Artificial intelligence is accelerating faster than the governance structures meant to contain it. Canada now faces a structural test — whether our institutions can protect autonomy, dignity, and continuity in an era when decision-making is increasingly mediated by systems we did not design, cannot fully audit, and do not yet constitutionally constrain.

This is not a technological problem. It is a governance problem.

AI systems influence how information flows, how institutions behave, and how decisions are made. They shape the conditions under which harm becomes predictable. They amplify both the strengths and weaknesses of the systems into which they are deployed. And they do all of this at a scale and speed that outpaces traditional regulatory tools.

Canada’s current approach to AI governance relies heavily on policy, guidelines, and sector-specific regulation. These are important, but they are not sufficient. What is missing is structural clarity — a constitutional-grade framework that defines authority, responsibility, accountability, and the minimum conditions under which AI systems may operate without undermining human dignity or institutional credibility.

Tenants facing rent increases of 50, 75 or even 100 per cent in several Winnipeg apartment buildings should be taken seriously.

Increases such as these can be devastating for seniors on fixed income or families already stretched by the cost of living.

I’m familiar with the buildings in last Saturday’s article (Tenants slam Alta.-based landlord, protest rent increases, Sept. 26). Before the buildings sold, the same group had owned them for decades. Many rents were around $500 a month, maintenance had been put off for years, and some of the buildings were nearly unlivable.

Unfortunately, this isn’t unusual in Manitoba. Existing housing policy has led to the oldest rental stocks in the country, with tens of thousands of units at or past 50 years old. Keeping them livable will take hundreds of millions of dollars. This is a bad time to make reinvesting in apartments even less attractive and put thousands of construction jobs at risk.

When the Manitoba legislature returned to session on Tuesday, Sept. 29, former Progressive Conservative Party of Manitoba leader Obby Khan, who resigned as leader and from the party on Sept. 28, took his seat as an independent.

He joined a small group that rarely gets much attention — the members who sit outside the recognized parties. With him, there are now four.

How the legislature treats them says a lot about how seriously it takes the voters who sent them there.

Under the Rules of the Legislative Assembly, a party needs four members to be recognized.