Hope for clarity, relief in dense-breast screening

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 27/10/2024 (705 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Manitoba’s health minister is open to the possibility of expanded cancer screening for women who have dense breast tissue.

Uzoma Asagwara said in an interview that while the province relies on the expertise of CancerCare Manitoba, it is prepared to factor in emerging research to guide decision-making. The comments come in the wake of a Free Press report that raised questions on whether some women with dense breast tissue are falling through screening cracks.

“(CancerCare has) experts and researchers that inform and guide the way that they roll out policies and provide care to Manitobans,” Asagwara said. “I also have our department looking at research nationally and beyond to help inform decisions that I make as minister.

“We want to make sure that we are staying on top of the science and the best information that is available to us.”

A cancerous tumour and dense breast tissue both present as white on a mammogram, creating a masking effect for women in categories C and D, the two densest breast categories.

In Category D density, mammograms miss about 40 per cent of breast cancers; in Category C, about 25 per cent are missed.

Some advocates and experts are concerned about a policy gap affecting women in Manitoba who are told in their mammogram result letters that they have dense breasts, but are not advised to seek supplemental screening.

Jennifer Borgfjord, 54, had mammograms at age 50 and 52. She found a lump on her breast a month after her second mammogram, which turned out to be cancerous. The mammograms were unable to detect the lump.

“Both my results letters included information about my breast-tissue density and my second letter identified me as having Category C dense breasts, which it said can increase the risk of cancer.”

However, a leaflet accompanying the letter stated dense breast tissue is common and does not mean a woman will develop breast cancer.

“The literature contradicts itself,” Borgfjord says. “I have Category C dense breasts, which appear white on mammogram imaging. Cancer also appears white on mammogram imaging. I needed supplemental screening — ultrasound and MRI — to find the 2.3-centimetre tumour. But there is no call to action in the letter. They do not offer supplemental screening.”

Borgfjord and others are calling for screening ultrasounds be offered to women over 40 with C or D breast density, as well as lowering the screening age so women 40-plus can self-refer for mammograms.

The provincial government recently announced plans to increase breast cancer screening and lower the age for self-referrals to 45 at the end of 2025 and 40 by the end of 2026. However, it provided no clarity regarding supplemental screening, such as ultrasounds and MRIs, being offered to women with dense breasts.

Heather Brister went through an experience similar to Bjorgfjord’s. She was 44 when she first felt a small lump the size of a pea on her right breast. After a diagnostic mammogram did not reveal anything was amiss, Brister was sent home without being offered additional screening or information regarding breast density.

When the lump had grown to 10 centimetres, Brister was sent for an ultrasound, with the resulting biopsy revealing she had triple negative advanced invasive ductal carcinoma.

The cancer had spread to her lymph nodes; she was a Stage 3C breast-cancer patient.

Dr. Lorne Brandes, a Winnipeg oncologist, said Brister should have been referred for an ultrasound when the initial mammogram was unable to locate the lump.

“If a radiologist doesn’t at that point refer that woman for an ultrasound then there is something really radically wrong with their judgment, in my opinion,” he said.

“People put their trust in you, and you have to do the right thing. The right thing is always: don’t leave a stone unturned.”

While women under 50 will eventually be able self-refer for mammograms, a requisition from a physician is required for an ultrasound.

“It’s up to the family doctor to be aware of the issue and to decide whether or not that patient should be seen by a breast specialist or in most cases have something like an ultrasound,” Brandes said.

However, some women in Manitoba are not getting the supplemental screening even after their physician has requested it.

A former Ottawa resident, who now lives in Manitoba, has Category C breasts and was advised by her doctor in Ottawa that she would need a followup.

Unable to register with a family doctor here, the woman, who asked to remain anonymous, visited a walk-in, where she “convinced a reluctant doctor” to send an ultrasound requisition to a breast-screening clinic.

However, she was turned away, as the clinic radiologist deemed it unnecessary.

The woman is currently still unable to access the necessary followup screening in Winnipeg.

Theresa, 33, is originally from Germany. She has a history of breast cancer in her family and was advised to have regular breast-cancer checkups from a young age by her gynecologist in Europe.

When her GP here was unable to determine whether she had a lump, she was referred for a screening ultrasound. However, she was scheduled for a mammogram instead.

“Radiologists said that ultrasounds don’t do anything. I eventually filed a complaint against the clinic with the College of Physicians, but my complaint was dismissed because no screening ultrasounds are currently done in Manitoba,” she said.

Because her mother’s cancer was detected late, Theresa (who did not want her last name used) booked herself in for an ultrasound at a private clinic in Toronto. She has since been told she requires a followup.

“Ideally, I want to see this being offered by our health-care system for free to all Manitobans. Early detection is such a big thing when it comes to breast cancer. I would like it if it was a service I could access here on an annual basis,” she said.

av.kitching@freepress.mb.ca