Send pipeline fights right to Supreme Court for speedy decision, Scheer says

By: Mia Rabson, The Canadian Press Posted: 12:30 PM CDT Wednesday, Sep. 18, 2019 Last Modified: 5:27 PM CDT Wednesday, Sep. 18, 2019

Advertise with us

HAMILTON - A Conservative government would overcome legal objections to building new petroleum pipelines by fast-tracking any cases right to the Supreme Court, party leader Andrew Scheer says.

Read this article for free:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

HAMILTON - A Conservative government would overcome legal objections to building new petroleum pipelines by fast-tracking any cases right to the Supreme Court, party leader Andrew Scheer says.

Read unlimited articles for free today:

or

Already have an account? Log in here »

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 18/09/2019 (2545 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

HAMILTON – A Conservative government would overcome legal objections to building new petroleum pipelines by fast-tracking any cases right to the Supreme Court, party leader Andrew Scheer says.

Scheer and other Conservatives have for years said Ottawa has to “assert federal jurisdiction” to get important projects built, but he has not until now explained what that would mean in practice.

At a campaign stop Wednesday, Scheer was pushed on comments he made in recent days about asserting jurisdiction in the face of objections either from Indigenous communities or provincial governments, including Quebec.

Federal Conservative leader Andrew Scheer speaks at a campaign event in Hamilton, Ontario on Wednesday September 18, 2019. Scheer says he would overcome legal objections to building new pipelines by fast tracking any cases right to the Supreme Court. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Frank Gunn

“It’s about fast-tracking some of the questions that have been raised by people who oppose the project,” he said.

“Fast-tracking those cases to the Supreme Court — referring those types of jurisdictional questions to the Supreme Court right away so that we can get certainty, instead of watching these court cases move slowly up and up, being appealed. We would have taken that directly to get finality on those decisions.”

The inability to get pipelines built has become a major source of frustration and anger in Alberta, where politicians from all parties believe other jurisdictions and communities are purposely landlocking Alberta oil, harming its economy.

The Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in particular has been riddled with court challenges from provincial and municipal governments, Indigenous communities and environment groups.

Indigenous communities and environment groups challenged federal approval of the expansion, and won in a Federal Court of Appeal case. After the federal government redid consultations and approved the project again last spring, the same groups filed new objections. The court has agreed to hear Indigenous complaints, but rejected those brought by others.

Those cases could eventually make their way to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear an appeal early next year from the British Columbia government of a B.C. Court of Appeal opinion that the province couldn’t restrict what flows through the pipeline, which is considered federal jurisdiction because it crosses provincial borders.

The B.C. case was seen as the final nail in the coffin for Kinder Morgan to proceed with the project.

It was shortly afterwards that Kinder Morgan told the Liberals it was suspending work until the company had the government’s guarantee the expansion would go ahead. When the company remained unconvinced in May 2018, the Liberal government stepped in and bought the pipeline for $4.5 billion.

Finance Minister Bill Morneau said the plan was to buy the pipeline, get through all the hurdles to the expansion, and then sell the entire thing to a private backer.

Scheer said Wednesday that in many cases the courts found the Liberal government hadn’t properly consulted Indigenous communities — even though the courts have made such findings about Liberal and Conservative governments.

The Federal Court of Appeal decision overturning federal approval of the Northern Gateway pipeline was based on a finding of faulty consultations and reviews done by the former Conservative government. The same court’s decision on Trans Mountain, in August 2018, related to a review process done partly by the former Conservative government and partly by the Liberals.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2019.