Search Results
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
‘We don’t get to discriminate’: How a Raleigh ministry decided to help resettle Afrikaners
6 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 24, 2025First solo show in WAG-Qaumajuq’s flagship Qilak gallery
5 minute read Preview Friday, May. 23, 2025Trump signs executive orders to boost nuclear power, speed up approvals
6 minute read Preview Monday, Sep. 22, 2025Georgia man who fled with the nanny after his wife’s killing is charged with murder 19 years later
3 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 24, 2025Here’s a look at recent aircraft tragedies, mishaps and close calls
6 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 24, 2025North Carolina court says it’s OK to swap jurors while they are deliberating
3 minute read Saturday, May. 24, 2025RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina's highest court on Friday left intact a murder conviction that a lower appeals court had thrown out on the grounds that a jury shake-up during deliberations violated the defendant's rights and required a new trial.
By a 5-2 decision, the state Supreme Court reversed last year's decision of a state Court of Appeals panel that had sided with Eric Ramond Chambers, who has been serving a sentence of life in prison without parole.
The state constitution says no one can be convicted of a crime except by “the unanimous verdict of a jury in open court” that state justices have declared in the past repeatedly must be composed of 12 people.
A 2021 state law says an alternate juror can be substituted for one of the 12 after deliberations begin as long as the judge instructs the amended jury to begin deliberations anew. The judge at Chambers' 2022 trial did just that when an alternate juror joined deliberations because an original juror couldn’t continue the next day due to a medical appointment.