Vote Canada 2025

Liberal leader Carney commits to review of federal Access to Information system

Advertisement

Advertise with us

OTTAWA - Liberal Leader Mark Carney is promising a review of Canada's Access to Information system if his party wins the federal election, suggesting he sees room for improvement in how the law works. 

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 25/04/2025 (526 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

OTTAWA – Liberal Leader Mark Carney is promising a review of Canada’s Access to Information system if his party wins the federal election, suggesting he sees room for improvement in how the law works. 

On the federal election trail Friday, Carney committed to an “objective review” of the federal transparency regime, saying it would serve Canadians well. 

For a $5 fee, people can use the access law to ask for a range of federal documents — from internal emails and invoices to briefing notes and policy memos — but it has long been criticized as outdated and poorly implemented. 

Liberal Leader Mark Carney makes a campaign stop at Algoma Steel Inc. in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., on Friday, April 25, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
Liberal Leader Mark Carney makes a campaign stop at Algoma Steel Inc. in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., on Friday, April 25, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Government agencies are supposed to respond within 30 days or provide valid reasons why more time is needed to process a request. 

The law has not been significantly updated since its introduction more than 40 years ago, and many users complain of lengthy delays, heavily blacked-out documents or blanket denials in response to their applications. 

Carney said he was “happy to commit to having a review” because seeing how the law works as an outsider, he “can’t always follow the process,” citing redactions to documents and the time taken to answer requests.

“So an objective review of that would serve Canadians well regardless of the result of the election.”

There have been many studies of the federal access system over the years. 

Civil society groups, journalists and members of the public who took part in the last federal review of the regime called for expansion of the law, removal of loopholes, stricter timelines for responses and more resources to make the system work. 

In addition, in June 2023, a House of Commons committee made 38 recommendations to revamp the access system, including an amendment to the law that would allow for fines or penalties when agencies miss deadlines for answering requests.

In response, then-Treasury Board President Anita Anand said the next federal review, to begin sometime in 2025, would provide an opportunity to “leverage the committee’s helpful advice on the proposed reforms of the act.”

Earlier this week, The Canadian Press asked all of the major federal parties about the adequacy of the Access to Information Act and whether they propose any changes to the law or how departments respond to requests.

The Liberal and Conservative parties did not respond to the questions, and their platforms are silent on the Access to Information law.

In February last year, however, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said if his party formed government it would improve the system.

“We will speed up response times,” he said. “We will release more information.” 

“We will give the commissioner more power to override the gatekeepers within the government and favour transparency over secrecy.”

The NDP will push to amend the access law to cover the Prime Minister’s Office and the offices of other federal ministers, party spokesperson Anne McGrath said in response to the questions.

The party also advocates making it more difficult for federal agencies to withhold information considered to be advice or recommendations to government, McGrath said. 

In addition, the NDP backs giving the federal information commissioner, an ombudsman for users of the law, more powers, and adding a public interest override to the law to allow for release of information with environmental, health, safety or human rights implications, she said.

Bloc Québécois spokeswoman Joanie Riopel said the party advocates modernization of the access law to prevent excessive redaction of records.

Riopel also said the government should not control funding for the information commissioner’s office, in order to ensure the office’s independence. The Bloc also wants a review of the commissioner’s role and powers to see if they are sufficient.

The Greens did not respond to questions, but the party’s platform includes support for open government practices, ensuring proactive disclosure of documents and timely responses to access to information requests.

The Green party also advocates for expanding the law to cover Parliament and the offices of the prime minister and other cabinet members, creating a public interest override and enhancing the information commissioner’s powers. 

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 25, 2025. 

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Gillingham talks trash, pledges big bin boost

Joyanne Pursaga 4 minute read Preview

Gillingham talks trash, pledges big bin boost

Joyanne Pursaga 4 minute read Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Scott Gillingham says he would add hundreds of locked garbage bins downtown to prevent unsightly trash piles if re-elected as mayor.

Read
Yesterday at 2:01 AM CDT

Broadening prediction-market gambling a bad idea

Editorial 4 minute read Preview

Broadening prediction-market gambling a bad idea

Editorial 4 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Let’s make a prediction: sooner or later, when Canadian governments find a way to take their own cut of the action, prediction-contract gambling on everything from sports to entertainment to political decisions is going to come to Canada.

And that’s a horrible, dangerous, pernicious idea.

Unless you have particular access to information — either inside information or strategic information based on skills or education — you’re not likely to make money at it. In fact, structurally, you’re likely to lose. In prediction markets, you basically pay an amount, plus fees from the company involved, to bet on whether something will or will not happen within a certain time frame. The amount you pay for your contract depends on how other people are also betting.

As Wealthsimple describes it, “You buy whichever side you think is right. Prices move with demand, so if the market leans towards one outcome, the more that side costs. If a lot of people are backing the TSX to finish above 38,000, yes gets more expensive and no gets cheaper.”

Read
2:01 AM CDT

May be whiff of truth to ex’s odour ardour

Maureen Scurfield 5 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: I ran into an old boyfriend I used to curl on a team with, and we went for drinks. We’ve been almost eight years apart, and I couldn’t remember why we broke up, as we always had such a great time together.

It wasn’t until the second date — this time on a weekend — that it came back to me, with a jolt. Pee-yew! I remembered he doesn’t use deodorant on weekends. Why? He enjoys his own body odour. I recalled that a bit too late, and it was just as awful as ever! I went home early.

Tonight, he called and I refused him another date. I said, “Think back. You remember why we broke up?” Then he said, “Oh yeah, you hated my no-deodorant weekend policy. Well, guess what? Some women don’t mind!” I said I really doubted that, and that ended the conversation. Miss L., wouldn’t any women find stinky underarms offensive?

— Sensitive Nose, Fort Richmond

Mayoral candidate Vogiatzakis criticized for living outside Winnipeg

Malak Abas 4 minute read Preview

Mayoral candidate Vogiatzakis criticized for living outside Winnipeg

Malak Abas 4 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 6:03 PM CDT

A mayoral hopeful took heat from other candidates Friday for living outside Winnipeg while running in the civic election.

Mike Vogiatzakis’s primary residence is in the Rural Municipality of St. Andrews, about 25 kilometres north of Winnipeg — a community with its own mayor and councillors.

But the funeral director said he owns a home in Winnipeg where he divides his time, and he would move to the city full-time if elected mayor.

“It doesn’t matter where a person lives. Why are we dividing St. Andrews and Manitoba and Winnipeg? I’ve met the criteria to run for mayor,” Vogiatzakis said Friday morning.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 6:03 PM CDT

’Disgusting’ posters being investigated by police

Morgan Modjeski 4 minute read 2:22 PM CDT

The Winnipeg Police Service major crimes unit is investigating what some have labelled offensive and hateful posters on full-display at a Winnipeg home.

One of the people irked by the display is Gracie Garrett. She’s has lived on Ashburn Street in Winnipeg’s Minto neighbourhood for almost ten years. She’s never felt unsafe in the neighbourhood before, but now, a set of posters plastered on a nearby house are making her feel uneasy.

The five signs, posted facing the street prominently on a front window, contain a slur, refer to Nazis as “heroes” and call Muslims, Christians and other groups “evil.”

Learning of the signs Friday, Garrett said she’ll be reporting the posters to police, as she worries they incite and promote violence.

Khan should’ve taken high road: Goertzen

Carol Sanders 5 minute read Preview

Khan should’ve taken high road: Goertzen

Carol Sanders 5 minute read Yesterday at 6:39 PM CDT

The veteran Progressive Conservative who championed Obby Khan’s leadership bid says the former Blue Bomber dropped the ball by dissing his Tory teammates before he stepped down.

“I wouldn’t recommend it, and I didn’t recommend it,” Kelvin Goertzen (Steinbach) said in an interview Friday.

Khan resigned as PC leader and quit the caucus Monday saying some members were secretly plotting his ouster, even after he won a confidence vote on Sept. 25.

On Tuesday, Khan lashed out in a CJOB interview, naming the alleged plotters, saying constituents deserved to know which of their elected representatives “lacked moral integrity.” Khan told the Free Press he was “deeply emotionally hurt,” and felt stabbed in the back.

Read
Yesterday at 6:39 PM CDT