: two women in their 70s face losses: one suffering a broken hip from a fall; one devoted to her ailing lover and suffering the clearer sense that the life they have built running a dress shop can no longer be maintained.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 07/11/2022 (1412 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

When I was a just-new 60-something, I gave a presentation at a retirement community complex located in Winnipeg’s West End. It was based on a novel I had written that had found some favour: two women in their 70s face losses: one suffering a broken hip from a fall; one devoted to her ailing lover and suffering the clearer sense that the life they have built running a dress shop can no longer be maintained.

When I first enter, I note a games room, dining and sitting rooms, a small library. With a just-new-60 naiveté, I feel myself a long way off from such living quarters. I primarily think only of the endings that are taking place in this late-life community, wondering how community members are to be reallocated space as independence is compromised, and panelling moves them from independent to assisted to enhanced levels of care.

I begin the presentation by singing the opening of Leonard Cohen’s Hey, That’s No Way to Say Goodbye. I can’t sing well — I drift from one melody to the next such that Silent Night gives in to Somewhere Over The Rainbow without my awareness of the mutation — a “gift” my children endlessly perform for their amusement in singalongs they laughingly conduct. But, with an audience of the elderly before me, guitar in hand, I somehow find a way to sing that pleases. Imagine that, I think to myself. Not too shoddy.

There are about 15 people in the room, mostly women. Some rest in wheelchairs and walkers, some are with attendants, a few more are unaided. I had been told there might be 30 people or so. While I am singing, more enter and take their places.

Startled by the rendition I have delivered, even a little buoyed, I begin my “lecture,” weaving the novel’s story with others of losses I’ve lived: the death of my parents, aunts and uncles; the decades-long, chronic, incurable kidney disease my husband and I face together; the early deaths of childhood friends, deaths met by accident or by disease, before the reach of maturity or middle age.

I am looking out at the audience, looking down at the script that frames the planned readings from the novel, making way through the sections selected and rehearsed, but the text on the page ripens in the presence of this audience.

This often happens during the reading of creative work. The practiced reading changes, curated by the temperature in the room, the quality of the air, the space between the lectern and those seated, the presence of their attentiveness, their gaze. What had been a room full of old people blended together gives way. Each person becomes more of an individual secured in specificity. Relationships between us develop.

One particular women’s mesmerizing presence makes it increasingly difficult for me to focus on my script. I feel her steady beam, the pull of her awareness as I describe the novel’s hospital’s routine — benign but inept interventions and dreary procedures that torment the novel’s protagonists. Her aliveness awakens me more fully to the fact that those listening have lived with profound losses during the time of letting go late life requires. Their knowing comes through in the words some bring to me as they are leaving. Softly spoken: “I remember…”; “I know…”; “I can tell you…”

I listen. Transfixed. My throat is sore, the way a throat can be sore when you want to cry but don’t think you should. Bittersweet moments pass between us. Each exchange teaches. Memory. Story. They let me bring mine into the sphere of their influence. They let me lay it down beside their own.

The woman whose penetrative beam I felt with such force stands in front of me. She is beside a man in a wheelchair who smiles. He doesn’t speak and the woman tells me that he woke up while I was talking. Often he does not, she says, but today he found something of interest to hold his attention. She tells me to remember that.

She also tells me she was a nurse during the war and worked in a health-care centre very much like the one I am describing in the novel. She went to medical school, wanting to do the best she could for patients suffering the distress a medical system’s rules and regulations often impose.

Now she is in this retirement community. She has taken up painting. She loves the community and the painting. This is a very special place she tells me. I should remember that too, even though I am seeing only in from the outside. She adds that she has developed a tremor of late such that painting on canvas has become more difficult. So, she’s stopped, put away her brushes.

I listen carefully. I sense every word matters. She smiles. “I painted you today.” I look at her, bewildered. “Yes, while you were talking, I painted you. I painted…in here.” She points to her head. “I still paint all the time. I don’t need brushes anymore.”

In my usual way, I immediately want to know more. I want to see the paintings she once created, talk to her all afternoon, become her best friend. I ask if I might call, if she has an email address.

She smiles again. “I don’t use email.” She begins walking away, then turns back and adds, “I don’t think you need to see my paintings.” She has anticipated the rush of my enthusiasm. She looks at me steadily, waits.

My wanting to know more is silenced. I recognize, with her help, that what I would want from her has already been given.

She offers me the chance to know it; shows me how creative gifts are not laid down though brushes might be laid by. She shows me creativity ongoing, outwitting a failing body, alive in a mind and heart immutable, well able to create new forms of expression. She shows me her way to say goodbye to one dimension and simultaneously hello to another.

Ten years later and counting, I don’t forget her teaching. So often, the image I have painted of her in my own mind comes back to me. As do her words. I guess that’s what immutability means, for while my memory is changeable, my connection to her insight is not.

There are moments that have this kind of immanence and incandescence. I remember a second. My husband in the ICU in a bed, earmarked for palliative care, waiting to be transferred to a more appropriate space where he might continue dying. He has to be moved because ICU beds are at a premium, need to be taken by those with a chance of recovery. We wait, our little Winnipeg family, in this liminal space. We have never waited in such spaces before.

Our eldest son and his partner arrive from Kingston in the nick of time, their expressions haunted by the change to palliative they had not expected. We had all hoped against hope the second kidney transplant would not fail.

This son comes close to his father, who opens his eyes. This father has not opened his eyes for hours. Our son gently brushes the top of his head with his fingers. I tell my husband, his father, that they have just got off the plane. Suddenly awake, he asks, “Did you use my Air Miles?” That is the last thing he will say. He sinks further into the embrace of sedation.

I hold to this exchange: it embodies the chrysalis of this man’s care as father. Always he tried to give everything he had to his children. A practical man, bringing his tools and know-how to every broken or breaking-down thing his children might set inside their to-do lists, believing always anything could be mended, and thus the path for these children eased.

After his death, when we are together, a family feeling diminished by his absence, this story comes to life. Its visual character is shared, details are recalled, the time of day noted, the entrance of the palliative care nurse, the quality of the fading light that brings evening and ending.

Most significantly, at the centre of this memory, a portrait of a father’s eyes wide, open to what he might yet give. Immutability. In the midst of heart-wrenching goodbye, a warming hello to the enduring and evolving dimensions a last picture might yet paint.

debbeschnitzer@mts.net

Deborah Schnitzer

Winnipeg writer Deborah Schnitzer explores life lessons from women in their Third Act.

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Canada must not accept another Iranian autocracy

David Matas 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Iran is a state run by a radical government victimizing its citizens and its neighbours. How do we change that? Any regime change that repeats the mistakes of the past is not a solution.

What went wrong in the past which led to the current regime? One answer is the U.K. and American aided coup which led to the ouster in 1953 of a democratically elected government headed at the time by Mohammad Mossadegh and its replacement with an American friendly autocrat, the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

The Shah imposed his rule through the Iranian National Intelligence and Security Organization — SAVAK, the acronym of its Persian name. SAVAK systematically inflicted torture, arbitrary killings and extra-judicial killings on perceived opponents of the regime. It was only a matter of time before repression of a regime directed to serving foreign interests would be overthrown.

What replaced the regime of the Shah, in 1979, the current regime of the mullahs, is a regime as intolerant and violent as the regime of the Shah and then some. That was not inevitable. But neither was it surprising. The vicious nature of the current regime, following the example set by the Shah, and its hatred for the United States, reacting to the U.S. aided imposition of the Shah, both echoes and reacts to the past. In 1979, the U.S. reaped what it sowed in 1953.

Desperate Poilievre wants Canadians to believe the sky is falling when it’s just cloudy outside

Tom Brodbeck 5 minute read Preview

Desperate Poilievre wants Canadians to believe the sky is falling when it’s just cloudy outside

Tom Brodbeck 5 minute read Yesterday at 12:47 PM CDT

Pierre Poilievre has a problem.

Canadians just don’t seem to be paying much attention to him anymore.

So, naturally, the Conservative Opposition leader has decided to turn up the volume.

At a recent party caucus retreat in Penticton, B.C., Poilievre delivered the familiar message: Canada is in trouble, Canadians are hurting and the Liberal government is making everything worse.

Read
Yesterday at 12:47 PM CDT

Hellebuyck standoff caused by… Nathan MacKinnon?

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Preview

Hellebuyck standoff caused by… Nathan MacKinnon?

Mike McIntyre 6 minute read Yesterday at 6:34 PM CDT

Looking for someone to blame in the Connor Hellebuyck fiasco and cast as public enemy No. 1? How about long-time Winnipeg Jets nemesis Nathan MacKinnon?

Allow us to explain as we fire up the time machine and head back to February in Italy.

Oh, what could have been if MacKinnon had been able to score on what appeared to be an open net late in the third period of the men’s gold medal game with Hellebuyck down and seemingly out of position.

Instead, the star forward fired wide, keeping the score deadlocked at 1-1 as the clock ticked down on regulation.

Read
Yesterday at 6:34 PM CDT

Siloam Mission, WFPS discussing on-site paramedic to reduce staggering number of emergency calls

Scott Billeck 4 minute read Preview

Siloam Mission, WFPS discussing on-site paramedic to reduce staggering number of emergency calls

Scott Billeck 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

Winnipeg’s fire-paramedic service and its largest homeless-serving organization are discussing what it would look like to station at least one paramedic at Siloam Mission, as emergency calls to the downtown facility surge.

The ongoing discussions come as Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service crews were dispatched 1,771 times during the first eight months of the year to the two adjacent Siloam properties at 303 Stanley St. and 300 Princess St.

WFPS said most of the calls were related to overdoses or other consequences of substance use, with the total nearly double the 854 calls recorded over the same period last year. By comparison, there were 831 calls during the same span in 2024, and 591 in 2023.

“The number of emergency calls isn’t sustainable for us as a service, but it’s certainly not sustainable for them as an agency trying to provide services,” WFPS chief Ryan Sneath told the Free Press. “And they recognize that they’re impacting emergency services, not them specifically, but the site in a significant way.”

Read
Yesterday at 2:00 AM CDT

Manitoba abandoning spring, fall clock changes

Carol Sanders 8 minute read Preview

Manitoba abandoning spring, fall clock changes

Carol Sanders 8 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 8:48 AM CDT

Time’s up for the time change in Manitoba.

Manitobans won’t be setting their clocks back an hour in November. The province has decided to permanently stay on daylight time after surveying residents on the twice annual clock adjustment.

“We heard from Manitobans loud and clear — no more changing the clocks in Manitoba,” Premier Wab Kinew said in a news release Thursday.

Most of the 72,000 votes submitted in an online EngageMB survey — 92 per cent — said they would like to see the practice end. The survey asked if they preferred earlier sunrises in winter with standard time or the later sunsets in summer with daylight time. More than half of survey participants (58 per cent) indicated a preference to stay on permanent daylight time; 34 per cent voted to eliminate the time change but stay on standard time.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 8:48 AM CDT

A Winnipeg lawyer has been disbarred after admitting to six counts of professional misconduct and two counts of providing incompetent service involving eight clients.

The career-ending decision marks the sixth time Gisele Champagne has been disciplined by the Law Society of Manitoba since she was called to the bar in 1992.

“Disbarment is the appropriate remedy when a lawyer has demonstrated a repeated pattern of conduct that violates professional standards,” a law society panel said in a written decision released Wednesday.

“A lawyer who has been unable to learn from past discipline proceedings to fulfill his or her obligation to provide ethical and high-quality legal services must at some point lose the privilege of practising law.”