Law
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
Kinew says watchdog could enforce proposed social media ban
3 minute read Preview Wednesday, May. 13, 2026MPs amend bill criminalizing sexual deepfakes to include ‘nearly nude’ images
5 minute read Preview Wednesday, Jun. 3, 2026You don’t have to be an animal rights activist to oppose black bear hunting in Manitoba. You also don’t have to trade in your ethics in order to understand biology. Most animal and nature-loving Canadians can do it all: understand science and care about animal suffering. Well, unless your paycheque requires otherwise.
Such is the case for the author of a recent article for the Free Press (Why claims of sentience can’t guide black bear policy, Think Tank, April 16), Mark Hall, who conservation-washes the killing of black bears in our province. The B.C.-based hunting advocate also conveniently failed to mention his vested interest in the issue, including that the organization he works for is funded by companies in the trophy hunting business. He also failed to follow the actual science.
The fact is, framing Manitoba’s spring black bear hunt as a conservation measure grounded in biology just doesn’t hold up. Especially since it is also marketed by local companies as trophy hunting. “During your bear hunt you will be placed over an active bear bait site (and) with a little patience and some determination you will be able to harvest a trophy of a lifetime,” states one company’s website.
Lesley Fox, executive director of Canadian wildlife protection charity The Fur Bearers, says “heralding the spring bear hunt as conservation is a public relations tactic that supports special interests, not wildlife.”
OpenAI did not respect Canadian privacy laws in developing ChatGPT, probe finds
5 minute read Preview Thursday, May. 28, 2026Man takes First Nation to court over banishment
4 minute read Tuesday, May. 5, 2026A Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation man argues bylaws that authorize mandatory checkstops to enter the community and the banishment of band members from reserve lands are unconstitutional.
Terry Wayne Francois, with lawyers funded by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms working on his behalf, filed a statement of claim in Manitoba’s Court of King’s Bench last week.
The claim names the First Nation, about 80 kilometres west of Thompson, as defendant. The community, also known as Nelson House, has yet to reply in court.
Francois argues two of the community’s bylaws violate multiple Charter of Rights and Freedoms protections and should be struck down by a judge as unconstitutional.
Chartrand lauds court decision as ‘victory for Red River Métis’
4 minute read Preview Monday, May. 4, 2026Empower youth by giving them tools to stay safe online
5 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 2, 2026Census data does much more than determine population
8 minute read Preview Friday, May. 1, 2026‘Denial of care’: Doctors worry about refugees as payment requirements take effect
6 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 23, 2026Young Canadians want AI companies to make their chatbots less addictive: report
5 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026Tumbler Ridge families likely to seek US$1 billion in lawsuit against OpenAI: lawyer
7 minute read Preview Thursday, May. 21, 2026The chief promise of artificial intelligence is turbocharged productivity. The trade-off? Epic disruption.
Time to act on provincial autism strategy
5 minute read Wednesday, Apr. 29, 2026I was in attendance in the gallery of the Manitoba legislature on March 19 when Bill 232, The Autism Strategy Act, introduced by Liberal MLA Cindy Lamoureux, passed second reading and moved to the committee stage.
Proposed social-media ban for Manitoba children gets likes, thumbs-down
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, Apr. 28, 2026Kinew threatens billion-dollar fines for tech giants ignoring social-media ban for youths
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, Apr. 28, 2026Child advocates call for online harms bill covering AI chatbots, gaming
5 minute read Preview Tuesday, May. 19, 2026OpenAI CEO Sam Altman ‘deeply sorry’ over Tumbler Ridge shooting where 8 were killed
4 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 16, 2026The pitfalls of increased use of AI in policing
5 minute read Tuesday, Apr. 21, 2026As a part of its body-worn camera program, the RCMP recently completed a pilot project using artificial intelligence to draft reports. The AI-generated reports are created from audio captured from officers’ body cameras. A report can be drafted in mere seconds. The pilot, which ran for about six months and concluded in January, occurred across eight detachments in British Columbia generating nearly 800 reports.
Harnessing AI to write police reports is replete with some serious and unresolved concerns and must be immediately discontinued.
It isn’t even entirely clear why police need to use AI in the first place.
The primary justification for the expanding use of AI to generate police reports across law enforcement is to free police from the administrative burden of having to write reports in the first place. The idea is that officers could do more relevant police work, presumably patrol work.
Former chief psychiatrist legally challenges Manitoba’s detox detention laws
4 minute read Preview Sunday, Apr. 19, 2026B.C. ‘chemical fingerprint’ scheme to track illicit drugs is likened to DNA tests
4 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 9, 2026AI content should be labelled, heritage committee says
2 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 9, 2026First Nations chiefs call for inquiry into RCMP after CBC report on surveillance
5 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 9, 2026U.S. leads spike in applications for Canadian citizenship by descent
4 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 9, 2026Couple fights city to retain 11-foot-plus fence
4 minute read Tuesday, Apr. 14, 2026A notable Winnipeg couple are fighting a city order to reduce the size of their more than 11-foot fence — which is much higher than allowed under city regulations.
Lynne Skromeda and Jason Smith built a fence in 2023 as part of renovations to their McMillan neighbourhood backyard. A neighbour filed a complaint and city bylaw inspectors ruled the fence was too high. The city later approved a variance application to allow for a seven-foot, five-inch fence.
“In 2023, the applicant worked with urban planning to arrive at a compromised height of 7.5 feet and the applicant advised they would reduce the fence height accordingly. Further inspections at the site reveal that the applicant did not complete the necessary reduction to the fence height to meet the supported and approved height of 7.5 feet,” says a report prepared for an April 20 appeal hearing.
The city’s limit on fence height is six-feet, six inches for rear and side yards, and four feet in front yards. The fence in dispute is more than 11 feet high along a portion of the west side yard and more than eight feet along the rear yard.