Global Issues
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
Consumers favouring combustion engine cars as interest in EVs wanes: report
3 minute read Preview Friday, Mar. 20, 2026Canada drops down to 25th place in world happiness rankings: report
3 minute read Preview Friday, Mar. 20, 2026An AI-rendered Val Kilmer will posthumously appear in a new film
3 minute read Preview Friday, Mar. 20, 2026David Suzuki is turning 90. Environmentalists may have ‘lost, big time,’ but he still has hope
5 minute read Preview Sunday, Mar. 22, 2026Churchill port could further stunt polar bear growth: U of M researcher
3 minute read Preview Monday, Mar. 16, 2026AI systems use Canadian journalism but seldom cite media sources: report
3 minute read Preview Wednesday, Mar. 25, 2026Indigenous partnerships key to wildfire preparation
5 minute read Preview Monday, Mar. 16, 2026The supreme leader is the problem
5 minute read Preview Saturday, Mar. 14, 2026Now is not the time for more pipelines
5 minute read Saturday, Mar. 14, 2026No war was ever started because a country built too many wind turbines. No leader was ever kidnapped because solar panels produced too much cheap energy. Western economies have never been brought to their knees by renewable energy cartels. Quite the opposite.
Clean, renewable energy brings stability and affordability. The technology already exists to free ourselves from the stranglehold of fossil fuels. What, then, stands in the way of the renewable energy transition?
The all-powerful fossil fuel cartel.
It is oil, gas, coal and pipeline companies that provide almost unlimited funding for lobby groups to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt about the benefits of clean renewable energy. Those same lobby groups execute a full court press on our political class, using their deep pockets to purchase influence. Their aim?
Not a just war
5 minute read Saturday, Mar. 14, 2026Harry Huebner in his letter to the editor (Vanishing limits, March 7) was, in my opinion, bang on in his analysis of where the world now finds itself because of the U.S. Operation Epic Fury attack on Iran. Like him, I am skeptical of the possibility of a just war, generally believing that just wars exist only in theory, never in reality.
This war has already shown no American inclination toward reasonable justification, international legality, judicious destruction and commensurate violence, and anticipation of desirable outcomes — the determinants of just war. As in all wars, the first casualties are truth, reason, morality and humanity.
The language of war is deliberately deceitful, meant to divert our attention from its real agenda and its human consequences.
The pretense that this was a defensive move necessitated because all diplomatic channels had been exhausted simply does not stand up as more details about the preparation for war are revealed. The evidence regarding Iran as a nuclear threat — nuclear buildup and capacity — is unsubstantiated, by now a well-known falsehood. The reluctance to call it war, instead depicting it as a “targeted major combat operation” seems clearly intended to appease MAGA folks incensed with U.S. participation in foreign wars.
‘We’re ready to defend the Arctic,’ Carney says alongside German, Norwegian leaders
4 minute read Preview Saturday, Mar. 21, 2026King penguins are the rare species benefiting from a warming world. But that could change
4 minute read Preview Sunday, Mar. 22, 2026Keeping books on library shelves
4 minute read Wednesday, Mar. 11, 2026I love children’s picture books: good books that connect kids to others who share their life experiences and that connect kids to people and places and times outside of their own experiences.
AI — when you find your servant is your master
5 minute read Preview Wednesday, Mar. 11, 2026TikTok to continue operating in Canada, subject to safety conditions
1 minute read Preview Wednesday, Mar. 11, 2026How the Iran war and surging oil prices are affecting consumers at the gas pump and beyond
7 minute read Preview Wednesday, Mar. 11, 2026Muslim community breaks fast at Grand Iftar to raise funds for people in Sudan, Gaza
3 minute read Preview Monday, Mar. 9, 2026Australia grants asylum to 5 members of the Iranian women’s soccer team
6 minute read Preview Tuesday, Mar. 10, 2026AI company Anthropic sues Trump administration seeking to undo ‘supply chain risk’ designation
6 minute read Preview Tuesday, Mar. 10, 2026Debate over a foreign spy service for Canada influenced by allies, money: study
7 minute read Preview Monday, Mar. 9, 2026Farmers again caught in geopolitical crossfire
4 minute read Preview Saturday, Mar. 7, 2026Show her the money
6 minute read Preview Saturday, Mar. 7, 2026It takes a village to raise AI responsibly
5 minute read Saturday, Mar. 7, 2026Anthropic, maker of the popular Claude artificial intelligence model, has been facing heat from the U.S. government over the ethics of military AI. Due to its safety-first approach, its AI was considered the best and was approved for use on classified military networks. It signed a lucrative contract with the Pentagon and was integrated into military systems. Sounds ominous, for sure.
But the contract specified that the AI could not be used for fully autonomous weapons systems that can kill targets without involving human judgment, and for mass domestic surveillance of Americans. The Pentagon fought back against these restrictions, even though it signed the contract as such, insisting that the AI could be used for “all lawful purposes” and quickly sought to punish Anthropic for not capitulating to its demands.
Anthropic stood by its guardrails, both on principle and contract, standing up against the dangerous use of AI, risking the loss of government contracts and punishment from the autocratic regime. In solidarity, Sam Altman from OpenAI, Google’s AI division (Gemini AI) and others have supported the stand that these guardrails are necessary in a safe and democratic society. It is good news that there are red lines that AI should not cross and that the companies themselves are standing up against them.
But what struck me about this battle was a statement from an Anthropic executive in response to the Pentagon’s demands which read: “Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today’s technology can safely and reliably do.” This defence is a clear definition of the limits of their AI model based on a deep understanding of its abilities as the creator of their technology. This becomes apparent when you look at how their model was developed.