Scientific Knowledge
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
As permafrost thaws, some headwaters in Canada’s North turn orange and toxic: study
7 minute read Preview Updated: Yesterday at 8:41 PM CDTA mop, a broom and a calmer mind. Why some find mental health benefits in everyday tasks
4 minute read Preview Thursday, Jun. 11, 2026The dangers of gambling on nuclear power
5 minute read Friday, May. 15, 2026Dismissing climate science, setting Canada apart from most nations and planting us firmly in the United States’ camp, the Carney government is betting the farm on a “nuclear renaissance.”
There have been numerous indications this was coming. But Energy Minister Tim Hodgson’s April 29 statement to the Canadian Nuclear Association, following immediately on the launch of the “Canada Strong Fund” left no doubt that our investment banker prime minister is determined to pursue his nuclear energy superpower dreams.
As the UN Climate Envoy, Mark Carney famously said there is “no path to net zero without nuclear.” This has been a mantra of successive Liberal governments even as Canada’s last nuclear build was in the 1980s, and nuclear’s share of global electricity production has been steadily declining. It’s also been the rallying cry of nuclear advocates spending big to persuade anxious populations experiencing floods, droughts and wildfires that nuclear power will solve our climate disaster in the making. That claim is false.
Eight years ago, the Liberals rolled out their “SMR roadmap,” predicting the first (slightly) smaller new reactors would be operational in 2026. It isn’t happening. A new report by M.V. Ramana and Susan O’Donnell — Assessing Small Modular Nuclear Reactors in Canada — details the $4.5 billion spent by Canadian governments on SMRs with zero kilowatts of electricity generated to date. Most of that money went to the potential first SMR in Canada, the BWRX 300, an American design by GE Hitachi that uses enriched uranium fuel, not available in Canada.
Health advice is all over social media. Here’s how to vet claims
5 minute read Preview Wednesday, Jun. 3, 2026Governments blasted for inaction as HIV rates rise
5 minute read Preview Friday, May. 8, 2026Parade of ghostly icebergs brings joy and wonder to Newfoundland and Labrador
4 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 30, 2026You don’t have to be an animal rights activist to oppose black bear hunting in Manitoba. You also don’t have to trade in your ethics in order to understand biology. Most animal and nature-loving Canadians can do it all: understand science and care about animal suffering. Well, unless your paycheque requires otherwise.
Such is the case for the author of a recent article for the Free Press (Why claims of sentience can’t guide black bear policy, Think Tank, April 16), Mark Hall, who conservation-washes the killing of black bears in our province. The B.C.-based hunting advocate also conveniently failed to mention his vested interest in the issue, including that the organization he works for is funded by companies in the trophy hunting business. He also failed to follow the actual science.
The fact is, framing Manitoba’s spring black bear hunt as a conservation measure grounded in biology just doesn’t hold up. Especially since it is also marketed by local companies as trophy hunting. “During your bear hunt you will be placed over an active bear bait site (and) with a little patience and some determination you will be able to harvest a trophy of a lifetime,” states one company’s website.
Lesley Fox, executive director of Canadian wildlife protection charity The Fur Bearers, says “heralding the spring bear hunt as conservation is a public relations tactic that supports special interests, not wildlife.”
Conservation shouldn’t come at the cost of access
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 5, 2026An 11-year-old boy is threatened with the distribution of nude images unless he pays an international extortionist who found him on TikTok. A 12-year-old girl is relentlessly pressured by someone she believed was a friend to expose herself on camera. A 14-year-old boy is unravelling — failing classes, withdrawing from life — because his friend is being exploited on Roblox and he feels powerless to help.
These are not outliers. In 2025 alone, Cybertip.ca processed more than 28,000 reports. These are just three.
Canada’s children are not stumbling into harm by accident. They are being systematically exposed to it — on platforms engineered to capture their attention, monetize their vulnerability and retain their engagement at all costs. The scale and severity of harm now demand more than incremental reform. They demand intervention.
For over 25 years, the Canadian Centre for Child Protection has documented a steep and accelerating rise in online harms against children. This trajectory is not coincidental. It reflects a digital environment that is fundamentally misaligned with the developmental realities of childhood.
A suspected outbreak of the rare hantavirus on a cruise ship in the Atlantic kills 3 people
4 minute read Preview Monday, May. 25, 2026Solar ranch in Tennessee aims to prove grazing cattle under the panels is a farmland win-win
5 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026St. Vital Park duck pond to get new design before $3-M rehabilitation in 2027
3 minute read Preview Thursday, Apr. 23, 2026Family donates 636 acres of peatlands near Elma to nature conservancy
3 minute read Preview Thursday, Apr. 23, 2026Nurse practitioners fill void as menopause clinic to open in 2027
5 minute read Preview Thursday, Apr. 23, 2026What to do with inconvenient wildlife
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, Apr. 21, 2026Former chief psychiatrist legally challenges Manitoba’s detox detention laws
4 minute read Preview Sunday, Apr. 19, 2026Former minister Catherine McKenna blasts the heads of Canadian oil companies
5 minute read Preview Monday, May. 11, 2026B.C. ‘chemical fingerprint’ scheme to track illicit drugs is likened to DNA tests
4 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 9, 2026Why claims of sentience can’t guide black bear policy
5 minute read Preview Thursday, Apr. 16, 2026EPA may ease regulation of chemical plastic recycling, and environmentalists worry
7 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 9, 2026Crop-enhancement firm eyes potato prosperity
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, Apr. 14, 2026The need for regulation in a digital age
5 minute read Monday, Apr. 13, 2026Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta and co-founder of Facebook, has been under increased scrutiny in past months after being forced to testify in a Los Angeles courtroom over allegations that Meta-owned Instagram is designed to be addictive, especially when it comes to kids.
Manitoba students’ science projects aimed at eye health, wildfire prevention take top marks
5 minute read Preview Sunday, Apr. 12, 2026Few food innovations as polarizing as genetic modification
4 minute read Saturday, Apr. 11, 2026Most of us have been eating foods derived from genetically modified crops for a generation or so, and so far, none of the ills attributed to modern food systems have been traced back to their use.
Except, perhaps our propensity towards overeating.
Since their introduction in the mid-1990s, genetically modified crops have taken over nearly half of the global area sown to soybeans, canola and corn.
The foods from these varieties, which are most often genetically modified to allow farmers to use herbicides that kill weeds but not the crop, are the same as traditional varieties in every measurable way.