Science (general)
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
Generic semaglutide to hit Canadian pharmacies this week at a fraction of the cost of Ozempic
5 minute read Preview Thursday, May. 21, 2026May long weekend second-coldest on record
3 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 19, 2026Hands-on workshop guides process of making unique, custom silver jewellery
7 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 19, 2026A mop, a broom and a calmer mind. Why some find mental health benefits in everyday tasks
4 minute read Preview Thursday, Jun. 11, 2026WHO chief concerned over ‘scale and speed’ of Ebola outbreak as Congo reports 134 dead
7 minute read Preview Wednesday, May. 20, 2026A critical project in waiting
4 minute read Saturday, May. 16, 2026Like most Manitobans I live in the city. I live in a home built about a century ago, in a well-treed neighbourhood. A 27-year-old gas furnace heats my home — one that needs replacing soon. I’d love to quit burning gas and electrify.
The options aren’t great. Electric heat costs more than double what gas does. Air source heat pumps work much of the winter, but fail during our worst cold snaps, leaving us dependent on expensive electric heat or gas backup — plus a noisy outdoor unit that ruins the patio.
If I had more land, like those with larger rural properties, I could bury horizontal coils in the ground for a fraction of the cost of drilling. But on my small city lot the only option is drilling 400- to 500-foot boreholes in the front yard. Expensive, even with Efficiency Manitoba incentives.
So: keep burning gas, or put up with a noisy compressor and still need a backup heat source. Those are my choices. But they don’t have to be.
Pair of bird books offer fascinating insight into the avian world
6 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 16, 2026The dangers of gambling on nuclear power
5 minute read Friday, May. 15, 2026Dismissing climate science, setting Canada apart from most nations and planting us firmly in the United States’ camp, the Carney government is betting the farm on a “nuclear renaissance.”
There have been numerous indications this was coming. But Energy Minister Tim Hodgson’s April 29 statement to the Canadian Nuclear Association, following immediately on the launch of the “Canada Strong Fund” left no doubt that our investment banker prime minister is determined to pursue his nuclear energy superpower dreams.
As the UN Climate Envoy, Mark Carney famously said there is “no path to net zero without nuclear.” This has been a mantra of successive Liberal governments even as Canada’s last nuclear build was in the 1980s, and nuclear’s share of global electricity production has been steadily declining. It’s also been the rallying cry of nuclear advocates spending big to persuade anxious populations experiencing floods, droughts and wildfires that nuclear power will solve our climate disaster in the making. That claim is false.
Eight years ago, the Liberals rolled out their “SMR roadmap,” predicting the first (slightly) smaller new reactors would be operational in 2026. It isn’t happening. A new report by M.V. Ramana and Susan O’Donnell — Assessing Small Modular Nuclear Reactors in Canada — details the $4.5 billion spent by Canadian governments on SMRs with zero kilowatts of electricity generated to date. Most of that money went to the potential first SMR in Canada, the BWRX 300, an American design by GE Hitachi that uses enriched uranium fuel, not available in Canada.
Saskatchewan seeding delayed by cold temperatures, wet soil but farmers undeterred
4 minute read Preview Thursday, Jun. 4, 2026Health officials working to control hepatitis A outbreak in province
4 minute read Preview Monday, May. 11, 2026Health advice is all over social media. Here’s how to vet claims
6 minute read Preview Wednesday, Jun. 3, 2026Governments blasted for inaction as HIV rates rise
5 minute read Preview Friday, May. 8, 2026Parade of ghostly icebergs brings joy and wonder to Newfoundland and Labrador
4 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 30, 2026You don’t have to be an animal rights activist to oppose black bear hunting in Manitoba. You also don’t have to trade in your ethics in order to understand biology. Most animal and nature-loving Canadians can do it all: understand science and care about animal suffering. Well, unless your paycheque requires otherwise.
Such is the case for the author of a recent article for the Free Press (Why claims of sentience can’t guide black bear policy, Think Tank, April 16), Mark Hall, who conservation-washes the killing of black bears in our province. The B.C.-based hunting advocate also conveniently failed to mention his vested interest in the issue, including that the organization he works for is funded by companies in the trophy hunting business. He also failed to follow the actual science.
The fact is, framing Manitoba’s spring black bear hunt as a conservation measure grounded in biology just doesn’t hold up. Especially since it is also marketed by local companies as trophy hunting. “During your bear hunt you will be placed over an active bear bait site (and) with a little patience and some determination you will be able to harvest a trophy of a lifetime,” states one company’s website.
Lesley Fox, executive director of Canadian wildlife protection charity The Fur Bearers, says “heralding the spring bear hunt as conservation is a public relations tactic that supports special interests, not wildlife.”
Conservation shouldn’t come at the cost of access
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 5, 2026An 11-year-old boy is threatened with the distribution of nude images unless he pays an international extortionist who found him on TikTok. A 12-year-old girl is relentlessly pressured by someone she believed was a friend to expose herself on camera. A 14-year-old boy is unravelling — failing classes, withdrawing from life — because his friend is being exploited on Roblox and he feels powerless to help.
These are not outliers. In 2025 alone, Cybertip.ca processed more than 28,000 reports. These are just three.
Canada’s children are not stumbling into harm by accident. They are being systematically exposed to it — on platforms engineered to capture their attention, monetize their vulnerability and retain their engagement at all costs. The scale and severity of harm now demand more than incremental reform. They demand intervention.
For over 25 years, the Canadian Centre for Child Protection has documented a steep and accelerating rise in online harms against children. This trajectory is not coincidental. It reflects a digital environment that is fundamentally misaligned with the developmental realities of childhood.