Power and Authority
Please review each article prior to use: grade-level applicability and curricular alignment might not be obvious from the headline alone.
‘This country cannot be broken:’ Campaign to keep Alberta in Canada launches
4 minute read Preview Monday, May. 25, 2026Proponents of solar power push for provincial infrastructure investment to boost grid resilience
15 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 23, 2026Pushing back against AI’s ‘inevitability’
5 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 23, 2026Banning YouTube removes tools from schools
4 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 23, 2026A Seal River proposal for all Manitoba’s needs
5 minute read Saturday, May. 23, 2026On Nov. 9, 2017, I stood in the Manitoba legislature and made a proposal whose time had not yet arrived.
I asked the chamber to protect the entire Seal River Watershed, roughly 50,000 square kilometres of intact boreal forest and tundra in northern Manitoba, a complete hydrological system running unbroken from its headwaters to Hudson Bay. No roads. No mines. No power corridors.
One of the last large watersheds left on Earth is still doing what watersheds are meant to do.
It was not a partisan proposal. It was not, that day, a particularly prominent one. The chamber was nearly empty. The proposal did not pass; it did not fail; it simply sat there. Within weeks, The Northern Miner picked it up and brought the idea to the national mining industry. Almost nobody else did.
Religious groups must keep careful eye on artificial intelligence
5 minute read Saturday, May. 23, 2026Programmers, computer scientists and software, mechanical, data and prompt engineers — these are some of the professions behind the creation of artificial intelligence. Should theologians and faith leaders also be involved?
Meghan Sullivan, a Roman Catholic who teaches philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, says yes. That’s why she was glad to attend a meeting in March at the invitation of Anthropic, the creator of Claude AI, about the role religion can play in the creation of this life-changing technology.
Sullivan, who also directs the university’s Institute for Ethics and the Common Good, was there with 15 other Christian philosophers, theologians and leaders to discuss the implications of AI for society today — and how it can be taught to behave ethically and morally using religion as a guide.
I spoke with Sullivan this week about that meeting. “I’m very grateful for Anthropic’s leadership in this area with faith communities,” she said, noting that most AI companies are not doing that. “It should have happened sooner, but better late than never.”
Manitoba’s newspapers portrayed province as rife with untamed potential — to the detriment of the Indigenous community
5 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 23, 2026Outrage over Northland Tales program hypocritical
5 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026Combat in the classroom: Many Manitoba public school teachers are concerned violence is making their jobs more difficult
9 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026Vast marine conservation reserve, bigger than P.E.I., to protect B.C. central coast
4 minute read Preview Saturday, May. 23, 2026MPI commits to truth, reconciliation with improved services for Indigenous Peoples
3 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026Judge to determine if dismissal of man’s filing against police was unreasonable
5 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026Planning for an electric future — now
5 minute read Friday, May. 22, 2026The shift away from fossil fuels to an electrified economy will advantage those who strongly invest in renewables.
Alberta is to vote on whether to hold a separation referendum. Here’s how we got here
3 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026CRTC triples streamers’ financial contributions to Canadian content
3 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026UN gravely concerned by an Afghan Taliban law that has provisions on child marriage
4 minute read Preview Friday, May. 22, 2026Alberta legislature committee eyes separation vote as meeting hits bizarre roadblock
6 minute read Preview Thursday, May. 21, 2026Louis Riel division hires province’s first Indigenous woman superintendent
4 minute read Preview Wednesday, May. 20, 2026Winnipeg police get behind Ottawa’s ‘lawful access’ bill
3 minute read Preview Wednesday, May. 20, 2026Time for change? Province launches survey to review clock changes
5 minute read Preview Wednesday, May. 20, 2026Premier has everyone’s attention on and about social media; now it’s time for some careful thought
5 minute read Preview Wednesday, May. 20, 2026Words matter
4 minute read Wednesday, May. 20, 2026I have been following with interest the media’s reporting of the ban in Manitoba’s Legislative Assembly on the use of the words racist, bigot, homophobe, misogynist and transphobe to call out hateful speech. The stated goal of the ban is “to improve House decorum.”
I’ve appreciated the fulsome coverage of this issue in the Free Press through the publishing of editorials, op-eds and letters to the editor. I was in particular struck by Premier Wab Kinew’s comments during his May 7 monthly interview with Marcy Markusa on CBC Radio.
Kinew’s strong opposition to the ban raises a critical question: How do we keep democratic civil society alive while silencing the calling out of discriminatory language and behaviour? Of course we can’t. By confusing decorum with silence we run the risk of contributing to a “head in the sand” mindset; to what American journalist and activist Barbara Ehrenreich referred to as a “Smile or Die” culture.
But then a followup question emerges: How do we effectively voice our legitimate dissent in ways that move us towards correcting discriminatory practices? A “no holds barred” approach to voicing our opposition may not be the answer. It’s all too easy to slip into shaming people by lobbing ad hominem/ad feminam attacks across partisan lines.
Designated encampments are a poor solution
5 minute read Wednesday, May. 20, 2026The overall shrinking of public space and degradation of the policy environment on use of public space is contributing to people experiencing homelessness being less safe — and contributing to interest in ideas like designated encampments. Unfortunately, this direction fails to centre the interests of people living unhoused. Further, we forget too easily that any consideration of land use on Treaty 1 land needs to start with historic claims and ancestral rights.
Among people experiencing homelessness, Indigenous people are overrepresented. Many people are living unsheltered on their own ancestral territories. Having endured intergenerational theft that started with land (transferred to settlers whose descendants now enjoy generational wealth), and continued with limits on movement, ability to make money, access to education and more, they are now actively surviving homelessness. Yet, the limits on their person continue.
Recent years have seen the closure and limits on use of public space throughout the downtown and broader city. These include Portage Place mall, the Millennium Library and Winnipeg Transit, and previously through the closure of downtown single-room occupancy hotels and their barrooms.
For some time, the city has been telegraphing an intention to limit access to outdoor public space according to housing status. At every opportunity, those cautioning against this move have raised the problem of limiting those with ancestral rights, and further limiting free movement of citizens on public land. The latter has been decided through B.C. legal process, and suggests the City of Winnipeg’s exposure to risk as it moves forward.