Technologies, Topics and Trends
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
AI company Anthropic sues Trump administration seeking to undo ‘supply chain risk’ designation
6 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026Stars hit Paris runways, but fall’s real trend was dressing for hard times – and real life
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, Mar. 10, 2026International Women’s Day spotlight on invisible work
6 minute read Preview Saturday, Mar. 7, 2026It takes a village to raise AI responsibly
5 minute read Saturday, Mar. 7, 2026Anthropic, maker of the popular Claude artificial intelligence model, has been facing heat from the U.S. government over the ethics of military AI. Due to its safety-first approach, its AI was considered the best and was approved for use on classified military networks. It signed a lucrative contract with the Pentagon and was integrated into military systems. Sounds ominous, for sure.
But the contract specified that the AI could not be used for fully autonomous weapons systems that can kill targets without involving human judgment, and for mass domestic surveillance of Americans. The Pentagon fought back against these restrictions, even though it signed the contract as such, insisting that the AI could be used for “all lawful purposes” and quickly sought to punish Anthropic for not capitulating to its demands.
Anthropic stood by its guardrails, both on principle and contract, standing up against the dangerous use of AI, risking the loss of government contracts and punishment from the autocratic regime. In solidarity, Sam Altman from OpenAI, Google’s AI division (Gemini AI) and others have supported the stand that these guardrails are necessary in a safe and democratic society. It is good news that there are red lines that AI should not cross and that the companies themselves are standing up against them.
But what struck me about this battle was a statement from an Anthropic executive in response to the Pentagon’s demands which read: “Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today’s technology can safely and reliably do.” This defence is a clear definition of the limits of their AI model based on a deep understanding of its abilities as the creator of their technology. This becomes apparent when you look at how their model was developed.
Pentagon’s chief tech officer says he clashed with AI company Anthropic over autonomous warfare
5 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026VistaVision, a vintage format left for dead, is revived in ‘One Battle After Another’ and more
5 minute read Preview Saturday, Mar. 7, 2026Spin Master sees loss, lower revenue in holiday quarter
4 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026Many Canadian women seeing limited pathways to promotions, according to study results
3 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026OpenAI agrees to strengthen safeguards following B.C. mass shooting: minister
3 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026Province asks public to weigh in on rules for AI
2 minute read Preview Wednesday, Mar. 4, 2026Trial against Meta in New Mexico highlights video depositions by top executives
4 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026High-tech snowplows and AI help cities clean up from big storms
5 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026Drone application big step in crop protection
4 minute read Preview Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026Solomon to meet OpenAI CEO Altman in wake of mass killings in Tumbler Ridge, B.C.
5 minute read Preview Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026Big dreams, cold reality: Buzz builds for Port of Churchill, but risks could outweigh rewards
17 minute read Preview Friday, Feb. 27, 2026When the internet extortionist comes calling
4 minute read Preview Friday, Feb. 27, 2026Data centres and Manitoba: a cautionary tale
5 minute read Preview Friday, Feb. 27, 2026Growing more complex by the day: How should journalists govern use of AI in their products?
7 minute read Preview Saturday, Feb. 28, 2026Young woman says she was on social media ‘all day long’ as a child in landmark addiction trial
7 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026Burger King to bring AI-based voice coach to Canada later this year
4 minute read Preview Friday, Mar. 20, 2026New football chinstrap designed to lessen force of blows to facemask
4 minute read Preview Friday, Mar. 20, 2026AI chatbots and teens — a sometimes deadly combination
4 minute read Preview Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026Generalizations and facts
4 minute read Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026Recently, I ran across a social media post with 100,000 followers which stated that “the media is the communist arm of the government.”
At first blush, it is easy to write off an outlandish comment like this as a function of a neurodegenerative illness or a psychological disorder.
Certainly, as a middle-of-the-road regular contributor to articles on the Think Tank page, I have never thought of myself as a communist. Truth be told, the Free Press neither offers me direction about what I write, nor do they pay me for my op-ed pieces. A post like this also does a grave disservice to the many dedicated journalists who ply their trade according to strict ethical guidelines.
At the same time, however, I realize that there are people who don’t read the Free Press because they believe that the mainstream media (MSM) have been co-opted and corrupted by government subsidies.