Cognitive Psychology
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
AI in the classroom — approach with caution
5 minute read Friday, Feb. 27, 2026Teachers and administrators have always been quick to jump on the latest bandwagon because they think that makes them good educators.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t because they often adopt strategies that are quickly proven to be wrong or worse proven to be detrimental to their students. If anyone dares to point out the lack of evidence for the use of the latest gimmick — ChatGPT in the classroom — they are discredited and told that they are not open to new ideas.
I am always skeptical of people like Sinead Bovell who came to speak to educators at the invitation of the Manitoba government at an “AI in education” summit. Her directive was to provide her predications about the future of technology in education. I did not attend this conference but based on what Maggie Macintosh reported in her Free Press article (Future students will be wired differently, thanks to AI, Jan. 16) Bovell told educators that they have to prepare for a future that will include technology in the classroom. The classrooms of today already have more than enough technology in them, so it appears what she was in fact promoting was the use of ChatGPT and other similar AI programs.
Bovell stated that no one knows what the future will look like and in that she is correct.
Google, Meta, push back on addiction claims in landmark social media trial
6 minute read Preview Tuesday, Mar. 3, 2026The commencement by some Americans of a “war on empathy,” not coincidental with the second Donald Trump administration, is shock, but not awe.
While discussing immigration on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast last year, Elon Musk declared that “the fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy” which people “exploit.” Adding that “we’ve got civilizational suicidal empathy going on,” he conjured up horrors of white Christian nationalist great replacement theory.
It served as a dutiful call to arms, and the American political and religious right mobilized on multiple fronts.
Sample recent publications include Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion (2024) by podcaster Allie Beth Stuckey, The Sin of Empathy: Compassion and Its Counterfeits (2025) by pastor Joe Rigney, and Suicidal Empathy: Dying to be Kind (2026) by professor Gad Saad. The image on the front cover of Suicidal Empathy is a sheep holding a protest sign demanding “Free the Wolves.”
Channelling anger productively: understand it, handle it, grow from it
6 minute read Preview Saturday, Feb. 7, 2026Why I expelled AI from the classroom
5 minute read Preview Friday, Jan. 2, 2026Local boxer earns invite to international tournament in Spain
5 minute read Preview Monday, Dec. 15, 2025Tools we use to determine what to trust
5 minute read Thursday, Dec. 11, 2025I rarely use Facebook, but I recently took a brief look. I was reminded how annoying it is when I was presented with numerous posts, photos and videos from people I don’t know. One caught my attention. It was a video of three adult male moose, all with huge antlers, attacking a colourfully decorated bus. Could the video possibly be real?
Curiously, it reminded me of a sentence in the memorandum of understanding between Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. It says, “Canada and Alberta remain committed to achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.” Is that a true statement?
How can I know if either is true? For the moose video, I could try examining it carefully for oddities. For the politicians’ assertion, I could delve into their past statements about climate change. But that’s rather impractical. Given the deluge of information I encounter every day, I couldn’t possibly research every statement to check its veracity. What should I do?
I could use a common tactic. I could rely on shortcuts.
Canada’s Fleming uses ‘rewired’ brain to push for Olympic biathlon spot
5 minute read Preview Saturday, Nov. 29, 2025Influencers have more reach on 5 major platforms than news media, politicians: report
5 minute read Preview Friday, Nov. 14, 2025Many Canadians preparing to cut back on holiday spending: survey
2 minute read Preview Wednesday, Nov. 12, 2025Algorithms of hate and the digital divide
5 minute read Friday, Sep. 26, 2025If recent events are any indication, it has become clear that the current use of technology has driven a wedge between people like never before.
The polarization of ideas, perspectives, ideologies, politics, identities, cultures, and other differences that are expected and should be celebrated in diverse and dynamic societies has resulted in an undercurrent of fear of the other, fuelled by media that reinforce our own beliefs and disavow others, the consequences of which are felt by a generation who more often is fed by and fed to an algorithm.
Imagine you are watching television and have a wide selection of channels to choose from: sports, news, cooking, mystery, sci-fi, the usual variety of channels. You decide to watch the golf channel for a while because you like golf. When you are done you go to the channel guide and discover that all your channels have changed to golf channels. Weird, but I like golf.
You go to the library. It has a great selection of thousands of books from all genres. You like mystery novels and pick one off the shelf to borrow. As you look up after reading the back cover, all the books in the library have changed to mystery novels. Mysterious, indeed.