Law
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
Los Angeles school district settles with parents who sued over distance learning
3 minute read Preview Tuesday, Sep. 23, 2025AI chatbots changing online threat landscape as Ottawa reviews legislation
8 minute read Preview Sunday, Sep. 21, 2025Soccer facility closed after purposely set fire destroys $25,000 covered bench, damages turf
3 minute read Preview Friday, Aug. 29, 2025Online age checks are proliferating, but so are concerns they curtail internet freedom
6 minute read Preview Thursday, Dec. 4, 2025What Americans think about Trump’s handling of crime, according to a new poll
6 minute read Preview Tuesday, Sep. 16, 2025Lawyer argues Meta can’t be held liable for gunmaker’s Instagram posts in Uvalde families’ lawsuit
5 minute read Thursday, Dec. 4, 2025LOS ANGELES (AP) — A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued Tuesday.
Nineteen children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas.
The families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. The families, who were present at last month's hearing, did not appear in court, with a lawyer citing the back-to-school season. Many plaintiffs attended the hearing virtually, he said.
In one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: “Let’s normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?”
Federal judge refuses to block Alabama law banning DEI initiatives in public schools
3 minute read Thursday, Sep. 25, 2025A federal judge on Wednesday declined a request to block an Alabama law that bans diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in public schools and the teaching of what Republican lawmakers dubbed “divisive concepts” related to race and gender.
U.S. District Judge David Proctor wrote that University of Alabama students and professors who filed a lawsuit challenging the law as unconstitutional did not meet the legal burden required for a preliminary injunction, which he called “an extraordinary and drastic remedy.” The civil lawsuit challenging the statute will go forward, but the law will remain in place while it does.
The Alabama measure, which took effect Oct. 1, is part of a wave of proposals from Republican lawmakers across the country taking aim at DEI programs on college campuses.
The Alabama law prohibits public schools from funding or sponsoring any DEI program. It also prohibits schools from requiring students to assent to eight “divisive concepts” including that fault, blame or bias should be assigned to a race or sex or that any person should acknowledge a sense of guilt, complicity or a need to apologize because of their race, sex or national origin.
Musk says he plans to sue Apple for not featuring X or Grok among its top apps
3 minute read Preview Friday, Sep. 19, 2025Ontario’s proposed updates to municipal code of conduct rules flawed, critics say
5 minute read Preview Thursday, Sep. 11, 2025Corporation for Public Broadcasting to shut down after being defunded by Congress, targeted by Trump
5 minute read Preview Saturday, Sep. 20, 2025Native American radio stations at risk as Congress looks to cut $1B in public broadcasting funding
6 minute read Preview Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025Smith, Alberta Next panel’s first town hall hears support, calls for separation vote
4 minute read Preview Monday, Sep. 22, 2025UK arrests four people over cyber attacks on Marks & Spencer, Co-op and Harrods
1 minute read Thursday, Dec. 4, 2025LONDON (AP) — Four people alleged to be part of an organized crime ring were arrested Thursday for damaging cyber attacks that hit British retailers Marks & Spencer, Co-op and Harrods, the National Crime Agency said.
The unnamed suspects were identified as British males aged 17 and 19, a 20-year-old British woman and a 19-year-old Latvian man. They were arrested on suspicion of blackmail, money laundering, crimes for violating the Computer Misuse Act and participating in an organized crime group.
M&S said the cyberattack in April stopped it from processing online orders, left store shelves empty and cost it about 300 million pounds ($407 million).
Supermarket chain Co-op said attackers stole customers' personal data, disrupted payments and prevented it from restocking shelves. Luxury London department store Harrods restricted online access in May after it was unable to process orders.