July 6, 2020

Winnipeg
25° C, A few clouds

Full Forecast

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Fessing up about criminal past

John Woods / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES</p><p>The Law Courts in Winnipeg.</p>

John Woods / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES

The Law Courts in Winnipeg.

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 28/8/2019 (312 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Eight candidates in the provincial election have disclosed their criminal convictions in accordance with Manitoba's new election law.

A Free Press review of all the candidates’ statements of disclosure on the Elections Manitoba's website found that four New Democrats, three Greens and one independent have past infractions. Neither the Progressive Conservatives, Liberals nor any other fringe party had any candidates disclose a criminal history.

The offences range from non-violent civil disobedience and shoplifting to impaired driving and assault. The most recent conviction dates back 15 years while another happened more than 50 years ago.

"These were serious mistakes made years ago, for which they have all taken responsibility," NDP spokeswoman Emily Coutts said in an email statement. Since their convictions, each candidate who is running under the NDP banner has spent their career "working to make life better in their communities," Coutts said.

Mel Hiebert, a spokeswoman for the Greens, said the party assesses and vets potential candidates and their records on a case-by-case basis.

In May, the legislature passed a bill that requires candidates to inform Elections Manitoba if they had pleaded guilty or been found guilty of offences under the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act or the Income Tax Act.

The bill was introduced by Sarah Guillemard, a Tory backbenner who is running for re-election in Fort Richmond. As per the Elections Amendment Act, the record disclosures must be posted online by the chief electoral officer. Those who fail to disclose criminal convictions could face a maximum fine of $10,000 or a year in jail.

While Guillemard said the intention of the bill was to enable voters to "make the best decisions possible," University of Winnipeg criminal justice chair Kelly Gorkoff questions the ethics of the law.

Gorkoff, who teaches ethics, said the law, while ostensibly constructed to increase transparency, will likely have the unintended consequence of denying political legitimacy to people with a criminal history, regardless of the socioeconomic and racialized factors that might have contributed to their encounters with the law.

"Criminal records can be used in a very political manner, and I don’t think that’s an appropriate way to deal with someone’s past," she said. "It’s a very slippery slope. It’s not that the public shouldn’t be aware of who’s representing them, but that information needs to be thought about contextually.

"What has that individual done in terms of their own healing? That’s (an example) of the context necessary when using criminal record checks," she said, adding that this law would have disproportionate effects on racialized people, including Indigenous people, who are grossly overrepresented in the criminal justice system.

At least three of the eight candidates who disclosed incidents in their past — Ken Henry (Borderland) of the Greens, and Wab Kinew (Fort Rouge) and Joe McKellep (Assiniboia) with the NDP — are Indigenous.

McKellep, the candidate for Assiniboia, is Métis and Cree. In 1998, he was found guilty of assault causing bodily harm for his involvement in a bar fight, he told the Free Press last week. After his plea, he paid restitution and apologized to the man he assaulted. Then, he used his experience to educate Indigenous youth and communities, telling them, "A mistake doesn’t define you."

If that additional context isn’t given, Gorkoff fears that, at least in the minds of voters, it could define candidates under the new law. Political opponents, namely the PCs, have routinely reminded voters of NDP leader Kinew’s past run-ins with the law, heading into the Sept 10 election.

"At first blush, it seems like very convenient timing," said Gorkoff.

Kinew recently received a record suspension for his convictions, including assault, which date back more than a decade ago.

When the law was introduced, the PCs said it was a tool to boost candidate transparency.

ben.waldman@freepress.mb.ca

maggie.macintosh@freepress.mb.ca

Ben Waldman

Ben Waldman
Reporter

Ben Waldman covers a little bit of everything for the Free Press.

Read full biography

Maggie Macintosh

Maggie Macintosh
Reporter

Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Winnipeg Free Press. Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative.

Read full biography

Advertisement

Advertise With Us

Your support has enabled us to provide free access to stories about COVID-19 because we believe everyone deserves trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

Our readership has contributed additional funding to give Free Press online subscriptions to those that can’t afford one in these extraordinary times — giving new readers the opportunity to see beyond the headlines and connect with other stories about their community.

To those who have made donations, thank you.

To those able to give and share our journalism with others, please Pay it Forward.

The Free Press has shared COVID-19 stories free of charge because we believe everyone deserves access to trusted and critical information during the pandemic.

While we stand by this decision, it has undoubtedly affected our bottom line.

After nearly 150 years of reporting on our city, we don’t want to stop any time soon. With your support, we’ll be able to forge ahead with our journalistic mission.

If you believe in an independent, transparent, and democratic press, please consider subscribing today.

We understand that some readers cannot afford a subscription during these difficult times and invite them to apply for a free digital subscription through our Pay it Forward program.

The Free Press will close this commenting platform at noon on July 14.

We want to thank those who have shared their views over the years as part of this reader engagement initiative.

In the coming weeks, the Free Press will announce new opportunities for readers to share their thoughts and to engage with our staff and each other.

You can comment on most stories on The Winnipeg Free Press website. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press print or digital subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to The Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

By submitting your comment, you agree to abide by our Community Standards and Moderation Policy. These guidelines were revised effective February 27, 2019. Have a question about our comment forum? Check our frequently asked questions.

Advertisement

Advertise With Us