Media and Communications
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
OpenAI agrees to strengthen safeguards following B.C. mass shooting: minister
3 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026Google settles with Epic Games with offer to lower its app store commissions
4 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026Province asks public to weigh in on rules for AI
2 minute read Preview Wednesday, Mar. 4, 2026Trial against Meta in New Mexico highlights video depositions by top executives
4 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026High-tech snowplows and AI help cities clean up from big storms
5 minute read Preview Friday, Apr. 24, 2026AI in the classroom — approach with caution
5 minute read Friday, Feb. 27, 2026Teachers and administrators have always been quick to jump on the latest bandwagon because they think that makes them good educators.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t because they often adopt strategies that are quickly proven to be wrong or worse proven to be detrimental to their students. If anyone dares to point out the lack of evidence for the use of the latest gimmick — ChatGPT in the classroom — they are discredited and told that they are not open to new ideas.
I am always skeptical of people like Sinead Bovell who came to speak to educators at the invitation of the Manitoba government at an “AI in education” summit. Her directive was to provide her predications about the future of technology in education. I did not attend this conference but based on what Maggie Macintosh reported in her Free Press article (Future students will be wired differently, thanks to AI, Jan. 16) Bovell told educators that they have to prepare for a future that will include technology in the classroom. The classrooms of today already have more than enough technology in them, so it appears what she was in fact promoting was the use of ChatGPT and other similar AI programs.
Bovell stated that no one knows what the future will look like and in that she is correct.