Proposals now more about drama than ‘property’

Advertisement

Advertise with us

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: Why, in 2020, are women waiting for an expected proposal of marriage? As in, when is he going to pop the question? Over recent years, there have been tons of female celebrities who seem to be waiting for their male significant others to pop the question. I’d like to say “WTF,” but that might not be as dignified as I should be at 70-plus years.

Read this article for free:


or

Already have an account? Log in here »

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Subscribe and receive a limited-edition Free Press branded hat or tote.

Digital Subscription

One year of digital access for only $205*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles

*First annual payment billed as $205.00 + GST for one year. This annual subscription will automatically renew at $233.00 + GST every 52 weeks (10% off the regular annual price of $259.35). Offer available to new and qualified returning subscribers only. Cancel any time.

To continue reading, please subscribe:

Add Free Press access to your Brandon Sun subscription for only an additional

$1 for the first 4 weeks*

  • Enjoy unlimited reading on winnipegfreepress.com
  • Read the E-Edition, our digital replica newspaper
  • Access News Break, our award-winning app
  • Play interactive puzzles
Start now

*Your next Brandon Sun subscription payment will increase by $1.00 and you will be charged $17.95 plus GST for four weeks. After four weeks, your payment will increase to $24.95 plus GST every four weeks.

Opinion

Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 19/06/2020 (2251 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

DEAR MISS LONELYHEARTS: Why, in 2020, are women waiting for an expected proposal of marriage? As in, when is he going to pop the question? Over recent years, there have been tons of female celebrities who seem to be waiting for their male significant others to pop the question. I’d like to say “WTF,” but that might not be as dignified as I should be at 70-plus years.

I’ve also been at a loss for words when a friend reports, admiringly, that her daughter’s future husband has asked the daughter’s father for permission. Yikes! That is a carry-over from pre-1900 (or somewhere around that time) when women were still considered to be property or chattel of a male and permission to transfer property was required.

— Any Words of Comfort? Winnipeg

 

Dear Comfort: In most modern couples, nobody’s thinking about who owns whom (and certainly it’s not daddy) and most young men and women don’t even know the meaning of the word chattel. In recent times, it’s more about the drama than it is about any kind of ownership or show of power.

Women often create the drama of the wedding, and some men enjoy the drama of surprising their lady love with a ring in a unique place. One rarely hears of a man asking the woman’s father for her hand in marriage, though it does happen in some old-fashioned families, more as an honouring thing. Show me the dad who has dared to say no!

Usually, the engagement is sprung upon mom and dad after their daughter has accepted the ring from her guy, down on one knee at a restaurant or party. Pre-pandemic, the engagement might happen for the world to see on a giant screen at a sports game with thousands watching, but that’s putting pressure on the woman not to say no and embarrass the guy! Unless there’s been previous discussion and an agreement, most people would not do this.

Lots of young women bring up the idea of marriage for discussion first, and if the two people are crazy about each other, it’s not a disappointment to the guy that she got things rolling. If he’s been dragging his feet, it’s a different story. In that case, he needs to say, “Thanks, but no. It wouldn’t work for me,” or any other awkward phrasing that comes to mind that adds up to a definite “no.”

 

 

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: I’ve been going out with a guy the last eight months, but since his older brother came home from university for a long stay, I’ve realized he is actually the one I prefer. He is much more mature, strong and ambitious. I also admit he’s taller, more athletic and funnier. He makes his younger brother look a lot less appealing.

I haven’t said anything to my boyfriend because he’d be devastated and I don’t even know if his older brother is interested in me. Please tell me what I should do.

— Attracted to His Brother, Brandon

 

Dear Attracted: You are a danger to this family. Telling your boyfriend his older brother is more attractive in every way could really hurt them as brothers. To avoid blowing things up, break up with your boyfriend as gently as possible — and don’t say a word to him about preferring his older brother.

Just get away from the family, and stay away. No doubt you’re tempted, but don’t wait a couple of months and chase after the big brother. Don’t hang onto the younger brother just to be near to the one you now prefer.

 

 

Dear Miss Lonelyhearts: My girlfriend is 32 and has her own little cottage at a lake in Ontario. She has been going up there on weekends and taking girlfriends — or so she says. She never invites me, although she hangs out with me Monday to Thursday. I am left alone on the weekends. I really like her, but it hurts she doesn’t want me with her at her cottage.

— Weekday Boyfriend, Crescentwood

 

Dear Weekday BF: You should be free on the weekends, and the weekdays, too. You’re quite right — she’s treating you like a convenience, not an important boyfriend she treasures. She may or may not be going up to the lake with her girlfriends. No matter what, you need to break free and stop accepting second-rate treatment.

 

Please send your questions and comments to lovecoach@hotmail.com or Miss Lonelyhearts c/o the Winnipeg Free Press, 1355 Mountain Ave., Winnipeg, MB, R2X 3B6.

Miss Lonelyhearts

Miss Lonelyhearts
Advice Columnist

Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.

Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Report Error Submit a Tip

More Stories

Liquor authority fines True North $12K after minors with fake ID served at Jets White Out party

Nicole Buffie 5 minute read Preview

Liquor authority fines True North $12K after minors with fake ID served at Jets White Out party

Nicole Buffie 5 minute read Yesterday at 6:17 PM CDT

True North Sports and Entertainment was hit with a $12,000 fine for serving minors with fake IDs during a Winnipeg Jets White Out street party in 2025.

The company was fined by the Liquor, Gaming & Cannabis Authority of Manitoba on May 13, 2025 after liquor inspectors attended the May 9 street party and witnessed two two minors in possession of and consuming liquor. One was visibly intoxicated, according to a compliance order dated May 15, 2025.

Both minors had security-issued “18+” wristbands and were using identification that was expired and “clearly not their image.”

The compliance order, provided to the Free Press by the LGCA, said inspectors also noticed inadequate identification checking by security before issuing the wristbands, which identify the people wearing them as being of legal drinking age.

Read
Yesterday at 6:17 PM CDT

City crews cleaning up drug paraphernalia, weapons having some impact on inner-city life

Malak Abas 7 minute read Preview

City crews cleaning up drug paraphernalia, weapons having some impact on inner-city life

Malak Abas 7 minute read Yesterday at 5:49 PM CDT

A three-person crew, employed by the city as part of its recently expanded proactive cleanup program, allowed the Free Press to follow along last week while they worked to make the Freight House Recreation Centre's property safe to play in.

Read
Yesterday at 5:49 PM CDT

Two-time cancer survivor trades blows with angry Lake Winnipeg in epic 12-hour fundraising swim

Zoe Pierce 3 minute read Preview

Two-time cancer survivor trades blows with angry Lake Winnipeg in epic 12-hour fundraising swim

Zoe Pierce 3 minute read Updated: Yesterday at 2:46 PM CDT

After 12 hours of wind, waves and a painful shoulder, Jonathon Fenton has finished what he started, making it across Lake Winnipeg.

The 62-year-old two-time cancer survivor completed the roughly 26-kilometre swim Sunday, a year after shoulder problems forced him to stop 16 kilometres into his first attempt.

The swim was the second year of Fenton’s Jonny’s Big Swim fundraiser, which supports the Alberta Cancer Foundation, CancerCare Manitoba Foundation and Health Sciences Centre Foundation.

He raised roughly $48,000 this year, bringing the two-year total to about $90,000.

Read
Updated: Yesterday at 2:46 PM CDT

Kinew pledges temporary ER in Dauphin by Labour Day

Free Press staff 1 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

Dauphin’s 8,400 residents, ravaged by floodwaters from unprecedented rainfall in June that has left the city without its hospital for the entire summer, will have a temporary but functioning ER shortly, Premier Wab Kinew promised Monday.

“We’ve heard you loud and clear Dauphin,” Kinew said in a post on X on Monday. “You need these services close to home, you’ll have an emergency department working by Labour Day.”

Dauphin Mayor David Bosiak was elated after hearing the news. “We’re tickled in town,” Bosiak said, adding he has faith the premier will deliver.

Kinew is expected to provide further details Tuesday.

Improving building standards

Jean Clipsham 4 minute read 2:00 AM CDT

As I was working in my garden today, I was thinking that, while I still enjoy it, I am starting to wonder how much longer I will be able to care for a house and a yard. Like many my age, I have been thinking about the condominium option here in Winnipeg.

I am a mother and a grandmother and I am also very concerned about climate change and the need to recognize that our emissions from coal, oil, and gas are warming the Earth. As a climate activist, I do not want to pollute. Yet as a condo purchaser, I would have no control over how the building is insulated, heated and cooled or how much energy it would take to do so.

When I moved to Winnipeg four years ago, I intended to buy a house and install a heat pump, which heats and cools a home using electricity only.

Before that purchase, I phoned Manitoba Hydro and was advised to buy a home built after 1985, when national standards were upgraded to require better insulation. That was no trouble for me, given I had already moved from a 1960s house into a new house in 1989 and even though the new home was larger, our gas bill was cut in half because of the added insulation.

Letters, Aug. 18

7 minute read 2:01 AM CDT

In support of real engineering

Jerry Storie’s op-ed Take advantage of hydroelectric potential and Laura Cameron’s op-ed Lasting legacy or pining for a pipe dream, both in the Free Press Aug. 17, provide quite different perspectives on what should be done to provide reliable power to Manitoba residents in the future.

Mr. Storie advocates construction of more hydroelectric projects rather than new natural gas generated capacity to offset looming power shortages. He argues that these hydroelectric projects will benefit Manitoba for the next century, and observes there will be significant increases in the demand for electricity in upcoming years. He is not wrong in any of these observations. However, hydroelectric developments are very capital intensive and have long lead development periods. Natural gas generation can be brought on line far more quickly with less investment. And perhaps Mr. Storie’s minimization of the environmental impacts of these developments deserves more scrutiny. Any First Nations impacted by development deserve to be consulted and participate in any benefits. Having said this, Mr. Storie is a former minister responsible for Manitoba Hydro, and thus has a fairly deep understanding of the issues at hand.

Laura Cameron advocates against construction of the LNG pipeline and terminal at Churchill, citing “the technical challenges of building a pipeline over thawing permafrost; the prohibitive cost of ice-breaking tankers that move LNG through the Arctic; and a forecasted global oversupply of LNG and uncertain long-term export markets.” These would all be persuasive arguments if Ms Cameron possessed any credentials indicating an expertise in engineering or economics. She does not. The balance of Ms Cameron’s op-ed focuses on ways for Manitoba to reduce its carbon footprint while taking a few shots at the proposed LNG pipeline to B.C. Her opposition to the pipeline to Churchill is almost a Trojan horse.