Debate and classroom discussion topics
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
A whack-a-mole approach to a complex problem
4 minute read Preview Saturday, Jul. 18, 2026The decline of the liberal arts
4 minute read Saturday, Jul. 18, 2026At his trial for impiety and corrupting youth, the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates defended himself by justifying his life’s work, famously maintaining that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” Lamentably, he was found guilty of the charges and ironically sentenced to death via drinking poison hemlock.
Yet human life is undeniably worth examining. So how do we best do so?
The liberal arts curriculum in Western post-secondary education — liberal as in “to be free” and art as in “learned skill” — has historically been perhaps the primary means of examining the human condition and experience, in contrast to vocational, professional or technical fields of study in universities.
Today they comprise the humanities, such as history, philosophy and literature, as well as the social sciences, such as anthropology, sociology and political science, with psychology bridging onto the natural sciences.
Reimagined Little House still shot through with the truth
5 minute read Preview Saturday, Jul. 18, 2026City tries to find the right balance in regulating personal e-vehicles
10 minute read Preview Friday, Jul. 17, 2026What happened to public service?
5 minute read Preview Friday, Jul. 17, 2026Demand for Naloxone training workshops grows as drug crisis intensifies
4 minute read Preview Wednesday, Jul. 15, 2026Alberta First Nation sues Ottawa over $5 treaty annuity, argues amount stuck in 1899
2 minute read Preview Thursday, Aug. 6, 2026Hegseth announces new policy to test troops for low testosterone
5 minute read Preview Thursday, Jul. 16, 2026Canadian AI: What kind, and who will own it
5 minute read Wednesday, Jul. 15, 2026What is it we should fear about AI? That it will take our jobs? Overload our electricity networks and make our own energy needs more expensive? Put scarce freshwater resources at risk? Or is it that it will be unregulated, breach privacy laws and be used for a wide range of perverse purposes?
If Canadians are among the most distrustful of the AI revolution, it isn’t because they are uninformed or technologically regressive. Their reluctance is because there is no plan for Canadian AI guided by an overarching public interest.
To the contrary, the hundreds of AI data centre proposals in Canada are driven by an investor frenzy completely disconnected from Canadian needs or economic and social goals.
A Canadian Press freedom of information request from the federal government revealed that power demands from current proposals total more than 20 GW, a massive capacity comparable to the total power needs of all Canadian households, and 25 times greater than the roughly 850 MW the federal government has projected that known sovereign AI proposals will reach by 2030.